peter42y

Lives in Portugal lisbon, Portugal
Joined on Aug 23, 2009

Comments

Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

photography is losing with this iphone maniawhich I do not understand. People cannot even download stuff ftom the web with those iphones,neither have they usb connection

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 15:30 UTC as 1st comment
On photo BETASAMPLE_ISO800_SAM_0451-ACR in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

looks very nice

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 15:13 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Samsung NX1 Real-world Samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

looks very nice

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 15:13 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Littlestone Beach in Mikey64's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

wonderful picture.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2014 at 00:02 UTC as 1st comment
On photo P1010095 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Great picture indeed

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 14:20 UTC as 3rd comment
On a photo in the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Samples Gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Great picture indeed

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 14:20 UTC as 3rd comment
On article CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sigma DP2 Quattro (249 comments in total)

It looks the engineers in charge of the development of the camera did smoke weed in the morning they decided about its final design. I though DP cameras were supposed to be small. Look how huge the camera is !!! Besides the ugly grip does make the wholle thing even less pocketeable. Will it sell ? No.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 10:29 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

gabriel67: WHY can't they understand.
We expect something closer to Fuji X series!!!
This is the same useless buff they made before but newer..
FAIL

Camera is awesome, Gabriel. Actually I bought 2. If you read reviews of people who actually bought it...,you will see people are happy . Amazon France : Customers give EOS-M 4,5 out of 5 stars. Amazon Germany : 4,5 out of 5. Amazon US : 4 out of 5 stars. I give the camera 4,7 out of 5 stars. Meanwhile your wonderful Fuji X has backfocus issues, acording to some.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2014 at 22:01 UTC
On article PPE 2013: Hands-on with Panasonic's newest cameras (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

rdscibilia: What about comparing this to the EOS M.

EOS-M is a wonderful camera. And the turtle flash is not so slow after the firmware upgrade. EOS-M was maligned. That was nice for th people who bought one. they got a wonderful nice, incredible camera for the price of a point and shoot. I have one,yes.

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2013 at 17:16 UTC
In reply to:

HomoSapiensWannaBe: I know it isn't as compact, but $99 more gets me the X-A1 with a 16-50 lens, much larger sensor, handgrip, hot shoe, tiltable rear LCD and many other benefits. Still, this is progress compared to the XF-1, though I liked the manual zoom ring on that.

I did not like Xa1 samples. For less money you get the canon eos-m , with an apcs sensor.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 05:50 UTC
On article First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 (353 comments in total)
In reply to:

2001: When I bought my G9 it was the compact camera of choice., it could shoot raw, it had full manual controls and a magnesium aloy body. It was one of a few compacts a professional photographer considered. This was in 2007. For me this is where my interest in the G series ended, although still excellent cameras , compact iLCs with aps c sensors and interchangeable lenses and being able to use old Lieca , Contax and Angenieux lenses via adapter for the same price as G series camera ended my enchantment. I remember the outrage when the G7 didn't shoot raw. Given that the new bodies are plastic, the price is high and the sensors are small and they are made for professionals who are aware of all this, I wonder how they even sell at all. The blunders of the EOS M and now this ? Can't Cannon at least put an aps-c sensor to at least make it worth looking at ? Cannon has more than proven they make excellent ones. can't imagine buying this camera, I think others feel the same. 9 fps per second is nice but not enough of a rationale to get the camera. Is Cannon asleep? Is a stubborn moron in market research holding everyone hostage at Cannon ? Are they trying to lose a lot of money and reap the rewards of an obscure subsidy or stock option of some kind? I really can't account for any reasons Canon has for making an obsolanete camera and figure out why anyone would want to buy it? I remember when Canon made the best cameras on the market from the 1980's until now. Nikon and Sony are catching up and in some ways even surpassing Canon. Canon's response seems to be bending over backwards to fail. Hopefully Canon will wake up, otherwise the mid 2000's will be remembered as a once great maker a remembered fondly in spite of it's failures like a Voightlandänder and the German camera industry before they lost out to the Japanese in the early 70's

Hi : You ask :" Can't Cannon at least put an aps-c sensor to at least make it worth looking at ? ".
G1X has an APS-C sensor.., and was not popular !!!
People complained a lot.
The G series at the time , sold much better than the aps-c canon which was the canon G1X.
In fact the september 2011 when a small sensor G was due , canon did not launch any G small sensor camera.
January 2012 G1X was launched.

It was a flop

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 15:23 UTC
On article First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 (353 comments in total)
In reply to:

Musikboy: Surprised at how Canon keeps ignoring the market overall. Still one more iteration without a 24mm wide lens, still just 12mp and a small sensor compared to the now leading RX-100 cameras. Still too heavy, still too big.

Just my opinion.

I also 100% agree with whataboutraw.
The g12/ g15,,etc continue to be very popular. This is the reason canon does continue to make them.
When it does come to more pixels in a small sensor..,canon make a good move.
Less pixels are better.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 14:53 UTC
On article Nikon AW1 First Impressions Review (590 comments in total)

I guess this new camera is an acknowledgement that the initial V1 , was not a success. ( In fact their price did drop a lot).
I do not think this camera will be a sucess either.
How many people do underwater photography ? Not many.
The demand will be therefore rather small I believe .
Let us see.
BTW : I am a V1 owner but I bough it at a heavily discounted price.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 14:47 UTC as 25th comment | 4 replies
On article First look: Sony QX10 and QX100 mobile cameras (45 comments in total)

i do not see this product being successful. People use smart phones in their pockets. Smart phones with huge lenses are not practical. Casual shooters will never use them .And people really interested in photography will prefer to carry real cameras.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 22:04 UTC as 12th comment
On article iPhone rumors heat up (8 comments in total)

That is what I think jcm. These cameras are not good. And the i phones cost hundreds of bucks !!!! As camera devices these phones suck in low light at least. No zoom. ...;

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 03:04 UTC as 5th comment
On GalleryItem:2526002 (1 comment in total)

It does look very nice indeed

Posted on Apr 28, 2013 at 03:03 UTC as 1st comment
On photo R0150287 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Huge distortion

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 03:26 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Ricoh GR Review Samples sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Huge distortion

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 03:26 UTC as 2nd comment
Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »