justmeMN

Joined on Apr 6, 2011

Comments

Total: 1495, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: Absolute madness that this costs $6.595.00

@Poweruser: The Canon M10 is only $450. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 23:40 UTC
On article Leica announces M10 with new sensor, slimmer design (50 comments in total)

(being silly) What a rip-off. The Canon M10 only costs $450.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 23:27 UTC as 7th comment

Yay dog photo. No camera review is credible without one. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 20:15 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply

So, for $1,100 you get a "mediocre lens", "heavy noise reduction in JPEGs", and "yellows have greenish tint which affects skin tones".

No thank you.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 16:36 UTC as 48th comment | 1 reply
On article Got focal range? Canon 24-105mm F4L II sample gallery (86 comments in total)

No dog photos, no sale. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 14:41 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM gallery updated (25 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tan68: More dog pics

There have recently been a lot of dog pics
I think someone a campaign against the cat

If the dogs could be taught to ride a bike... :^)

"If the dogs could be taught to ride a bike"

Would a skateboarding Sheltie suffice?

TWIG SKATES FORT LAUDERDALE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-o32te-fME

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 19:25 UTC
On article Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM gallery updated (25 comments in total)

When I go to the local zoo, they won't even let me play Frisbee Fetch with the wolves. Jerks. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 17:21 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply

Is Nikon going to simultaneously live-stream the Putin Victory Celebration?

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 03:44 UTC as 74th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS II USM sample gallery (131 comments in total)

Yay, wolves! :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 14:14 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

mandm: 1.12.2017 17:14
The San Francisco district attorney’s office sued Lily Robotics on Thursday over claims that the San Francisco drone maker engaged in false advertising and unfair business practices.
“It does not matter if a company is established or if it is a startup,” “Everyone in the market must follow the rules. By protecting consumers, we protect confidence in our system of commerce.”
Lily booked 60,000 advance orders at $499 to $899 each. Gascón’s office obtained an order from a judge requiring the company to return all the money it received from orders to customers and not use it for other purposes.
The company had used customer money to secure a $4 million bank loan. The suit also alleges that customers had “considerable trouble” requesting refunds and that Lily has “lost contact with a high percentage of its preorder customers.”
More info at: http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Drone-maker-Lily-Robotics-sued-by-San-Francisco-DA-10854413.php

"After conducting what it said was a months-long investigation, the office alleged that Lily lured customers with a promotional video that was actually filmed by a “much more expensive, professional camera drone that requires two people to operate.” - the article

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 03:46 UTC
In reply to:

Albert Silver: Says it all:

"Officially you own any original pictures and videos you post, but we are allowed to use them, and we can let others use them as well, anywhere around the world. Other people might pay us to use them and we will not pay you for that."

The official teen-language response should be something like:

"OMG, what a rip-off!"

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 17:36 UTC
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

guamy: Lens error on my canon s100 hasn't fix yet, now this one might be a failure again.

I hope that problem is a thing of the past. The original G9 X has been out for more than a year, and I don't recall reading any complaints about that.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 02:25 UTC

But do DxOMark Sensor Scores reflect real world results?

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 20:26 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply

Yay!

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 19:02 UTC as 118th comment
On article Meet two nomadic photographers who travel full-time (149 comments in total)

Is it just me, or is this video pretty pretentious?

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 17:45 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies

[Slide 3] It's cool that Canon is actually shipping something as exotic as a 4 million ISO color movie camera.

[Slide 2] Their prototype for a 250MP still camera could use some improvements in ergonomics. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 01:57 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply

In addition, Nikon had a special empty display case, where their DL cameras were supposed to be. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2017 at 20:45 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

fedway: OK, so how are you supposed to tell a Mark I from a Mark II, when a retailer tries to sell you an old one at the new price?

The "Mark II" is printed on the top plate of the camera. It's easier to see on the black versions of the camera. In DPR's slides, lighting wiped out the gray-on-silver text.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2017 at 01:42 UTC
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bjrn SWE: Where is the viewfinder?

The viewfinder is on the Canon G5 X.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 21:03 UTC
On article CES 2017: Hands-on with the Kodak Super 8 (413 comments in total)

This appears to be a product of "real Kodak", rather than a company they sold their brand name to.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 20:57 UTC as 119th comment
Total: 1495, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »