-
I have the same feeling that my GAS will be sated once I fully switch to OM-1 with all lenses I really may ever need in my hobby.
-
At my desk there are two system now, which I am comparing thoroughly. I am more than impressed how potent the OM-1 is. As I shoot mainly sports/action both indoor and outdoor, I know exactly what ...
-
My experience with high ISO pics from OM-1 is very positive. I processed pics from DPR studio and DxO RawPure does not make pics too plasticky. However, I read that Topaz has the tendency to make ...
-
I am waiting for my OM-1 and can't wait till I take it and test it my way. In the meantime I downloaded high ISO files and treated'em with PureRaw. I do not shoot birds or anything, where details ...
-
PureRaw makes MFT very competitive against other systems.
-
Hi there I have just tried DxO Pure RAW 2. OMG!!! I must admit that this software blew my mind. I downloaded OM-1's high 12600 ISO RAWs and let the DxO do its job. I downloaded some high ISO ...
-
I wonder if there are any other photo brands, where users migrate back and forth? I have been the R6 user for 2 years, thinking of enlarging my photo stable with OM-1 and some fast zooms (10-25 / ...
-
That is the first thing one must do when switching from a system to a system. As I am demanding enthusiast I am 50/50 as far as upgrading my photo stable. Needing the second body I probably accept ...
-
You can read thousands of reviews and opinions, but the best way to see if you like the system is to try it. I downloaded loads of OM-1's RAWs to see how much I can push them through the LR. I know ...
-
Hi there I have FW 1.3.1 in the R6 and I wonder if updating will kill my Samyang RF 14 F2.8, making it redundant? Now they both work well. I am shooting karate tournament this coming Saturday and ...
-
Tokina 11-20 F2.8. I used this lens with Sony A6600 with great results, especially sharpness.
-
OM-1 with 12-40 is lighter and smaller than R6 (my perspective) and RF 24-70. OM-1 with 40-150 F2.8 Pro is on par with R6 and RF 70-200 F4. I also did the same homework ;-) I have had R6 for 2 ...
-
I used to have 50-100 F1.8 adapted to Sony A6600. It worked very well. AF was a bit slower than 18-35 F1.8. Heavy lens, especially with D500. Thank you for sharing your experience with OM-1 and PL ...
-
Before I bought the R6 I had considered Sony A1 or A9II. The problem with Sony and 3rd party lenses is, the system slows down FPS. What is the point of buying potential 20 / 30 FPS, when with ...
-
Nothing is lost in our world. I have had the R6 for 2 years. Great camera indeed. The IQ quality is superb, especially when compared with D500, A7R3 and A6600 I had. When I took it to shoot some ...
-
Since I saw a conversion from pizza to a sexy model on YT every picture might be improved. AI can generate picture according to written description. What is the point of taking proper pictures in ...
-
Fake bokeh / blurry background looks artificial to me. I know many viewers would never notice.
-
Only this picture IMO is acceptable sharp enough. The rest taken with Olympus suffer from motion blur or else. R5, maybe due to higher resolution, seem sharper.
-
I allowed myself to download some high ISO pictures and played with them in LR (update was necessary, indeed). I am stunned how potent OM-1 is, as far as high ISO. Much better than A6600 (quite ...
-
My understanding is, that LR butchers files from OM-1, doesn’t it?
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
747 |
Threads started |
107 |
Last post |
11 hours ago |
Photos uploaded |
7 |
Last upload |
Dec 5, 2020 |
|