gavin

Lives in United States San Diego, United States
Works as a Sales manager
Has a website at www.flickr.com/photos/gavinz
Joined on Jul 10, 2001
About me:

Travel and sports photography.

Comments

Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Nice, but not for me ;-) You cannot compare DSLR lens with Cine specific lenses.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 14:55 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Canon will add C-Log to the EOS 5D Mark IV for $99 (464 comments in total)

Interesting but not for me. I am surprise it needs HW change.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 22:17 UTC as 48th comment
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1905 comments in total)

Very cool. Glad to see Sony step up. I wonder how good the AF is otherwise it looks pretty amazing. Still not going to change brand. Its too much work ;-)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 16:05 UTC as 348th comment
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (305 comments in total)
In reply to:

gavin: Interesting but expensive. I thought my RX100 III was expensive for a small camera...

I think the iPhone 7 is the first with multiple lenses of different focal lengths. OK its only 2. My point is that it is probably not worth $1000+. Anyways it will be something different and interesting.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 00:56 UTC
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (305 comments in total)

Interesting but expensive. I thought my RX100 III was expensive for a small camera...

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2017 at 21:19 UTC as 26th comment | 6 replies

Pretty good start. Much easier than other ways

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2016 at 22:24 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm F10 (122 comments in total)

I still have it in my drawer. It was a great P&S.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 15:32 UTC as 66th comment
On article Hands-on with the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V (234 comments in total)

Great news on the underwater housing!! I had one for my old P&S and now there is a reasonable priced Sony one!

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 04:58 UTC as 58th comment
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2138 comments in total)

Thanks for the quick review. I am very surprised by your speed. Looks like I will be getting one.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 21:38 UTC as 179th comment
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2138 comments in total)

Amazon quote 31 Oct availability. Ordering now

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 16:26 UTC as 385th comment | 1 reply

I hope it works well, but I will take a wait and see. Good PQ is quite subjective and depends on the expectations e.g. I use DSLR but not digital MF.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 18:42 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

bernardly: Still no reviews from DxoMark for the Canon 1DX mk2 and the 80D. Come on, DxoMark!!

Interesting info but not critical?

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 17:50 UTC
On photo 20150806_Alaska_0035 in David M. Anglin's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Good catch

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2016 at 22:22 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 20150806_Alaska_2193 in David M. Anglin's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Nice one

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2016 at 22:21 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: It had to be F4 constantly to deserve "Leica" name on it! Seriously, too expensive for an ordinary tele...

I wished to own one... But I can't.

True. I like the mkII. Its much better than the mk I.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 05:05 UTC
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: It had to be F4 constantly to deserve "Leica" name on it! Seriously, too expensive for an ordinary tele...

I wished to own one... But I can't.

Much cheaper than the canon 100-400

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 23:49 UTC
In reply to:

Sangster: A 1" sensor Nikon J5 ILC that is 16.8 mm thicker with a slower kit lens but retails for $200 less than Canon G7X II?

I think the key to this class of camera is that it must be pocketable. The Js/Vs are not pocketable with a zoom. I hope the GX7II gets better review. The mkI did not do well operationally. I bought the RX100 III instead.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 21:43 UTC

I need one. Not because its cool but my daughter lost my lowly mk I...

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 20:28 UTC as 72nd comment
In reply to:

lacikuss: The only problem is the small sensor...

I'd buy this with a 1" sensor and same size. You Sony figure it out

Not possible in the near future so for all practical purpose not possible since these forums only focus on this years cameras

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 21:56 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review (862 comments in total)
In reply to:

thenewgap: I have a Canon 5D 1st serie, a great camera even if i don’t like big and heavy cams: they have great performances but for some situations it’s more useful a very small camera with a honest image quality. So I bought a Fujifilm X100S that was too big anyway although it had a great global quality. So I sold it and looking for a small camera with sensor of one inch at least, I read enthusiast reviews of Sony RX100.M3 that I bought. And it has a great body: small, light, handy, well positioned buttons, very ergonomic and so on. But, using it intensively, I found that there was no comparison between it’s image quality and Fuji’s. The image of Sony at 800ASA has a noise that Fuji doesn’t show at 1600ASA; and the sharpness of X100, at each aperture or all ASA value, is quite greater than RX100.M3. And these qualities can be seen by a child too… So I asked myself about the reliability of some reviews: which kind of instruments di they use and which procedures do they follow??? Regards

I sort of disagree since i am fine with using the RX100 when I don't want to carry bulk/DSLR. Its a better camera since you have it with you. Of course size/weight are very personal decisions on what is small enough etc.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 00:01 UTC
Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »