wjansen

Lives in United States LaConner, United States
Joined on Mar 7, 2008

Comments

Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 First Impressions (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

Beckler8: I've seen some other youtube 6500 video and unfortunately the 4k rolling shutter is still really bad. :( Clearly the camera isn't ready for 4k, with that and overheating. I think it's a bit ridiculous to have to start planning your shots and worrying which ones might have rolling shutter. I wonder if Fuji XT1 is better; otherwise I guess it's time to wait for GH5.

In fact even look at the second video posted above - with the red gate. No fast action or anything but it looks like a jello-y smartphone video. :D Ridiculous...

Which camera in this class has a global shutter? They ALL have rolling shutter.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 16:58 UTC

I've tried it, and I had to try it a few times before I got something satisfactory. I find that I always have to 'adjust corners' afterwards, or I don't get the full image. It's difficult hand holding phone and shooting the extra areas in an even manner. More documentation would be helpful explaining the best way to achieve optimal results.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2016 at 17:16 UTC as 5th comment

Two questions. Does this model forgo the AA filter? And will it let the user enter focal length info for lenses/adapters without a chip?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 19:24 UTC as 136th comment | 2 replies

AA filter?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 15:55 UTC as 250th comment

So it won't work on the SE?

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 19:21 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply
On article DxO OpticsPro 11 brings advanced Raw noise reduction (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

wjansen: I have version 10 and wonder must I pay to upgrade to 11?

I checked and it will cost $69 to upgrade. I tried loading the trial version, but for some reason my computer says it can't be loaded and that I should check with the vendor to see if a different version is needed. My DxO Optics Pro 10 Elite works just fine.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2016 at 01:51 UTC
On article DxO OpticsPro 11 brings advanced Raw noise reduction (110 comments in total)

I have version 10 and wonder must I pay to upgrade to 11?

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2016 at 23:30 UTC as 11th comment | 5 replies
On article Have your say: Best Lens of 2014 (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

Smokymtnhiker: Not a single Sony lens on the list? Seriously? Wtf?

That's laughable...

I would vote for the Sony 16-50 2.8 kit lens (A mount). It is arguably the best 'kit' lens ever, and when paired with the A77M2, it's a beautiful combination.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 01:32 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 77 II firmware update improves AF speed (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

Serious Sam: Now can we have our 7D2 VS A77ii performance test??

As a Canon fanboy, you probably haven't even tried the Sony products. As been stated earlier, the lagtime is really a non issue. What is ancient technology is having a mirror slapping back and forth! Maybe you should read up where people have used both cameras before making blanket statements?

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 21:57 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

Sure they are USED to the Canons! Sometimes in history things change. In the 1950s Nikon pushed Leica out of the pro hands. I think the days of the OVF are numbered, as well as the insane concept of having a moving mirror slam up and down. I suppose when Canon and Nikon finally upgrade their systems, their users will agree it's a great step forward.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2014 at 20:21 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

In the real world EVF is superior to OVF. Perhaps if the ONLY criteria you have is a sports and nothing else, the 7D2 could possibly have some minor advantages--certainly however no where near your claim of 'no match'. With any camera you can find an area where it excels. For me all of the features play a role. You say there are 'claims' about the 7D's weather sealing--that's nice. Keep in mind the A77ii and its 'kit' 16-50 2.8 is also weather sealed. Do you own the 7D2 and the A77ii so that you can make objective observations? Are you a 'pro' (and what does that mean)? By the way, I liked the original 7D and never considered it as only a 'sports' camera. My argument is that the new Canon is no way in a different league that the A77ii--except price!

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2014 at 19:01 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

I haven't tried the 7D2 and therefore haven't made claims about whether it's a 'professional' or 'amateur' camera. Such statements are provocative. I would say there are many 'sports' photographers using Canon for many reasons; but they're using Canon's big guns, not the 7D series. That is NOT to say the A77ii isn't capable (look at examples in the Sony forum); it's the new kid on the block, so people who have a huge investment in Canon (or Nikon) probable won't switch. I'm saying that in many areas the A77ii is a great camera that can hold its own as a 'pro' or enthusiast camera with the best Canon or Nikon can offer.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

If you bother to read the Sony forum, you might discover that there's a great deal of difference in AF ability. EVF delay is something that is generally negligible. The many advantages of EVF make your OVF system seem very ancient. If you want to judge, perhaps you should be comparing the original 7D as well. I also find it disturbing that Canon is using the outdated sensor. I'm sure the 7D2 is certainly a very good camera--but not in the least more 'professional' than the A77ii.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2014 at 05:18 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

No match in what way? 12 fps with autofocus--wait the 7D can't do that! Price--guess you've got me there; the 7D is twice the cost! Advanced sensor--how old is the one on the 7D? Shall we continue? Sure Canon fanboys should be proud that Canon finally upgraded the 7D, but to say the A77ii is no match is a bit ludicrous!

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2014 at 04:09 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

Canon has a good lens choice, but can anyone afford ALL of them?
Sony has the lenses that most people can use, and there are many Sigma, Tamron and other manufactures that have the A mount.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2014 at 22:39 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: Alright! Time to make a new comparison between the Nikon 80-400, Sony 70-400 and the new 100-400. Previously, the Canon was no match for the new lenses, but this promises a lot! I'm not a Canon shooter, but I can tell this is a good thing for all brands shooters (Prices will definitely go lower)

Funny how Canon and Nikon folks tend to pooh pooh Sony! Tell me what the new 7d11 can do that the A77ii can't (and at 1/2 the price).

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 16:29 UTC
On article Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology (314 comments in total)

Alas, great looking and functional retro Nikon, but....still no eyepiece blind!

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 05:58 UTC as 115th comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Hands-on Nikon D600 preview (376 comments in total)

Seems to be lacking an eyepiece shutter--too bad.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 14:29 UTC as 59th comment | 5 replies

OK, here's my usual question. How is the MLU function implemented in these new Nikons? Hopefully the sequencing is improved over past designs where camera shake could sometimes be problematic.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:00 UTC as 21st comment
On article Fujifilm releases X-S1 premium EXR 26X superzoom (383 comments in total)

The older Fuji big sensor superzoom gave very impressive results. As an avid bird photographer, I'm very much looking forward to this camera. Would love to see some real world samples as I have seen on previous 2/3 semspr fujis. I'm getting too old to lug around a DSLR with a 600 f/4--just not going to happen. Thsi camera may open up new possiblilties for us old bird geeks!

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2011 at 17:22 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply
Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20