9VIII

Since DR is technically a matter of "noise" and not just "Electron Well Capacity" (pixel size), equivalent dynamic range on Crop would require outright superior sensor tech on the Crop sensor that ...

As far as I know the X-T3 is the first camera ever to support TWO actual UHS-II SD card slots. Not even the Sony A9 has that. So as of now, for the best performing professional sports and action ...

I know one is retrofocusing and the other isn't. Short flange reduces complexity by a lot.

https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00014K3WU/stuffedpeng0a "This Zuiko Digital Lens use a precision aluminum alloy lens barrel and is half the size of its 600mm 35mm equivalent" http://www.ca ...

33mm f1.0 lenses are already popular, this isn't about Fuji chasing something, the market has already demonstrated demand is there.

Theoretically the 33mm f1.0 should cost less than the 56mm f1.2. We have tons of cheap 33mm f1.0 Manual Focus lenses on the market now, the glass just isn't that big, it's all a matter of ...

As long as you use glass 1 stop faster on Fuji, and that glass is sufficiently sharp, then they could very well end up perceptibly the same. This is the driving premise of a "Professional" Crop system.

The 200mm f2.0 allows Fuji to participate at major global sporting events. Basically it's an advertising tool. Canon and Nikon bring millions of dollars of glass to major sporting events just to ...

If they rig it up with a proper heat sink, yes, the omission of IBIS is a good move. Action shooters can't use IBIS anyway, and this probably cuts $200 off the price.

Deal of the Year was when they were selling the X-E2 at clearance prices.

Good for you, some people get half a million miles on their car without a breakdown too. Which is completely beside the point. Someday, IBIS Will Fail. As it stands the people promoting IBIS and ...

The real question here is “should there ever be a budget EOS R?” Of course we already have EOS-M so “theoretically” there’s no reason to put APS-C on EOS R, but thus far we’ve seen no indication ...

No. It’s incredibly ironic how some people (*cough* Rishi *cough*) will extol the virtues of Mirrorless as being “Free of Mechanical Components”... And then praise -THE MOST COMPLICATED MECHANISM ...

Poll from Fujirumors: https://www.fujirumors.com/poll-what-should-fujifilm-do-against-canon-nikon-sony-panasonic-and-olympus/ From what I can see, this mostly hinges on the performance of their ...

Canon really should have had the 5DS sensor in a cheaper body by now, but there’s so little competition the 5DS keeps running strong as the IQ King for static subjects. I’m also watching Crop ...

Nikon 1 was a great idea except that they tried to charge way too much for it when the sensor was a huge downgrade for most applications. M4/3 can get away with what they do becuase of the movie ...

It’s still too small for the 45mm sensors in most “Medium Format” cameras, but absolutely Nikon needs to get a 40-42mm sensor in the Z-Mount ASAP.

Isn’t the title of this thread is supposed to read “Mirrorless Interchangable Lense Full Frame”?

I was just thinking about how much I wish the new 500f5.6 was a native Z mount camera, with the new mount being so beefy it would be better to have large lenses mount to it natively. But if we must ...

I want Medium Format for under $3K. Start with 35mm for your "sports" model and go straight to a 45mm sensor for landscape shooters. Make all Short Flange lenses 45mm compatible (35mm is the new ...