fogtownphotos

You absolutely made the case for the lens! I think the individual photographer's use will decide the aperture question. As a wedding photographer, my ability to make everything look "dreamy" with ...

What about a Z7II?

I can speak to the quality of the 105, but the depth of field isn't even as shallow as the Z 85 1.8 S, let alone the 85 1.4. I'm holding onto that and also the 105... though unless I NEED shallow ...

This photo proves the point you're making: if the light is good, the photographer makes it professional. What a fantastic shot that I am certain this family will love.

I think the eye focus on the current 6/7 II is fine, but I agree with the need for Nikon to make some steps in the video department to keep/catch up. That said, I expect this is what the Z6III ...

Can confirm: the marks against the TC-2.0x are overstated. Is it as sharp as a prime or even as excellent as the 70-200S without a TC? No, but it's still very good and more than usable. And agreed ...

Wildlife is absolutely outside of my bag, but I can imagine it’s not possible. As to human action, I’m able to hit over 90% with HS level athletes. Stick with it, it gets easier and better. To ...

This right here. I get the sense anything that requires he put the time into learning a new system is a non-starter. Give it to Sony/Canon: their AF system is relatively dummy proof. The Eye AF in ...

I don't have the same experience. The 24-70 2.8 is fantastic, but my 35 is also rather sharp wide open and certainly sharper than what you're showing here. Perhaps you got a bad copy? Can you do a ...

Looking for comment from those of you who upgraded from the Z6 to the Z6ii and also those of you who have both a Z6ii and a Z5. While I want Nikon to release a body with 10bit 4:2:2 video and ...