GeorgeD200

Lives in United States The Great Lakes State, United States
Works as a Educator
Joined on Nov 20, 2007

Comments

Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Sony a9 banding issue: fact or fiction? (733 comments in total)
In reply to:

Trundling: About that clever explanation on 60 and 120Hz lamps from Jim Karson. It doesn't work like that. You can't calculate the shutter speed against the frequency of lights. You are comparing the sensor to ONE lamp. There are thousands of them on the stadium and they are not synchronized. So at any given moment you'll be catching light from thousands of impulses at various stages of the cycle.

And another thing that got me a little disturbed. 2% is not "only". It is, as you cleverly caclulated, 50 out of 1000. How many good shots were ONE out of a thousand? In sports photography every shot can be "the one". That said, however, we should remember that ALL good sports shots that really matter came from the era of film cameras.

How is it that any sports photos "matter"? And if they can, what difference does it make when they were taken? I don't think history, or the impact of photography on it, ended with the digital revolution.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 15:42 UTC
On article Nikon D7500 vs Canon EOS 80D (265 comments in total)
In reply to:

farandhigh: plastic vs plastic

@quiquae "I'd be surprised if it was any different."

How does this inane statement get 6 likes? Making assumptions with no basis in fact is foolish and pointless. You're just wasting space, and implying something with no evidence to support it. The D7500 is clearly a VERY new body style. I wouldn't assume anything about its construction (and I've held one, as well as almost every other Nikon ever made.)

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2017 at 14:36 UTC
On article Nikon D7500 vs Canon EOS 80D (265 comments in total)
In reply to:

J Graf: Very simple, if you have a Nikon, stick to it, if you have a Canon, stick to it. If you are a newcomer, this article is most useful.

"Insert vague, debate-inciting generalization here"

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 12:13 UTC
On article Nikon D7500 vs Canon EOS 80D (265 comments in total)
In reply to:

I own 128 cameras: This paragraph seems confusing:

"The 4K video mode on the D7500 comes with an additional 1.5x focal length crop over the existing 1.5x crop from using an APS-C sensor, meaning a full 2.25x crop relative to the focal length printed on your lens. This means even at the 18mm wide-angle setting of the D7500's kit lens, you'll be getting a 40.5mm-equivalent field of view when you shoot 4K video. On the other hand, the D7500 has no crop factor when shooting Full HD, just like the EOS 80D, so you could argue that having 4K at all is a nice bonus"

I think the last few sentences need to be reviewed as you are talking about the wrong camera. Or, on the other hand, I could be mis-reading.

I think you are misreading. To paraphrase:
D7500 crops alot during 4k. The D7500 does not crop at all during regular 1080 HD. Since the 80D doesn't even do 4k, you can't really say that the cropping hurts the D7500 when comparing the two cameras. But when comparing to other 4k-capable cameras, the crop factor may hurt the D7500 comparative performance.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 12:01 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

glennwithtwo: Nice camera - only three things wrong: there's no grip, it doesn't have a grip, and the grip is missing.

DrGerm is not referring to the battery contacts. He is referring to the other contacts that allow for shutter actuation, AF control, front and rear command dials, etc. -- those dozen or so contacts that would be required for grip operation.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2017 at 11:54 UTC

Balanced or not, I would be an inch shorter after a day of using that rig! I'd guess it weighs around 25-30 lbs, including camera and lens. It may work for a day, but the long term health effects... And you'd need a zone of caution tape around you. You can't possible shoot and keep watch behind you. Those wheels stick out 18" behind him. A good fast swing of that thing, and you could knock someone flat, rubber wheels or not. In today's world, that would likely lead to a lawsuit.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2017 at 12:43 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

GeorgeD200: What about the original intent of the author/photographer? How would people feel if I decided that "Starry Night" should be more purples and greens, instead of blues and yellows? Leave B&W alone!

Maybe they are afraid to tell you it's a dumb idea because they know that you will argue incessantly with them.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 02:03 UTC
In reply to:

GeorgeD200: What about the original intent of the author/photographer? How would people feel if I decided that "Starry Night" should be more purples and greens, instead of blues and yellows? Leave B&W alone!

This is not "converting black and white photos into color". Let's call it what it is: artificially adding guessed-at colors to old photos. I don't see why anyone would want to add fantasized color info to their historical family artifacts, but that's just me.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2017 at 16:25 UTC

What about the original intent of the author/photographer? How would people feel if I decided that "Starry Night" should be more purples and greens, instead of blues and yellows? Leave B&W alone!

Link | Posted on May 22, 2017 at 03:34 UTC as 1st comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Arca45Swiss: Judging by the lack of comments on the last six or eight articles, DPR is sorely missing the mark with this fluff no one cares about

The biggest camera company in the world launchest a contest that could provide an entire summer of travel and photography to one of its readers, and you suggest that it's not newsworthy? Don't you have some MTF charts waiting for you somewhere?

