Alan Brown

Alan Brown

Lives in United Kingdom Birmingham England, United Kingdom
Works as a Video/Photographer
Joined on Nov 24, 2001
About me:

Basic equipment:
Fuji X-T1
Fuji 35mm f1.4 R
18-55mm OIS
some studio lighting


Total: 141, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

no mention of WB.. or did i miss it :)

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2018 at 16:57 UTC as 17th comment

we're a fickle lot.. if they had successfully gotten it past security people would say the team exposed a weakness that needed fixing!

No 'some' want all of them locked up for 5 years...

go figure.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2018 at 09:09 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

thenoilif: There goes that’s theory that some have that the average person knows nothing about photography lol

Photographers have to really step up their game these days as the average consumer is much more knowledable about photography than ever before. We can thank smartphones for that.

This changes nothing; and it is NOT a theory. I have done wedding photography for 30 years.. the only people you cannot generally satisfy easily are other photographer couples; but then they usually know who they would pick to do their wedding.
ps: sometimes you get people with agendas. They want a discount after the fact or a know all relative stirs the pot for no reason except to display their 'so called' knowledge, but these things are very few and far apart.

I don't think the average consumer knows much about photography at all. (no offence meant or intended) look at some of the often repeated questions put out the forums here and these are users who have bought a 'proper' camera and not a smartphone user.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2018 at 09:05 UTC
In reply to:

Constantine e: this "article" is a total "dirty laundry". this type of gossip articles should not appear on this page. my personal "rating" of dpreview definitely went way down.

Constantine e: Gossip?

meaning:=casual or unconstrained conversation or reports about other people, typically involving details which are not confirmed as true.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2018 at 17:06 UTC
In reply to:

JC Ramos Photography: That's 3 letters away from being called skyrim. Bethesda's gonna sue!

Isn't it two letters away?

Still.. it has bad connotations for me.. too close to another word😮

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2017 at 20:31 UTC

The only people i would not do a shoot or video for is another photographer/videographer.. (naturally they mostly use people they know/trust in the industry).. why? because they are generally the only ones who can see the difference in the gear.
In all of my photo and video work not one client asked or enquired about the gear (before or after the event). The only thing most DID notice was the thing that matters; the story.
It's photos that sell cameras and lenses. How many times you see a photo posted in a forum and people saying they want to buy that same camera or lens because they think they will get the same shots; even from lowly entry level stuff. it's the composition and lighting that gets the attention. look at any entry level camera brochure!

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2017 at 16:28 UTC as 46th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Marty4650: Not too long ago I found this Yashica T4 Super D selling at a Goodwill store for $2.00.

I bought it, then listed it on ebay and got $300 for it.

T4.. a super camera! very fond memories of that camera/lens. even now i look on ebay for a bargain but they are never there .(bargains i mean :)

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 22:13 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (303 comments in total)

i have the original version..... among four other software editor. PS, DXO On1 etc. i find the naming of personas confusing but otherwise it is a well endowed editor.
One thing that got me to try On1 was the shadow recovery quality. many of my editors just seem to lower contrast and leave a haze behind which On1, mostly, doesnt. I found DXO generally good at this, However i find no editor perfect; hence four of them for different reasons :)

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2017 at 17:13 UTC as 81st comment | 2 replies

I agree.. the venom is unpalatable.

I am 'from' Nikon (film and FF digital) to Fuji but only because it suited me. I don't like the 'Fuji is the only brand' even on our own forum. If a mirror less Nikon had been available when i sold my Nikon gear.. it may have stopped me; I don't know now cos it hasn't happened yet :) Other things come into play to.. how much is this new model 'if' it comes, Who will it be aimed at? I actually liked the Nikon 1 ILC (J2) but it didn't seem to have a future. This is welcome news to Nikon owners of an array of expensive FF lenses... (can't see these not being compatible) I also can't be upset that others get another option, can I?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2017 at 16:17 UTC as 193rd comment
In reply to:

Clyde Thomas: PETA,
please explain to the monkey what all happened here.

