gavin

Lives in United States San Diego, United States
Works as a Sales manager
Has a website at www.flickr.com/photos/gavinz
Joined on Jul 10, 2001
About me:

Travel and sports photography.

Comments

Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

They raised $1M crowd funding so go figure. Still looks like a stupid idea to me but hey everyone has different likes and dislikes.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2017 at 17:12 UTC as 185th comment | 1 reply

This is the stupidest idea I have seen in a while. May be good as a novelty or joke thing?

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2017 at 16:25 UTC as 234th comment | 6 replies

Very nice. Good option for many. I recommended the older model for my sister and she loves it.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2017 at 14:49 UTC as 230th comment

Nice, but not for me ;-) You cannot compare DSLR lens with Cine specific lenses.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 14:55 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Canon will add C-Log to the EOS 5D Mark IV for $99 (464 comments in total)

Interesting but not for me. I am surprise it needs HW change.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 22:17 UTC as 48th comment
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)

Very cool. Glad to see Sony step up. I wonder how good the AF is otherwise it looks pretty amazing. Still not going to change brand. Its too much work ;-)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 16:05 UTC as 348th comment
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (305 comments in total)
In reply to:

gavin: Interesting but expensive. I thought my RX100 III was expensive for a small camera...

I think the iPhone 7 is the first with multiple lenses of different focal lengths. OK its only 2. My point is that it is probably not worth $1000+. Anyways it will be something different and interesting.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 00:56 UTC
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (305 comments in total)

Interesting but expensive. I thought my RX100 III was expensive for a small camera...

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2017 at 21:19 UTC as 26th comment | 6 replies

Pretty good start. Much easier than other ways

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2016 at 22:24 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm F10 (122 comments in total)

I still have it in my drawer. It was a great P&S.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 15:32 UTC as 66th comment
On article Hands-on with the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V (234 comments in total)

Great news on the underwater housing!! I had one for my old P&S and now there is a reasonable priced Sony one!

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 04:58 UTC as 58th comment
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2156 comments in total)

Thanks for the quick review. I am very surprised by your speed. Looks like I will be getting one.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 21:38 UTC as 184th comment
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2156 comments in total)

Amazon quote 31 Oct availability. Ordering now

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 16:26 UTC as 390th comment | 1 reply

I hope it works well, but I will take a wait and see. Good PQ is quite subjective and depends on the expectations e.g. I use DSLR but not digital MF.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 18:42 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

bernardly: Still no reviews from DxoMark for the Canon 1DX mk2 and the 80D. Come on, DxoMark!!

Interesting info but not critical?

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 17:50 UTC
On photo 20150806_Alaska_0035 in David M. Anglin's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Good catch

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2016 at 22:22 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 20150806_Alaska_2193 in David M. Anglin's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Nice one

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2016 at 22:21 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: It had to be F4 constantly to deserve "Leica" name on it! Seriously, too expensive for an ordinary tele...

I wished to own one... But I can't.

True. I like the mkII. Its much better than the mk I.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 05:05 UTC
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: It had to be F4 constantly to deserve "Leica" name on it! Seriously, too expensive for an ordinary tele...

I wished to own one... But I can't.

Much cheaper than the canon 100-400

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 23:49 UTC
In reply to:

Sangster: A 1" sensor Nikon J5 ILC that is 16.8 mm thicker with a slower kit lens but retails for $200 less than Canon G7X II?

I think the key to this class of camera is that it must be pocketable. The Js/Vs are not pocketable with a zoom. I hope the GX7II gets better review. The mkI did not do well operationally. I bought the RX100 III instead.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 21:43 UTC
Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »