ears1991

Thanks for the constructive response, will look into those tools! The level of noise here doesn't detract from the overall quality for me personally, vs what looks almost like aggressive jpeg ...

All of the above is 100%, not 200% - which is surely a valid way of evaluating the image? I agree that no one would zoom to 200% and print that zoom. The artifacts I'm trying to highlight are ...

better = more? honestly stunned that the mess on the left image can be defended, whole patches of hair basically blurred into a contigious blob of colour: another example (left is sooc again)

camera is a camera, this one has potential to replace a standalone camera when processing is not overdone in my opinion. if i take a photo, i'd like to know it is suitable quality to print if i ...

?????

interesting, complete opposite to my experience with pixel 6 pro, jpegs were soooo obviously cameraphone photos, at a glance based on excessive HDR and oversaturation, and at 1:1 the over ...

Pretty sure google camera on pixels and probably others is stacking multiple exposures for RAW. Just uploaded an album comparing SOOC jpegs vs lightly processed RAWs on pixel 6 pro, and the ...

Came up with this workflow for dealing with the fact that if you delete a photo from Google Photos, it won't delete the RAW .dng file, leaving a bit of a mess. Linked rather than copy paste in ...