Tommy S

I have the same feeling that my GAS will be sated once I fully switch to OM-1 with all lenses I really may ever need in my hobby.

At my desk there are two system now, which I am comparing thoroughly. I am more than impressed how potent the OM-1 is. As I shoot mainly sports/action both indoor and outdoor, I know exactly what ...

My experience with high ISO pics from OM-1 is very positive. I processed pics from DPR studio and DxO RawPure does not make pics too plasticky. However, I read that Topaz has the tendency to make ...

I am waiting for my OM-1 and can't wait till I take it and test it my way. In the meantime I downloaded high ISO files and treated'em with PureRaw. I do not shoot birds or anything, where details ...

PureRaw makes MFT very competitive against other systems.

Hi there I have just tried DxO Pure RAW 2. OMG!!! I must admit that this software blew my mind. I downloaded OM-1's high 12600 ISO RAWs and let the DxO do its job. I downloaded some high ISO ...

I wonder if there are any other photo brands, where users migrate back and forth? I have been the R6 user for 2 years, thinking of enlarging my photo stable with OM-1 and some fast zooms (10-25 / ...

That is the first thing one must do when switching from a system to a system. As I am demanding enthusiast I am 50/50 as far as upgrading my photo stable. Needing the second body I probably accept ...

You can read thousands of reviews and opinions, but the best way to see if you like the system is to try it. I downloaded loads of OM-1's RAWs to see how much I can push them through the LR. I know ...

Hi there I have FW 1.3.1 in the R6 and I wonder if updating will kill my Samyang RF 14 F2.8, making it redundant? Now they both work well. I am shooting karate tournament this coming Saturday and ...

Tokina 11-20 F2.8. I used this lens with Sony A6600 with great results, especially sharpness.

OM-1 with 12-40 is lighter and smaller than R6 (my perspective) and RF 24-70. OM-1 with 40-150 F2.8 Pro is on par with R6 and RF 70-200 F4. I also did the same homework ;-) I have had R6 for 2 ...

I used to have 50-100 F1.8 adapted to Sony A6600. It worked very well. AF was a bit slower than 18-35 F1.8. Heavy lens, especially with D500. Thank you for sharing your experience with OM-1 and PL ...

Before I bought the R6 I had considered Sony A1 or A9II. The problem with Sony and 3rd party lenses is, the system slows down FPS. What is the point of buying potential 20 / 30 FPS, when with ...

Nothing is lost in our world. I have had the R6 for 2 years. Great camera indeed. The IQ quality is superb, especially when compared with D500, A7R3 and A6600 I had. When I took it to shoot some ...

Since I saw a conversion from pizza to a sexy model on YT every picture might be improved. AI can generate picture according to written description. What is the point of taking proper pictures in ...

Fake bokeh / blurry background looks artificial to me. I know many viewers would never notice.

Only this picture IMO is acceptable sharp enough. The rest taken with Olympus suffer from motion blur or else. R5, maybe due to higher resolution, seem sharper.

I allowed myself to download some high ISO pictures and played with them in LR (update was necessary, indeed). I am stunned how potent OM-1 is, as far as high ISO. Much better than A6600 (quite ...

My understanding is, that LR butchers files from OM-1, doesn’t it?