Lives in Hong Kong Hong Kong
Joined on Mar 31, 2004


Total: 69, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Updated: our Canon EOS M hands-on preview (161 comments in total)

I would just emphasize on IQ and high ISO performance for the time being. If both are good, then the EOS-M is good to go.

ps. I'm a Nikon DSLR user, what a pity!

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 10:45 UTC as 27th comment
In reply to:

Jun2: These lenses look like SONY

Ugly. In terms of finishing, Pan's 14-42 X is the best looking kit lens.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 06:32 UTC
In reply to:

gl2k: Yoo funny.

How come that Nikon and Canon make the very worst mirrorless cams ?
Are they soooo afraid of loosing DSLR market share ?

As a D700 owner, I'm quite disappointed with the Nikon 1 What a DC sensor! Now it comes the Canon mirrorless with aps-c sensor. We've no idea how good (or bad) it would perform, but at least sensor size does matter!

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 06:05 UTC

Might be it's an almost 'must buy' for Canon DSLR fans with a bunch of glasses.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 04:13 UTC as 413th comment

Amazing 25-600 with constant F2.8. Anyway, I'm using the FZ-35 :)

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 14:49 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

Richt2000: G5? This reads like a G3.1 or G3n.

So far I see no progress from Panasonic or Canon of late.
Nikon, Olympus, Sony and Fuji meanwhile are releasing genuine new models...

Recently when I was checking the G3 then a Pana staff told me the new model is coming, just wait. I would agree that the G5 is just a minor upgrade of the G3 but that's good enough. What is even better, the G3's kit lens is the old 14-42 while this new model has the option to get the 14-42 X.

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 08:05 UTC

Regarding GX1 and G5, in terms of IQ (only), which one is better ?

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 05:18 UTC as 24th comment
In reply to:

RoccoGalatioto: Nikon should be ashamed of themselves for even considering a plastic mount.

Plastic mount ... no way !

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2012 at 08:59 UTC
In reply to:

Michael S.: Smelling the D600 with 24MP on full frame sensor coming up for $ 1500-1990!


... may be it reaches $2200

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 15:30 UTC
In reply to:

JakeB: I really can't stand variable maximum aperture zooms.

You never quite know where you are in the heat of a shoot when you put the aperture on maximum and zoom -- moving from 3.5 to 4.5 can critically alter the shutter speed to one too slow for handheld, even with VR, or one that can't freeze motion.

I'd prefer a straight f4 lens.

Luckily I own Nikon's superb 24-70 f2.8 so all this is moot for me.

That's why I use the 16-35 F4.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 15:28 UTC
In reply to:

3systermuser: well, the 24-120f4VR was a bad lens , it was not as sharp as I expected it to be and it was huge , it was not very well built.
so, I just sold it after using it for a few weeks in 2010.

the 24-70 is a good lens but it is also heavy and bulky , and more importantly it lacks the VR2 , so I still have it but seldom use it now.
I think this AFS24-85VR is a good lens for 580USD and it is so light and small , also this really confimed that the rumored the D600 is for real.
any way, when we need really good lenses for landscape ,studio and as such , we still need a set of Zeiss or expensive f1.4G Nikkors, so I think this is a compromised optics but it can be a great walk around light lens for the D800E.

The 24-70 is crazy heavy and bulky. Absolutely not my cup of tea.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:56 UTC
In reply to:

rondhamalam: what?
don't we have 24-120mm already?

The 24-120 is no good (rather low price performance ratio)

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:55 UTC

I love it! This will be my D700 kit lens!

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 05:27 UTC as 96th comment

Nikon should release one, but just to make sure they're releasing the FX version.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 21st comment
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review (672 comments in total)

Well that's simple. N fanboys could upgrade to D800 while C fanboys may consider 5DMark3, problem solved, case closed.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2012 at 05:08 UTC as 198th comment
In reply to:

Boris F: GH3 is coming closer!
Is it prelude for it?

i think so

Link | Posted on May 21, 2012 at 09:31 UTC

The spec and body build are good. But if the rumoured price (€1100) is true, it's way overpriced for a M4/3 lens.

Anyway, I expect the focus ring is merely for manual focus override and it will not rotate during AF.

Last but not least, there is no distance scale, pity.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2012 at 09:11 UTC as 28th comment
On article Leica unveils X2 16MP premium large-sensor compact (207 comments in total)

Is it true to say, only V-LUX and D-LUX series are made by Panasonic, all other models are made by Leica in Germany?

Link | Posted on May 13, 2012 at 14:45 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Just Posted: In-depth Nikon D800 review (541 comments in total)
In reply to:

teekemann2008: Been using the D800 for some time now, in various conditions. As a fulltime Pro Nikon Shooter and teacher in digital techniques for some 15 years on pro-level, I would like to comment on some of the posts seen here. First, kudos for dpreview, for their unbiased support on reviewing camera's in a very consistent way. About the D800, it's true that this megapixel-beast needs premium glass to perform at it's best. But when a topnotch lens is attached, the output is stunning, even at high ISO. I've made some prints in color as in black/white, which were shot using a Zeiss Planar 85 f:1.4 at f11 to f16 , and I guarantee that this is very, very close to medium format. Sensors don't produce 3D looks in an image, the lens does indeed. Try using a 135 f2.0 DC and you can start drooling allover the screen..LOL. And please, if you're a tripod-landscape shooter: 100 ISO will do the trick, no high ISO's here. This is what the camera was built for. Sports ? Go D4 !

How about the performance of 16-35 VR on D800?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 13:25 UTC
On article Just Posted: In-depth Nikon D800 review (541 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dr GP: I congratulate product development folks at Nikon .
However, management and manufacturing chieftains should see their bonuses reduced: the products are essentially unavailable, except for a few famous photogs who are a subset of nps. The result lost sales, and lost opportunity of new lense sales.

Nikon why can't you introduce a new product and actually make it available? This notion of unprecedented demand is ridiculous. I don't even know anybody , anybody, who got a d800 or a d4. Buuuhya.

... beta testers, right !

Link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 13:20 UTC
Total: 69, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »