Tommy S

Not true - I have R6 and 12FPS work (green plus) till the battery falls around 12%. I shot loads of pics with only one battery during the whole day of horse show or skimboarding tournament. My 128 ...

I am far from starting the "every cook praises his own broth" war. There is a significant generation gap between A7/R/3 and Canon R6. R6 has 20 FPS ES with RS and cannot compete against A9/II in ...

I do not think Sony A74 may compete against R6 apart from higher MPX power. AF-C /12FPS in R6 is at the level of Sony A9I/II and I do not think Sony would jeopardize its own siblings. For many A73 ...

I do not have 100% hit rate, but my subjects move faster than a badminton player. I do not think that my R6 helps me cheat. It is a great camera, but the operator still needs to predict the ...

I do not think anybody can reasonably depreciate RF lenses, but they are designed for more demanding sensors (R5 or R) than less demanding such as R6.

Thank you for a substantial input. Yes - I started a thread about RF 28-70 F2.0 to learn that RF 70-200 is better.

This 24-70F2.8 USM II I already have it, nut am tempted to exchange it for 28-70 for the benefits of being fitter, having better low light control, better bokah, and more artistic look of ...

Oh gosh - I am pretty fit, so the weight is not an issue - otherwise I would not be considering such a humongous glass.

It is all about ergo, when I need to hold it for the whole day to track moving objects. I spent 2 days with 100-400 USM II and the focus ring at the end and a pretty long throw is not what I ...

I ditched the idea of having RF 70-200 due to its long and cumbersome focus ring. This video convinced me to buy EF 70-200 USM II For shots like this below I need a shorter zoom, and RF 28-70 F2 is ...

I am tempted to buy this humongous glass, but I read in a thread @Canon EOS R an opinion expressed by an advanced amateur, that 28-70 tends to have some AF speed issues with fast moving objects. ...

True. I rented 100-400 USM II and the statistics said 83% of my 5000 pics are below 200mm. I do not shoot wildlife. For sure in action such as air show, long FL would be helpful. I was debating ...

For my kind of photography I cannot imagine any better gear within a budget I spent so far. Of course, there are better cameras on the market, It is hard for me to think of anything I am missing ...

According to pure MTF, Tamron is on par with EF 70-200 USM II. I know it surpasses Canon with IS, but R6 has IBIS already, so does it matter? From my point of view, AF-C/tracking is critical, and I ...

I second the opinion of 100-400 USM II. Great lens, with great AF and sharpness. I played with it and R6 for a couple of days and results are awesome. As 100-400 is too long on both ends for me I ...

If I got R5 I would combine it with fast lenses such as 70-200 F2.8 USM II and for longer reach just add tele x1.4 or even x2. R5 gives great downsampling advantage, and 2.8 is a great for low ...

Thank you.

So Tamron G2 works in 100% with R6 (12 FPS/Hi+ green mode/AFC)? Good to know it, as I would buy it, instead of 70-200 USM III or Sigma Sports.

I thought you were going to say, that high bursts produce too many pics to watch. I am accustomed to this and always flag in LR my favourite photos right after the session. Then, I always take a ...

From what I experienced with R6, there was no problem for me to keep the pretty fast moving subject in the frame, having enough space for framing and shallow DoF. I even observed, that I tend to ...