DirkL

Link is broken. Anyway, it takes more than one sample (and not one of one's own choice) to prove something is not a coincidence. Actually, it takes a rather wast number of samples to show a ...

It will not be 2 times either.

Haha, good one :-)

But you said lens equivalence is sensor independent. I do not disagree, although the type of noise will be a mitigating/aggravating factor. But I disagree with those who claim it will be 4.00 times ...

Are you serious? An FF f1.4 on a m4/3 camera is 4x better than a m4/3 f1.4 on a m4/3 camera? Quantify precisely chroma noise, luminance noise, random noise and banding please.

Following your logic one could also claim that all 28 mm f2.8 FF-lenses are 'the same' . Of course they are not. They might differ in FOV, resolution, modulation transfer, CA and other ...