KevinRA

Not easy this one for me - I've had 2 copies of the 15-45 (unfortunately had to return the first good copy as was with a kit and a faulty M6II) and both were OK, the 2nd seems not quite as good as ...

+1

Hi Usable definitely yes - just bought one used and it works pretty well, including for semi-close up work at 250mm.  It's not as sharp as the best lenses, but works quite nicely. A bit of ...

Neither. f/11 is too slow. If they did a 600mm f/8 DO which was highly portable, perhaps.

+1 +1 Yes a key advantage as I see it - it's like a slow and leisurely 7DII in terms of "reach" as one can get the same image essentially by simply cropping the APS-C centre of frame … but if a ...

Ok,, suggestion is based simply on the quality of output of the optics - essentially the same.....and a thought around potential compatibility. I've owned both and cant tell any difference myself ...

Hi owned both and both nice lenses. The IS is a useful feature on the 10-18 (but you are tripod mounted) and it's smaller.... but both a good choice... and the 10-18 used can be quite cheap. Really ...

Hi That's very odd, I'd expect it to communicate with your cameras as they do operate AF at f/8 - and then sigma and tamron lenses "lie" to the camera saying they are f/5.6 lenses at the tele-ends, ...

LOL ;-) - yes I do including with the M3

Totally agree ;-)  Only just sold my 20D when I downsized to M series for weight/size/features. struggle to see this other than a few niche things (which I'd use my M6II or lowly DSLRs for and not ...

Everyone's mileage will vary.....   And nobody will say it is a R5 or 1DX2 - the extreme language saying the camera is completely useless is the only thing I still challenge - let's be honest on a ...

Hi You can infact get away with under-exposing more at low ISO's with the 90D versus older cameras - provided the ISO low - check out the review - but yes under-exposing at higher ISOs not a great ...

true - but no problem in landscape / stills same as the other 24MP canon APSCs - most people inc DPreveiw said was quite good. I think every bit as good as other older canon sensors works fine for ...

Harsh.... Takes very nice images I think, just not for action photography. Got mine for a great price used to complement M6II / save lens changes.

Hi Looks similar to my M6 II with sharpening - (same sensor). On a pixel-level yes some noise can show - it comes from having the same density as micro-four-thirds cameras.... (which the 4/3 fan ...

Would question this conclusion -  without testing against the Canon Mark II version, used by people for years pre the mark III and most test sites say any improvement if at all is just incremental?

Cant judge much - both look substantially over-sharpened when zooming in - would need ones with less post processing to tell really IMHO  - YMMV

I'd say minimal reason - you might just detect it if really lucky on viewing 200% on a perfect test chart set up ......  YMMV

Guessing meaning 23-27 megabyte JPEG at full resolution, minimum compression.  Lots of detail a plus to me not a downside ;-)   If we want no compression then good old fashioned .tif or .psd.  So ...

TDP dont have this finding - https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=278&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=1&API=0&LensComp=978&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=7&APIC ...