photoaddict

Lives in United States TX, United States
Joined on Mar 13, 2004

Comments

Total: 60, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

Camera manufacturers should NEVER apply a fix to cards that are clearly at the fault of card manufacturers.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2016 at 20:06 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article 8K Helium Super 35mm sensor on the way from RED (86 comments in total)
In reply to:

noflashplease: I shudder to think about the computing resources required to actually edit uncompressed 8K video.

but the sensor is smaller and the pixel is smaller too so it should be as quick as editing 2K.

/sarcasm

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 20:57 UTC

So, it glows when nuked?

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 17:37 UTC as 38th comment
On article iPhone SE is a compact-sized iPhone 6s (184 comments in total)
In reply to:

dan801: I think it's too small. They should have made it the same size as the iPhone 6

I have iPhone 6 and it's too big. I am definitely getting SE because it's small and makes it much more portable. Size does matter when it comes to portability especially when you're well traveled. I have iPad Pro because it's light and thin, not a ridiculously bulky heavy laptop.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 21:18 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: That is why I switched to Nikon. Canon still lags behind the sensor sensitivity and noise control. ISO-invariant sensors are the future and allows more latitude for me to edit images.

Canon has been nothing but years of disappointment when it comes to competitive image quality. I am fed up with noise when I increase the EV.

Canon doesn't seem to be innovative nor competitive anymore.

There's a dedicated Nikon for astronomy.

http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/dslr-cameras/d810a.html

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 22:07 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: That is why I switched to Nikon. Canon still lags behind the sensor sensitivity and noise control. ISO-invariant sensors are the future and allows more latitude for me to edit images.

Canon has been nothing but years of disappointment when it comes to competitive image quality. I am fed up with noise when I increase the EV.

Canon doesn't seem to be innovative nor competitive anymore.

rrccad, I've done shots with both Canon and Nikon and found no meaningful difference if both are shot with proper exposure and settings.

But the reality is that I am a human being and I will make mistakes from time to time. Having a Nikon gives me more latitude with fixing my human mistakes.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 23:32 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: That is why I switched to Nikon. Canon still lags behind the sensor sensitivity and noise control. ISO-invariant sensors are the future and allows more latitude for me to edit images.

Canon has been nothing but years of disappointment when it comes to competitive image quality. I am fed up with noise when I increase the EV.

Canon doesn't seem to be innovative nor competitive anymore.

Wow, you're so way wrong. Nikon has one of the best high ISO sensors. Do you actually read reviews on DPReview? Nikon has consistently outperformed Canon at high ISO image quality when models and prices are similar.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 22:45 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: That is why I switched to Nikon. Canon still lags behind the sensor sensitivity and noise control. ISO-invariant sensors are the future and allows more latitude for me to edit images.

Canon has been nothing but years of disappointment when it comes to competitive image quality. I am fed up with noise when I increase the EV.

Canon doesn't seem to be innovative nor competitive anymore.

you got that right! :D

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 22:03 UTC

That is why I switched to Nikon. Canon still lags behind the sensor sensitivity and noise control. ISO-invariant sensors are the future and allows more latitude for me to edit images.

Canon has been nothing but years of disappointment when it comes to competitive image quality. I am fed up with noise when I increase the EV.

Canon doesn't seem to be innovative nor competitive anymore.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 21:30 UTC as 79th comment | 8 replies

So far, it seems that only S3 Pro has the sensor with the widest DR ever. And since then, there's nothing like that. I don't know of any cameras (including successors of Fuji) capable of having that much DR.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms3pro/19

It's really a disappointment that they have not managed to be competitive with S3 and FujiFilm apparently abandoned that sensor.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 23:51 UTC as 3rd comment

Hipsters are more interested in "analog" world where things are processed and could easily be interpreted via different mediums, optically.

Digital files are not analog nor optical. You would have to know how to write a code to decode a file. Digital image is made of zeros and ones and there is no way you can optically extract information.

Analog film is organic. It is also optical. It lets you extract data with the use of optics and chemicals rather than computers. That appeals to "hipsters" as it makes them feel like they can actually have a tangible value on it.

I appreciate them. At least they produce results than you people producing works as a result of your computers doing the work for you.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 17:51 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

Marcster: Support for RAW? I would like to be able to capture in RAW and insert the SD card right in.

Why not make the iPad Pro with a i7 processor and run OSX?

I have been using macs for over 30 years and recently this is one of the first times I'm tempted to buy the Surface Pro 4. It can do everything the desktop can do. RAW files import from the SD card and full LR editing.

It won't happen because i7 generates too much heat and consumes too much power. iPad pro uses A9 which is extremely efficient and doesn't generate much heat.

Surface pro 4 is an alternative but it's sure an ugly tablet. The stylus is also tacky. And it runs Windows which I hate.

If you want a Mac, You can get MacBook or MacBook Pro - both have Retina display.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2015 at 17:07 UTC

The "quantum film" just looks terrible.... it makes me think of VHS quality video. I'd rather use my iPhone.

The DR is a big issue but when there's so many colors that look unnatural, then DR doesn't matter anymore.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2015 at 02:59 UTC as 2nd comment

Which purple hue from Nikon or Sony is more accurate if you can recall? I see a significant difference in blue-purple hue between cameras.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2015 at 18:58 UTC as 84th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Chris Yates: Kinda pricey for a Chinese brand.

That's actually cheap as fast lens like that often fetch around a thousand dollars.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 00:56 UTC
On article Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (212 comments in total)

It seems like photoshopping is faster and easier on iPad Pro than on a computer with Apple Pencil. It just works. And the image - wow, you can zoom in and out smoothly and fluidly... and cloning out objects remove them instantly.

http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/188173/hands-on-ipad-pro-with-apple-pencil

And I really like the note taking app!

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 02:40 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
On article Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (212 comments in total)

You can open and edit RAW files on iPad Pro according to Apple's website:

"The A9X chip is capable of processing data so quickly, it demanded a new memory architecture. iPad Pro features a revamped storage controller that helps deliver performance better than some desktop computers. This increases read and write speeds, so you can quickly open even the largest files. Like the big 4K movie you just edited or all the RAW images you imported from your HD camera."

http://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/technology/

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 18:11 UTC as 15th comment
Total: 60, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »