Sergey Borachev

A long-term review comparing these 3 cameras here: https://youtu.be/bROfk7UOup8

I'm visiting HK soon. Where is this dedicated Olympus store in Monkok please?

That's right, since iphones no longer has the best cameras, cameras are not important any more. How about features like SD card and earphone input?

Pro:
"First non-pro Canon to support 4K capture"

LOL. What kind of of pro is this?

🤣🤣

Here we go again. Physics and logic do not matter, if one just claim that real-life differences are neglegible. Nice to have "real life" on your side in an argument. 😆 On such real life situation ...

If you are talking about AF in video, when you said "jumping around", i think Sony is definitely looking better than Fuji, and based on other video AF tests, the Fuji seems to be better than GH5. ...

You have researched well. I believe it's best to wait for more reliable reviews is of A7III before any decision. Also have a play with one, if possible. One thing that has not been mentioned here ...

You have a valid point about the aspect ratio. For some type of photos, especially landscape, a lot of pixels have to be cropped for a better composition. I believe that the 4:3 ratio was chosen ...

The Fuji X-A5 is even more cute, lighter, cheaper but has a new 24 MP sensor.

Just check the Fuji X-A5 specs, 24MP, mike input, higher ISO ... ... Why would anyone (unless they are already in M43), spend more money to buy the E-PL9 with its 6 year old sensor performance?

What a joke!!! Drop the price to $499 with the kit lens. Then it will be considered. With nothing exciting in this camera, people will just pick the Fuji X-A5 instead. 24MP, 15-45mm OIS lens,...

Surprisingly, Fuji is better in video IS even though it's their first generation IBIS! I wonder how the G9 compares. 🤔 And where is DPR's review of the A7III ??  This seems similar to their E-M5 ...

Bree test video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xm0g2B0JXt0 xi

Yeah. Freedom of choice. There's a dark hideous fact about this camera industry. It's not even a secret, just not discussed enough.  Camera makers are using proprietary mounts to restrict freedom ...

Short answer- No. Annoying isn't it, that not even one of the higher end M43 models has a tilt-only screen. Especially for Olympus, a company that is supposed to be more for stills than video, it's ...

Ευχαριστώ

E-M5 III what? It'll be an interesting year for sure, esp by year end.

I'm in awe. 😲🙇

It's for me. 😐 So, light is like a GM1?  But that's nothing compared to what I once had, a really light, portable as well as tiny FF, the Minox GT.

Since it's for stills and weddings, losing GH5's IBIS seems to offset the advantage of the better lowlight performance for shooting more static scenes, posed shots etc. I find it hard to justify ...