JayPhizzt

The X-S10 of course has a bigger grip and it's lighter, but else the X-T4 is superior in just about every way. Better build quality, weather sealing, dual card slots, more fps, better battery, ...

I doubt he has two copies of each lens, though :P

I've had the X-trans3 sensor and now I have X-trans4 and there is no difference between them except that X-trans4 has a bit better dynamic range, like I mentioned. There is in general very little ...

I definitely believe there can be a difference in the JPG rendering, like I said. There is however very little to no difference in the RAW files, except that the X-trans4 sensor has a bit better ...

Not obvious at all. Aside from noise and dynamic range there are very small differences between sensors in general. My guess is that this is about a difference in JPG rendering or perhaps white ...

Different in what way exactly? There can of course be some difference in JPG rendering. There might also be a difference in white balance. Or perhaps you're using different film simulations?

dmanthree: I don't know what reviews you've read, but most reviews I've read of it deem it as an excellent lens. Some even say it's one of the best ultra wide angle zooms ever made. The image...

To be fair most macro lenses have quite poor AF performance at macro distances. However the AF on the Fuji 80mm isn't that bad. I've definitely used worse. Macro shooters often tend to use MF, ...

The new one will be F1.2. It's the same as with the 50/1.8 vs the 50/1.2.

Personally I don't think that the 16/1.4 is heavy, but I'm used to much heavier lenses. I have Fuji's 80mm macro for example :P The 14/2.8 is very light, though.

At the moment there are only the Z50 and Zfc mirrorless APS-C cameras, so those two are the closest. They might not be better than the D7200 or D7500 in every way, but it all depends on what ...

I have the 16/1.4 which I use for landscape and it's excellent. It's really sharp, has very high contrast and is distortion free. There is of course also the 14/2.8 like you mentioned which also ...

I would honestly recommend you to stick with only the camera and lens for the time being and really learn how to use them, that's the most important thing for taking/making great photos. When you ...

I never said you should. You should of course use whatever you prefer. I just meant that C1 doesn't have the best demosaicing. I use C1 myself because I think RawTherapee's UI sucks. I really wish ...

I don't agree. If you want the best X-trans demosaicing use RawTherapee. I've done comparisons between bayer and X-trans files in Capture One and bayer files definitely look better in it.

Of course I edit the RAW files and then export as JPG when I want to post them online. All RAW converters have different demosaicing, even for regular bayer files, so there can be differences there ...

First of all sharpness is an almost entirely lens sided characteristic and has little to do with the camera/sensor. Fuji's lenses generally range from good to fantastic so that's definitely not a ...

Depth of field differences really and not bokeh, although the depth of field can of course affect the bokeh to some degree. That you'd get brighter photos sounds very odd. Sounds more like a ...

You mean the 50mm F2, right? The 18/2 isn't bad, but it's one of Fuji's least good lenses. The upside is of course that it's very small. Personally I'd go with the 16/2.8 and the 50/2. Both have ...

dmanthree: perhaps you've missed the Nikon Z 14-30/4, it weighs only 485g. It's also much cheaper than the Canon RF 14-35/4.