Adam Maas

The X-T3's screen setup is much more usable for tripod work than the X-T100's, particularly when combined with an L-bracket (because the X-T100's screen only flips out in one direction, the X-T3's...

The primary change on the sensor is a much faster readout. That enables both a much higher max framerate (up to 30fps at 1.25 crop, 20fps at full res) and significantly improves AF. It also gets...

2 rings (aperture + focus) takes more space than 1 ring (focus). Especially if the ring is large enough to be usable. A good chunk of the Fujicron's size is about having really usable focus &...

Personally, I love the dials. But camera's are NOT a once size fits all solution. My usage is such that neither the AF mode switching (which is fiddly) nor the drive mode switching (also fiddly)...

Just about every other maker has that split as well. Wide-range F4, narrow-range f2.8. As long as the f4's optically good it gives the landscape guys a lighter, wider ranged options while the more...

The XA's are great little cameras when paired with a wide-ish lens. I've generally loved the XA-1/18 combo as a pocket camera and the 27 and 23/2 both also work well. I expect the 16/2.8 to be a...

Fuji tried the pancake idea with the 27/2.8, while a great lens, it really hasn't been too popular.

The f2's however have been much more successful, and are a good combination of size and...

f2 would require a larger lens, making the 16 f2.8 allows the size to remain small, and if you need more speed there's already an f1.4 option.

The 18-55 is the oldest zoom in the line and has reduced AF performance on the later bodies. Both it and the 55-200 are in need of an update due to AF performance limitations (the 60/2.4 also...

Lessiter.

Based on those tests the 35/2 IS's edge performance on Full frame is comparable to the FA35's performance on APS-C from f2.8 on, on APS-C the 35/2IS always has a performance advantage...

It was optically on par with the equivalents in 2002. Canon has since killed off their old 35/2 and while Nikon will happily still sell you the 35/2D, they've replaced it in the line years...

The thing is that if you're going to hang big f2.8 glass off of it, you are likely better off with a D850 anyways today.

There's a real lack of small but excellent options for the...

The 70-300VR P is good enough on the FTZ that there's little need for a Z native version right now.

I think Nikon's trying to stick to a combo of small/light/great f4's & big/heavy/pro f2.8 zooms...

For the guys who liked the RX1R.

It's going to be a LOT smaller than an A7R3 and any comparable 35mm prime, just like the RX1 series is.

Yep, I did miscalculate the TC factor by a stop.

Note I didn't screw up the crop equation (said it is comparable in performance to a 420mm lens that's one stop slower due to the crop, not that it...

No, it becomes a 280mm f4, which on APS-C is comparable in performance to a 420mm f5.6 on FF (you pay a ~1 stop DoF and noise penalty for the shorter physical focal length and smaller sensor).

They still need to figure out what the use case of galleries is. It still remains a collection of other peoples photography on a site oriented at your own photography.

People ignore the feature...