Sergey Borachev

It's not about getting 2019 technology at 2016 prices. It's about getting money's worth. Due the smaller M43 sensor, spending $2000 on a M43 body is not worth it because the image quality will be ...

The E-M1 II is not what I and others want for a compact camera with high quality. This has been made clear countless times. It costs too much, is too big and heavy, but has too little IQ ...

No. Then I will stop M43 purchases (but continue to use what I have) and save my money so I can  add another system, Fuji or Sony for my higher needs. There's little point getting a M43 update ...

I agree, pro & small.

Not sure if someone already mentioned this, but I will. M43 still does not have a really high performance but compact lens in that most popular and important FL - 17mm, the classic street lens. All ...

Size alone means nothing. You can find cameras in any size you want. What I want to see is a compact camera with good ergonomics and top sensor quality and performance. Like a E-M5 III with the ...

Ok, I did not explain properly. I meant you can't use those Canon etc lenses on M43 camera the same way, due to the crop factor. That's an inconvenient complication. At least there an option, if ...

Only for 8mm to 14mm and only if they are very high quality and sharp from max. There are many average quality lenses that Olympus should re-do to get better quality and/or add WR, e.g. 12mm, 17mm ...

With a price higher than A7III, this rumoured super duper Olympus M43 model will be the laughing stock in the industry. Let's assume it can somehow match the FF A7III in most ways (DR, ISO, AF ...

It seems it will be many months still, after these 8 months, before we will have any new models. This is the last chance for Olympus to make a difference, and to keep many unhappy users of its mid ...

Decisions are often made by executives that may not be to the best interest of the company, employees or their customers, through stupidity, personal greed, corruption or scandels.

Do you have those numbers? If not, then you can't say I.am wrong. And I believe the E-M5 sold many times better than the E-M1, same for the E-M5 II compared to the E-M1 II. Commonsense says the ...

The Sony FF cameras have shown that it is not only possible, but that the specs can be much much higher. E-M5 II and A7 III http://j.mp/2S1RwbK

Is that basis reliable?

There are people from China and also countless tourists from US who wear big cameras with a red ring lens, BUT, they don't just want a big camera, they also.want to show a particular label and ...

Thanks for all the replies and comments. I would like to point out that we have now gone past the stage of a fight of doomsayers vs fanboys. It should be quite clear that Olympus has a problem, and ...

That's correct except i'm also saying that not everybody wants to pay extra$ for the action shooting features, or forHiRes or even 4K. I would rather have a more advanced sensor with improved ...

I would rather get a new BSI sensor with better IQ and hundreds of AF points in a smaller body than the E-M1 II, even it is discounted to the E-M5 level.

Yes, if it is given proper support and development. Since the E-M1 was released, the E-M5 was neglected. Even the E-M10 got more support and attention.  This is why so many users are still using ...

I don't know if the E-M1 is a success.  I do know that the original E-M5 was a big success, but Olympus decided to put it under the E-M1.