FlyinDoc

As a Sony shooter, I can honestly say this has to be worst product Sony has produced since they started making serious cameras. Every problem that has been glaringly obvious since the A6300 is...

Well, while the AF and battery life may be good, I listed out exactly where Sony is behind the curve. They are all features and improvements Sony have brought to their FF line-up but haven't ...

At long b****y last! Sony's flagship APS-C camera is so far behind the curve, it's sad. They desperately need to update the sensor and processor with improved readout speeds. A better EVF and rear ...

The 400mm and 600mm GM Primes are amazing too. The 200-600mm is a total bargain. The 16-55mm f/2.8 G for APS-C is as sharp as any prime - so yeah, they are on a roll.

Who asked for two card slots? If Canon can put 32 mpx in their APS-C offering at the same price, Sony can too, without going straight to $4000. The extra dial is simply more useful for a lot of ...

No, what we need is a new sensor and processor, with much faster read speeds, and  menu, handling and ergonomic improvements brought to the latest FF cameras. This does not require a $4000 camera. ...

This must be a pure Supply chain issue, and the only reason for this "upgrade".

Watch the Manny Ortiz review on YouTube where he compares the Canon and Nikon versions vs the Sony.

I've tested DeepPRIME NR vs Topaz DeNoise AI, and Topaz is easily better. DeNoise AI is also better integrated into Lightroom as a Plug-in, and is faster than DXO at processing images, since it...

What I really really want is an A7SIII with a 24mp sensor. No need for 9 million dot EVF, no need for 4K120, no need for 1080p240fps, but keep the rest. Add shutter closing to protect sensor from ...

I'm a Sony shooter and this is the first camera I have no interest in buying. Overpriced and merely a spec war contest with the R5 - which costs a mere fraction of this.

No fully articulation...