Clyde: The monkey's lawyers are talking him through it right now.. they are up to 6 hours on the first paragraph... someone's got to do it. How much per hour is that now?.. Monkey says... where's my camera?

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 08:20 UTC

The photographer does not own copyright if he is 'directed'.. i.e. told what to shoot. 'IF' Slater directed the monkey to take the shot.. which I'm sure he did ( :) ).. then he owns the copyright. :)

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 08:15 UTC as 49th comment | 6 replies

I bought this as an expensive full product 2 years ago and spent 6 weeks or so trying just to do simple edits. I tried many tutorials and followed them only to find the system flaky to say the least. Just to get some editing work done I would often just start up Premiere Pro and finish it.
Now after all that time you can get a free albeit cut down version... Only to find that it is exactly the same frustrating flaky rubbish. I updated the program as instructed and still never got a simple edit out of it. Just finished my 1 hour failure and waste of time with it only to do it with Pro in y minutes even with rendering out. Have taken it off my high spec win 10 PC forever.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2017 at 20:18 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

AshMills: Wish I could get my head around DX crop equivalence arithmetic - my simple brain can imagine FF and 2xcrop but I struggle with 1.5 crop. 122mm equivalent lenses dont help! :-)

1 + 1/2 ?
for this example 80 + 1/2 (40) =120mm

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 13:52 UTC
In reply to:

zakaria: Weight and price are the weakest area for this aps/c dfa pentax 100mm is ff lens and almost half of the price and half the weight.

i presume they had their reasons apart from 'how can we make this big and heavy' for our light cameras?
if they specified a certain level of correction, (add your own here) when creating this lens, then some sacrifices have been made; weight, looks to be one of them.
i don't agree that the 'main argument for mirrorless IS smaller lighter. We're all grown up enough to be able to choose whether we buy something or not, aren't we? I admit no system is perfect and i'm certainly not claiming Fuji do everything right at all. None of my previous brands have!

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 13:37 UTC
In reply to:

Father Bouvier: Why does it take a whole 5 days for DPR to reprint an article from petapixel?

On the other note, why would DPR publish materials already available all over the net for days? Aren't they telling us they have little time to do the equipment testing?

i find these things interesting.. i don't trawl loads of other sites, so they effectively filter it for me. thanks DPR

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2017 at 08:13 UTC
In reply to:

davids8560: Finally! A new camera product I fully understand! But why can't they be wiped with hand or tissue? And why aren't they microwave safe? And why must that detail even be spelled out in the product announcement, anyway? Do some people microwave coasters?

yes.. like having to put THIS IS HOT on coffee cups because someone put one between their legs whilst driving ..with their appropriately hot body parts resulting from the spill!

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 21:37 UTC
On article Canon unveils stabilized EF 85mm F1.4L lens (521 comments in total)
In reply to:

breschdlingsgsaelz: I wonder what you need an IS is a 85 f1.4 for? That one will be used for portraits mainly and wide open. I never missed an IS in my 85 1.8 even in low light situations.

What I would buy immediately would be an extender compatible 200mm f2.8 with IS. There it would be very useful and the 70-200 is much too big to haul around in many cases.

someone here has infinite hand holding capability ?

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2017 at 08:29 UTC
On article Nikon D850: First full-res sample images (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

heavymeister: Look at the detail of the blackheads on the model's nose. Nice.

in my experience the photographer wants detail and the client, flattery.

Some of my, shall we say, more plump, brides ask about re-touching and slimming. I always reply that i will go only so far. they must be recognisable by the family!

At least with a high resolution camera/lens you can reduce the detail if required.... but not the other way.. :)

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2017 at 12:11 UTC

with a Fuji X mount.. :)

OMG... with IBIS
Sorry to the Fuji forum.. couldn't resist.

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2017 at 21:36 UTC as 104th comment
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: I want Amazon basic FF camera $99!!!

you mean a rebranded D850?

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2017 at 16:26 UTC
Total: 141, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »