SETI

SETI

Lives in Russian Federation Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at http://500px.com/krasitsky
Joined on Apr 26, 2007

Comments

Total: 289, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

AlanG: It looks perfect for when photography is not your main reason for buying a camera.

Best comment! =)

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2017 at 20:26 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix G9 sample gallery (143 comments in total)
In reply to:

Akgbkd: Wow...those low light shots are as good as my smartphone.....

If I will say what he can show I'll be banned.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 09:44 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

nikkol: Feature-wise, M100's direct competitor should be a5100 but not a6000.
Though a5100 is 3 years old and $100 cheaper, its AF still much more capable than M100...

Why do you all speak about ISO, AF speed? My Canons have amazing shots with my adorable Zeiss 100mm f/2. AF speed you say? My best selling photos are all shoot at maximum 1600 ISO. If you're looking for newbie camera, that have magical masterpiece button you really need new modern smartphone. You will get all that portrait, night, firework and other modes! Without any headache.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 09:40 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sidath Senanayake: Why would I get an M100 over a Sony a5100?

If I already had EF-M lenses, then it would be pretty obvious, but if all I have are EF lenses and don't want to use adapters, doesn't the fact that the a5100 has a wider lens selection and costs less mean it would be the better option for a beginner?

I'm not trolling here, I shoot Canon and Sony and would like to know whether I'm missing something here :)

I like that copy-paste messages from sonyboys =) «Why M100 over a5100?». Good sign for Canon!

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 09:39 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

nikkol: Feature-wise, M100's direct competitor should be a5100 but not a6000.
Though a5100 is 3 years old and $100 cheaper, its AF still much more capable than M100...

M100 colors are much better for me.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 09:35 UTC
On article Canon EF-M 22mm F2 STM sample gallery (176 comments in total)

Amazing lens. Love my pocketable combo of M6 and 22mm!

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2017 at 15:35 UTC as 57th comment
In reply to:

SantaFeBill: The Windows beta gave excellent results on some difficult images, so I pre-ordered 2018. The feature set sounds as if it meets well what I want to do, and potentially could replace multiple programs with one. (Not Lr, I'm not a Lr user.)
Of course, the proof for me will be in the RAW conversion - if that's not as good as I get from Photo Ninja, then I'm less interested, as I have other programs already that I can use if I need capabilities beyond PN.

SilvanBromide
Thank you! I don't need filters, I just want to adjust lights, colors and geometry. And also I don't want to step back.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 21:28 UTC
In reply to:

SETI: Tired from Adobe, but can't buy without testing =(

Already have few progamms that I don't need. So «no try, no buy» now =)

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 17:40 UTC
On article Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM sample gallery (319 comments in total)
In reply to:

paul simon king: I’ll certainly try it. The f1.2 mk2 will always
Be unbeatable in bokeh land but focuses too slowly for my liking whereas the 1.8 snaps in super fast. The only advantage I can imagine this lens really has over the others is IS, but that might be a big enough advantage if you shoot high mps and hate tripods

That's right. Best friend for 5Ds/R =)

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 20:54 UTC
On article Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM sample gallery (319 comments in total)

Best colors/sharpness/volume from 5DSr. IMHO
6D mk II is just bad.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 20:53 UTC as 58th comment
On article Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM sample gallery (319 comments in total)
In reply to:

LiangMing: So far, these pictures don't show any difference than the ones coming from much cheaper 85mm f1.8 version. Or the poor pictures are due to the poor 6D MK2 camera?

Anyway, please show more convincing pictures that I can get rid of my old f1.8.

Looks like it's for 5Ds/R – IS is must have for them.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 20:52 UTC
In reply to:

SantaFeBill: The Windows beta gave excellent results on some difficult images, so I pre-ordered 2018. The feature set sounds as if it meets well what I want to do, and potentially could replace multiple programs with one. (Not Lr, I'm not a Lr user.)
Of course, the proof for me will be in the RAW conversion - if that's not as good as I get from Photo Ninja, then I'm less interested, as I have other programs already that I can use if I need capabilities beyond PN.

SantaFeBill
Thanks!

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 19:03 UTC

Tired from Adobe, but can't buy without testing =(

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 19:01 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

SantaFeBill: The Windows beta gave excellent results on some difficult images, so I pre-ordered 2018. The feature set sounds as if it meets well what I want to do, and potentially could replace multiple programs with one. (Not Lr, I'm not a Lr user.)
Of course, the proof for me will be in the RAW conversion - if that's not as good as I get from Photo Ninja, then I'm less interested, as I have other programs already that I can use if I need capabilities beyond PN.

Where did you get Beta? Wanna try it, tired of Adobe.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 18:51 UTC
On article Sony a7R III sample gallery (261 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Sony is great for evening or night shoot. Amazing warm tones, beautiful orange faces =) Yep, even when daytime!

If Sony will have great skintones I'll buy it immediately =)

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2017 at 13:19 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: When you want to use the M100 in average lighting conditions with a lens that isn't faster than f/5.6 , forget the M100.
For instance Iso 2500 1/40s f/5.6 is already a very difficult condition for the M6's autofocus, it often won't focus at all or maybe sometimes after 10 seconds...
Therefore when you use the 15-45mm you can totally forget the autofocus at 45mm in average lighting conditions.
So probably the Ef-s 55-250mm isn't a good choice, too in average lighting conditions.

Have M6 but don't have your problems.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2017 at 23:43 UTC
In reply to:

User0127324968: Would like to see 15-35 f4, 24-70 f4 and 70-200 f4 for pentax full frame.
Lack of this kind of lenses for Pentax is a disaster.

By the way they already have the 55* f1.4!
And the neeeeext summer 50* f1.4.

I think NASA have to give the Mars project to this company!!!

Tired of being a Pentaxian, unfortunately.

Sweet dreams...

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 18:04 UTC
In reply to:

SETI: Can you hear me, Pentax?! Give me new 85mm portrait lens!

OMG! Not free?! Hope it will have be equal price with Canikon primes.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 18:03 UTC
On article Sony a7R III sample gallery (261 comments in total)

Sony is great for evening or night shoot. Amazing warm tones, beautiful orange faces =) Yep, even when daytime!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 15:11 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies

Can you hear me, Pentax?! Give me new 85mm portrait lens!

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 22:34 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies
Total: 289, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »