quiquae

If you feel your qualifications and background help this discussion, please feel to provide them. In their absence, your writing can only be judged on what it says. Yet he apparently trusts this ...

You're entitled to your opinion, but it's intellectually dishonest to quote someone else as a supporting evidence when you know that someone else has retracted his claim.

M2 and M10 have more or less the same sensor. Be aware, though, that M2 isn't supported by some RAW converters, most notably Capture One Pro. Check your favorite software's support list before ...

Your information is outdated. If you go to the next page on that site, you'll see this:

The prices I see now for good ones are more like $800-900. I wouldn't sell mine for anywhere near $400 unless it has a scratch on the sensor or something.

@Bobthearch A submarine.

@toliman
If you can point to some instructions on getting > 1:1 magnification with a compact super-zoom, I'd appreciate it.

Since JPEG only allows 8 bit depth maximum, even a lossless JPEG represents loss of data compared to RAW, which is usually 12 to 14 bits.

Is that important? Well, I guess it depends.

Is there supposed to be any difference in processing? The only item on the change log is addition of EOS M100 support.

1) No flash (built-in or hotshoe)
2) Fixed f/4 aperture (that's right, you can't stop down!)
3) No image stabilization

I'm sure it's a fine device for its intended use, but a travel camera it's not.

http://www.itmedia.co.jp/ publishes a weekly ranking of ILC sales in Japan (in Japanese, which is why I didn't post the link initially).

Oh, I can think of lots of reasons why I'd want to use ISO 12800 or even 25600 on APS-C. Whether I should is a completely different issue, and the answer is probably "no," but why blame him for trying?

@CCD FTW Apology not accepted. You owe me a different apology, for attacking me with irrelevant character assassination ("rabidly follow") instead of admitting you shouldn't have pontificated on...

@CCD FTW
M10 has been in the top 10 ranking in Japan consistently since Jan-Feb of this year. But carry on, don't let facts get in the way of your version of reality.

7D2 has the same feature.

You can easily see the dust and wear on the side of the pentaprism box without any enhancement. The thumbnail photo is clearly that of an old film Zenit.

@Triplet Pelar
Well, Sony was not too vain to allow Hasselblad to rebadge their mirrorless. Why not Zenit?

@Richard Murdey
YI's camera is MFT, not APS-C. (which still doesn't rule them out)

It's really just personal preference between one stop faster vs. smaller.

Personally I chose the 35mm, because a) f/2, and b) the 28mm frame of view doesn't feel differentiated enough from my...

@Kaso
Interestingly, in Japan, the hood comes with the lens. At least it did when I bought this lens in 2014.
(This is not generally the case. In my experience, the non-L kit zooms the 50mm STM,...

I have both the 16-35F4LIS and the 35IS to go with a 6D. The 16-35 actually has very good IQ at 35mm-difference is acceptably small even at f/4, and becomes even less as you stop down--but it's...