Lives in France Burgundy, France
Works as a Geologist
Joined on Mar 10, 2009


Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (542 comments in total)

I own the ZS100 and love it. Still, can't feel excited about its so-called successor. I pass.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 01:49 UTC as 119th comment

... and at the end of the day, this is how you get people to like what you want them to like: by showing them first and foremost what everybody likes.
Self-fulfilling prophecy at its best.

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2017 at 09:11 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

justinwonnacott: does this work with LR4?

Yep. PS CS6 + LR4.1RC2 = no problem.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 01:06 UTC

"Lightroom 4 and ACR 6.7 could render files differently."

Afaik, ACR 6.7 "could" not do anything as it's not out yet... :D
Must be tricky to fix discrepancies between not-yet-finalized products...

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2012 at 00:40 UTC as 6th comment

In a different field, my moderate use of HDR processing met with some success in "improving" to some extent photos of geological outcrops - e.g. fusing exposures to even the contrast of shadowy vs. sunny surfaces while enhancing local detail not originally obvious due to technical limitations.
The purpose in such a case is definitely to maximize the rendition of photographic information and to emphasize relevant features. Regarding the later publishing process, this has been deemed both acceptable and useful so far.
As pointed out the method is not inherently right or wrong, it is after all a (moral, personal) matter of what one's ultimate goals and ideals are. Out of integrity, being faithful to a 'true-to-life' combination of digicam abilities, photographer's skills and environmental parameters? Being truly artistic, impressing one's audience even if departing substantially from reality? Maximizing the transmission of useful, relevant, specific raster data?

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2012 at 07:41 UTC as 97th comment
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5