SETI

Lives in Russian Federation Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at http://500px.com/krasitsky
Joined on Apr 26, 2007

Comments

Total: 190, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Roadtrip Review Redux: The Fujifilm X100F (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

KLO82: I don't pixel peep, like never. But many of the images with this article looks mushy even at small size. Don't know if it is me, or something else.

+1

Link | Posted on May 28, 2017 at 14:52 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Olympus C-8080 Wide Zoom (93 comments in total)

That was really best camera for the time! Had one

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 10:28 UTC as 70th comment

Fujifilm GFX makes me sad... Can't look at Panasonic pictures =(

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 10:21 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article Sigma sd Quattro H real world samples gallery (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Very good IQ, especially from Sigma converter. That «awfull grain» is not a problem at all =) I want to own that camera!

Sad news =) Details are amazing!

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 21:18 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel T7i / EOS 800D Sample Gallery (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Very bad IQ. Even m43 looks much better

asshead – just show me your gallery

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 17:33 UTC
On article Sigma sd Quattro H real world samples gallery (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Very good IQ, especially from Sigma converter. That «awfull grain» is not a problem at all =) I want to own that camera!

I see... and no way to remove it in converter?

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 17:31 UTC
On article Sigma sd Quattro H real world samples gallery (108 comments in total)

Very good IQ, especially from Sigma converter. That «awfull grain» is not a problem at all =) I want to own that camera!

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 16:22 UTC as 24th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon EOS Rebel T7i / EOS 800D Sample Gallery (110 comments in total)

Very bad IQ. Even m43 looks much better

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2017 at 15:34 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies

Fantastic ideas =)

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2017 at 18:15 UTC as 51st comment
On article Image style AI can convert paintings to photographs (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ann Chaikin: Wonder what it would do with Picasso or Dali. Could be interesting.

Also Edvard Munch...

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2017 at 11:43 UTC

Too much grain even at base ISO

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 12:26 UTC as 140th comment
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: There's just a certain 'something' about those shots. An aura. A 'feeling.'

It would be ridiculous to suggest that any other manufacturer's camera/lens combinations costing a tenth of the price could create this 'look.'

It's almost like Leica sprinkled a little, well, let's call it 'pixie dust' into their cameras and lenses and that magic travels along the lens to the sensor and is captured along with the rays of light.

Or perhaps the sensor itself contains this pixie dust and thus imbues the image with the 'aura.'

No matter how it works, one can immediately spot this 'Leica look' that no other camera is capable of creating. It positively glows from each image.

Money well spent, I'd say.

HowaboutRAW
LOL =) Leica M is a camera, and if you take it to studio it becomes studio camera... ok, just ask Google «leica M studio shots» and you'll find something interesting!

P.S. Anyways you always can show me your non-studio masterpieces =)

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 23:25 UTC

Facepalm

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 23:18 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
On article Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art sample gallery updated (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

villagranvicent: For Sigma the only criteria to produce a lens is sharpness. They don't care about bokeh, chromatic aberrations, reliable AF mechanisms or anything else. And many of their customers are happy with that.

villagranvicent: absolutely =)

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 15:18 UTC
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: There's just a certain 'something' about those shots. An aura. A 'feeling.'

It would be ridiculous to suggest that any other manufacturer's camera/lens combinations costing a tenth of the price could create this 'look.'

It's almost like Leica sprinkled a little, well, let's call it 'pixie dust' into their cameras and lenses and that magic travels along the lens to the sensor and is captured along with the rays of light.

Or perhaps the sensor itself contains this pixie dust and thus imbues the image with the 'aura.'

No matter how it works, one can immediately spot this 'Leica look' that no other camera is capable of creating. It positively glows from each image.

Money well spent, I'd say.

HowaboutRAW
All I wanna see is YOUR masterpieces made by Leica, – studio portraits, please

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2017 at 13:55 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F pre-production sample gallery (235 comments in total)

Great IQ! But you still can buy red dot from Leica...

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2017 at 13:53 UTC as 72nd comment | 7 replies
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: There's just a certain 'something' about those shots. An aura. A 'feeling.'

It would be ridiculous to suggest that any other manufacturer's camera/lens combinations costing a tenth of the price could create this 'look.'

It's almost like Leica sprinkled a little, well, let's call it 'pixie dust' into their cameras and lenses and that magic travels along the lens to the sensor and is captured along with the rays of light.

Or perhaps the sensor itself contains this pixie dust and thus imbues the image with the 'aura.'

No matter how it works, one can immediately spot this 'Leica look' that no other camera is capable of creating. It positively glows from each image.

Money well spent, I'd say.

It's just a words. No examples. I had M lenses and had film Leica, thanks

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 16:18 UTC
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: There's just a certain 'something' about those shots. An aura. A 'feeling.'

It would be ridiculous to suggest that any other manufacturer's camera/lens combinations costing a tenth of the price could create this 'look.'

It's almost like Leica sprinkled a little, well, let's call it 'pixie dust' into their cameras and lenses and that magic travels along the lens to the sensor and is captured along with the rays of light.

Or perhaps the sensor itself contains this pixie dust and thus imbues the image with the 'aura.'

No matter how it works, one can immediately spot this 'Leica look' that no other camera is capable of creating. It positively glows from each image.

Money well spent, I'd say.

It's always «An aura. A 'feeling.'», when you lost big money, it's kind of mantra for self-excuse =)

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 15:44 UTC
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)

Leica is a dangerous camera to blame... if I say I don't like it's IQ, I'll automatically go to lowlifes, that just «can't afford it». So I'll say just... wow, camera looks great! Is it ok?

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2017 at 12:02 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

SETI: Great colors, but IQ close to my phone. And, btw, my phone is much smaller and lighter =)

davev8
But I can do good photos. Can you?

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 16:50 UTC
Total: 190, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »