SpinOne

Nope.

Ugh, not this again M43 bodies have had a range of sizes, right from the start. E.g. the GH2 dates back to 2010, and weighs 200g more than the GH5. The light gear hasn't gone away, and are still ...

Yeah, I used that combo for a concert last month. It worked pretty well for me, especially as I chose to use bursts to capture moments. Not my favorite genre these days, though. Balancing the color ...

Is that still the case when stopped down? I'd think they'd be around the same at f/8 or so.

Yeah, not so much You shouldn't see shutter shock at speeds faster than 1/250s. It hits around 1/60 to 1/250. If you're seeing something wrong at 1/320 and faster, then something else is going on.

Lots of other people are looking for it, too. Just FYI. Maybe because... it isn't affecting the vast majority of lenses. No one ever said it was flawless. Rather, they dampened it to reduce SS, ...

There is almost no difference between those two cameras. 16mp - 20mp are nearly identical in terms of performance.

Nope. There is almost no difference in terms of image quality between 16mp and 20mp. If you really need high-res multi-shot, you can pick up an E-M5 Mk ii, or a Pen-F, for half the price of the ...

Does it matter? Are you planning to use the images for some commercial purpose? Are you planning to hire a lawyer to clarify the situation, and/or squeeze a few more bucks out of your former employer?

And again, I think the issue isn't with the camera body, it's with the lens. The E-M1 ii is an expensive camera that is heavily scrutinized by lots of people, ranging from professionals to ...

*shrug* OK then. A lens that you know is prone to shutter shock, experiences shutter shock, in certain conditions. Given that the shutter on the E-M1 ii is dampened specifically to reduce SS, it ...

I'm not sure, that may depend on the nature of the image. The image I used had lots of detail, and did not look great at a distance, so my guess is it will often have an impact. I've done 20" x 30" ...

So, I did a quick test this morning. I rented an A7R ii last year, with a 35mm lens, and shot it side-by-side with my E-M1 and 17mm lens. I selected two similar images, resized them to 30" x 40" at ...

I don't see a difference between any of the shutters. Certainly nothing that will be visible with typical output. That tiny bit of blurring doesn't look like shutter shock anyway. SS is much more ...

I spent a week hiking the Sierras recently, and am heading to the Olympics soon. While I don't cut off the handle of my toothbrush, I definitely want to cut down weight and bulk as much as ...

That part, I figured out :-D Just haven't tried it yet. I don't recall seeing any similar resampling options in LR.

Very interesting... I'll have to test this in PS. I've only tried making large prints (20" x 30") without resampling, i.e. seeing the difference between 200ppi and ~150ppi. It looks OK at normal ...

First, nice job ;-) Anyway. Based on this view? Obviously not. I'd also assume that the printer used some type of software to upscale the images. I assume it won't add detail, but will obfuscate ...

It's true for pretty much every format. M43 is different in a few respects: • It uses EVFs, which are not as mature as mirror OVF • It relies heavily on CDAF, which has some issues focusing in low ...

In 2013, Panasonic said they were working on a sensor with very high dynamic range. Of course, that's a far cry from such sensors actually being produced, let alone being used in digital cameras. N ...