millerfilm

millerfilm

Lives in United States Olive Branch, MS, United States
Works as a Writer and Photographer
Has a website at http://millerfilm.com
Joined on Mar 18, 2012
About me:

I am an advanced amateur photographer. I have a Minor Degree in Photography and have attended two cinematography classes.

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
In reply to:

tom43: @dpreview: Why gets this toy a story? Meanwhile Kodak announced during CES the revival of the most prominent film ever, Ektachrome slide film, which is not mentioned by a single sentence?!

http://www.kodakalaris.com/en-us/about/press-releases/2016/kodak-alaris-reintroduces-iconic-ektachrome-still-film

So many of us out here just want Polaroid to go back to being Polaroid. Fuji has shown how well received instant film photography can be. Meanwhile, i do agree that the return of Kodak's Ektachrome is indeed sweet! Now, if we can just get Kodak to make 110 film again. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 17:42 UTC
In reply to:

OlyPent: It's not real Polaroid. It's just an inkjet printer and a cheap digital camera. The idea of Polaroids is the look they produce, that the picture is produced by a chemical reaction.

The key is film. Fuji's Instax and Impossible are doing that. Polaroid is ironic in being the one using a built-in printer.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 17:39 UTC

Interesting that Fuji uses film for its Instax, and Impossible is recreating classic Polaroid film, but Polaroid themselves are still putting a printer in their digital cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 17:38 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

jskrill: Can you please define PL, EF, F, MFT and E mounts.

Given how expensive that lens is, I would definitely want a Positive Lock on it!

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2012 at 15:19 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4