Jura S

Camera system choices do not prevent me from kicking the habit.

Why are you trying not to understand?! I was responding to your claims about max exceptable ISOs. And why are you posting thumbnails?

I have two Tokinas. 12-24/4.0 for crop and 16-28/2.8 for FF. They never needed any firmware updates. The first one sometimes reports "no connection with the lens" on m50. But can be worn out ...

Are you talking to yourself?! Please reread the thread.

It is not ridiculously huge. Sigma 150-600 on m50 is just that. Ridiculously huuuuuge. If you like the local range Sigma 18-35 is an excellent lens. I do have it but it is one of a less used lenses. ...

Maybe that you've missed the essence of our discussion or you've just missed the right thread.

???????? What are you talking about?! ... and 6D can go even further in the right circumstances. Even with an obsolete and trivial lens

What is that?! Does that substantiate any of your previous claims or disprove any of mine?

... obviously you didn't check the rest of the exif data. But you are moving a goal post. Your initial statement has been something about usability of particular camera bodies at specific ISOs.

... with or without context it doesn't matter.

Are you shure? It's not a top notch IQ, but it is acceptable. ISO 16000 ISO 8000

Kenko 1.4x DGX works on Canon version.

I do have both M50 and Sigma 150-600. I never had a problem you describe. The only problem is the size of M50 with such a big lens. It is an attachment not real camera body.

Really quality stuff. ... some PP cropping  & tuning  and your photos are world class,

... it is true. I do ride a bike.

.... you are living in a cloud.

Apple cloud. ... and another cloud.

Master stupidity & ignorance cloud.

Why are you posting thumbnails.

I still use it/them. One from the beginning (professionally), one barely used for my personal use. Both are over 200k now. No, at that time 7D was the only affordable "professional"  camera body. I ...

... one more, but with a crop body. 7D + 100/2.8L at f/2.8.

There's no actual difference except usually slower AF, shorter MFD and minimal geometric distortion. ... there's no "macro" effect for portrait photography. 100/2.8L at f/2.8 100/2.0 USM at f/2.0