JayPhizzt

To be honest the difference in resolution between the X-T4 and the 5DmkIV is pretty small :P However resolution is only one part of the equation, having a sharp lens will of course also make a big ...

Sounds odd about the camera booting up so slow. Never had that problem with any of my cards. I currently have a couple of Sony cards and I've had both Sandisk and Kingston cards in the past and ...

Nice photo, but there is however some severe watercolor effect in it :( Sure, it's not that visible when viewing the photo naturally at small-ish sizes, but once you start enlarging it. Is it a ...

As always it depends on your needs and preferences. Sure, the 16-55/2.8 will give you an improvement in IQ over the 18-55/2.8-4 and of course the constant F2.8. And then you of course also have ...

Only problem with this is that sharpness and contrast are almost entirely lens sided characteristics and don't really have much to do with the camera at all. Except of course for whatever software ...

Well, I'd say all(or most at least) will process X-trans files, it's a question of how well they do it. Personally I use Capture One which does a good job with X-trans files. ON1 Photo Raw is also ...

Generally for landscape I would say you tend to shoot wide, but there are of course times when you might want to use longer focal lengths as well. So I'd say it's good to have both. Your 18-55mm ...

Most of the IQ lies in the lens so it's the lens you should be impressed by ;) Unless you're specifically referring to noise and/or dynamic range, of course. Both the F1.4 and F2 versions of the ...

1. The amazing lenses. My current Fuji lenses are the best lenses I've ever had. 2. The dials/retro design. I've never shot analog/film, but I absolutely love the dials. It's so intuitive and ...

You forgot the battery :)

It's suppose to be a bit better. Would be terrible if it was actually worse :P It's also possible that the X-T3 will get the X-T4 AF algorithms in the future.

Did you not read what I said? There are no "modes" on most of Fuji's cameras as they don't use the typical PASM setup. You change every setting individually, that's how you shoot "manual". Feels a ...

Well, that's kind of the point with Fuji, there are no "modes"(except on their cheaper models). They're designed more like analog cameras where you change every setting individually. If you want ...

Yes, the depth of field of course affects the appearance of the bokeh. The posters question was however more specifically about the possible difference in depth of field between two lenses and he ...

Don't know how you managed to miss these lenses as they're well known and have been talked about a lot online. There are also plenty of reviews of them. There is also going to be a 56/1.4 and an ...

Well, the thread is really more about depth of field than bokeh.

Also with the new battery. It wouldn't surprise me if they went this route the same way they did with X-T3 > X-T4.

Well, they didn't really scrap the 33/1, but rather changed it to 50/1. As for which lens will get an MKII version my guess goes for either the 18/2 or the 27/2.8.

I would love to see that Fuji 10mm F2 lens that was in some poll a while back. If it had top-notch IQ, minimal distortion and wasn't too heavy I'd get one in a heart beat.

Well, for some reason when you view photos naturally in C1 they look a bit soft. When viewed at 100% however you get full quality. This is something I've always wanted them to fix, but they still ...