KevinRA

Thanks ;-)  What was the detour in DXO?  How did it help you vs LR/PS?

? Sigma 50-150 f/2.8  and Sigma 50-100 f/1.8? Both have had AF accuracy issues reported on DSLRs but hopefully much better on mirrorless.  Heavy though, but so are some of your lenses above. Tamron ...

Border line I think.  I found for my purposes I did not really need the IS on the 85 f/1.4 but missed it on a 200 2.8 non IS prime when I owned it.  Half thinking about a 135 f/2 myself.

Yes - rented it for the M6II for work in low light photographing badgers and pine martens at close range. Very nice combo and purple fringing cleared up OK in lightroom. Quite large and expensive - ...

https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-R5.aspx Note that RAW and C-RAW have 14-bit A/D conversion with mechanical and electronic 1st curtain shutter, 13-bit in H+ mode, and 12-bit ...

Not seen it but not tested for it directly - I think probably from what published wont be much of an issue for wildlife photography which tends to be ISO 200+ not the ISO 100 where biggest ...

Nice capture - just arguably would be better if focus point further forward - easy in hindsight on a forum though.

Nice capture ;-)

+1 Agree.

Great compromise for great pictures and wishing you happy photography - enjoy ;-)

consensus looks like: EF-S 55-250 STM = good compromise pretty sharp and reasonably light option on M. If purely weight and size then need to drop further to 200mm with the EF-M 55-200 (OK but ...

LOL ;-) good point, meant full zoom ;-)

I owned very briefly a copy of the 70-300 IS mark 1 - and it was noticeably soft at f/5.6 300mm even at 18 megapixels 7D. It needed f/9 to be half decent. Whereas my 55-250 STM is acceptably sharp ...

Doubt even if/when the R7 appears it will be initially be < $1500 - maybe eventually a R10 series just might be - of course all guess work. M6ii does AF very well and I find pairs great with the ...

ignore it. Shallow depth of field telephoto work which this lens shines at you wont be able to detect any effect I'd suggest https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/10/front-element-scratches/ https: ...

Do you own a R5? Or repeating just forum statements 2nd hand?  Perfection = No but cant see anything from professional reviewers as a major issue other than overheating in 8K video.  Not denying ...

optically as a former owner of the mk1 and current mk2 - Bare lens - both very nice and hard to tell apart - with 1.4X TC on a dense pixel camera like a 7D or 5DSR, some softening on the mk1 - mk2 ...

Well it kind has close - in that these lenses really equate to F/5.6 lens on a micro four thirds system at 300mm to 400mm. F/11 is far too dark for me and if I wanted that level of performance ...

Just out of interest - how were the other shots in this burst sequence?  If this the only real problem one??

It should work really well with the 1.4X TC - the 2X TC will also work well if you just stop down to ~ f/7.1 and AF better than on DSLRs most likely.    (Caveat, Not tried the exact combination on ...