photohounds

Precisely - selective measurebating, nothing more . . . 99% of the time most  wants MORE DOF, not wafer thin DOF It's mere obsession used to "justify"  brick and bazooka mass/sizes.

Not even close 2 stops slower shutter speeds are a definite disadvantage. It's all part of the selective "equivalence" lie, a lie that appeals to some.

Most o09bvious issue - lens softness and/or movement. Try repeating this with a 75 if you have one. More pixels will often "better"  show up lens softness ...

I like the performance of Zuiko 1,2 lenses very much, my wallet yearns for other things. ;) -- .Had equivalence disease when switching from 6x7cm to MINI 35mm format. Now cynical charlatans call ...

Not much to pick between them - both systems are very good. I prefer Oly all-round - bigger, more versatle system. Nice and portable if you stay away from 1,2 lenses :)

Fact. IS implementations favour smaller, lighter sensors. You prefer to ignore physics. One *cannot* ignore sensor weight when you are accellerating it, for IS. It is not my job to educate you. Go ...

Irrelevant to IS, and linear resoiution is 2x max - Where'd you get 4x - the marketing of pixel count to inflate the "resolutoin"? Basic maths: 20MP is twice the linear resolutin of 5MP. . Back to ...

It is also easier to stabilise a sensor that's 1/4 the weight. FMF will *never* get that crown, ever.

As a former RB-67 user *ie REAL full frame*  I've often postulated the same idea. . A tactile "revolving back" switch on the grip to simulate a revolving back and maybe a tad "chunky", no matter ...

EV is also used to talk about stops - Viz. -2EV = 2 stops underexposed or 2EV less light - etc.. It was even in OM-1 handbooks in 1972.

EM1+ offer keystone correction in camera. Little "need" for a heavy (vignetting) PC lens, really. Vignetting (light loss) wastes much of the FMF "advantage".

Dictionary definition: n: an obsession prevalent in insecure people with a dose of G.A.S. . Indications: . Bragging incessantly about wafer thin DOF; . Toting excessively large cameras/lenses ...

Anticipate, lift trigger finger, repress Hasn't caught me yet, but HAS regularly saved me from thousands of extra frames. You can also use a 'slow' 25FPS :) Weigh the options, make your choice.

Oh that poisonous envy . . . ALL camera systems are a compromise - bar none. Full MARKETING Frame is quite often left at home (bulk/weight). MF has even "bigger, better" sensors "better" DOF - so ...

Not reading a bazillion posts, but if it hasn't been said: You can *limit* how many images are taken in a burst.  Try that. I had the same issue - just too many sometimes!

Waddaya mean? They were very good :)

OOPS, I was referring to 1300 kilometres - not miles - mea culpa!

Looks like a copy of an OMD with a bigger lens mount .. OH. . it IS!
Like all of the recent entries, they merely copy Oly/Pana ideas.
Formula: Innovation*(marketing gimmicks) = 0value

Like...

Haha - some will say that :)

You're driving way too slow :)  Here in OZ it's reasonable to safely do that in 13h. Say Syd2BRS - you still need somewhere to stay, though.