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 10:12 UTC
In reply to:

Tommi K1: When they come out with f/1.4 and f/2 lenses then there will come many buyers more.

Also, f1.4 lenses would be massive and heavy. f/2 might come along someday, but I doubt it.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 20:03 UTC
In reply to:

upptick: So, the main reason I believe there is a God is because humans are able to devise machines and instruments that are far, FAR more complicated than what would be needed for mere survival --- Darwin would say that there is simply no selective / competitive pressure and therefore no survival advantage to create anything nearly as complicated as this Sony lens. Yet, here it is. What an exquisite beauty!

This has nothing to do with Darwin. Try Marx. "Prestige Value" items that cost far more than their function would dictate.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2017 at 04:19 UTC
In reply to:

ABM Barry: I shouldn't judge this lens family, however, they look rather plain and rather agricultural when you compare them to Sigma, Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Panasonic, Fujifilm and most of the well established makers.
There is no way on Earth I would pay their asking price given the competition.

I like the look: minimalist, straight lens tubes, not a lot of flaring or ornamentation, simple fonts and knurling. But then I like classic Leica lenses, too, which is clearly what they're aiming at.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 21:41 UTC
In reply to:

DVT80111: Since new camera has IBIS, I hope they remove the OSS feature and give us cheaper and more robust lens.

Cheaper? ROFL. Sorry DVT80111, but I don't think you know how this game works. Did Sony's SLR lenses turn out to be cheaper, because they didn't need OSS?

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2017 at 03:48 UTC
In reply to:

Zoron: any sigma Medium Format art lens for Fuji GFX 50s ?

Not likely. The market is too small. If Sigma isn't going to produce lenses for Sony A7 Series, you can be sure Fuji MF is out of the question.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2016 at 03:05 UTC
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (717 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lassoni: How is this thing any better than GX8? That lens looks a little bit like the panleica 15mm

Well, it has 3.84x the sensor area, and doesn't use a Bayer pattern to predict color. It also has an optical rangefinder. Frankly, it will kick the snot out of a GX8 for B&W.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2015 at 14:08 UTC
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (717 comments in total)
In reply to:

alexisgreat: I love my sensors bare, no filters allowed. That means no Bayer, no AA, no IR/UV cut filter. I add filters as I please, whether they be for narrowband imaging for light polluted areas or broadband color imaging or even UV or IR imaging.

I hate how manufacturers decide whats good for us and they add the filters "built-in" and cater to the lowly masses. I like building my own computers, telescopes, and cameras. It's how you LEARN. No wonder society is being dumbed down- no one likes to innovate anymore.

...

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2015 at 17:44 UTC

Perhaps we photographers can't see the forest for the trees. This looks like a gimmick to us, but how would a cell-phone buyer look at it?

Maybe Sony isn't trying to sell more cameras, but more phones. Sony now offers something that no other phone manufacturer does, and you don't even have to buy it at the same time as the phone, you can always upgrade to it later. Maybe they will bundle them together, or offer combined rebates.

I'm a full frame DSLR user, and my first question when buying a new phone is "How good is the camera?" --because I don't always have my SLR with me. Sony's answer now is "Best in the business!" Sure, these can be used with other brands of phone, but do all brands fit to the back as well as the Sony does?

That said, I won't be buying this, but I can see why some people would.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2014 at 15:13 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

dash2k8: "Khaldei, who staged his photograph a couple of days after the event, is reported to have hoped that the image would have the same impact as Joe Rosenthal’s famous photograph ‘Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima’."

I'm sorry, but the Berlin picture is nothing close to the Iwo Jima picture. Iconic for sure, but the Iwo Jima picture is the standard of "raising banner over hostile territory" while many commoners have never even seen this Berlin picture.

I tend to think that this picture has a lot in common with Imo Jima -- they were both staged by the photographer, and are probably both considered by most "commoners" to be authentic. ;)

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2014 at 23:33 UTC
In reply to:

munro harrap: Somebody asked about the future worth of digital equipment and "Iconic" photographs made with them. Well, the advantage is that many identify the image as from that particular machine.iDs Canons, for example have serial munbers you cannot alter for each image and a code linking image to machine.

But that Leica could be one I had years ago- there is no way anyone can prove what pictures a film camera took, so the chances it is not that camera are substantial, and I would not bid on it.

More and more of this kind of nonsense is going on. Possibly the photo of the guy is with a Leica, but he surely would have been using Fed or Zorki Leica copies made in the USSR rather than a machine made by the people the USSR was fighting.

The WW2 Russian war hotographers completely outclassed anyone in the West, but I believe they were equipped with their own gear.

I don't think he could have been using a FED or Zorki -- I had always heard that the Soviets had no camera industry until after they carted it back, parts, machines, technicians, and all from Germany after the fall of the Reich.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2014 at 23:26 UTC
Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »