iudex

iudex

Lives in Slovak Republic Slovak Republic
Joined on Dec 16, 2011

Comments

Total: 869, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Nice. That´s exactly what M 4/3 system needs: fast lenses that take advantage of smaller sensor, thus enabling relatively smaller lenses (compare to Nikkor 24mm/1,4 with 620g and 77mm filter thread).
However given the Leica badge it will cost a fortune, so I do not expect big sales. It´s a pitty Oly or Pany do not make such fast lenses (f1,2-1,4) on their own (i.e. cheaper than Leica).

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 07:37 UTC as 120th comment | 16 replies
In reply to:

Marty4650: Sounds like an amazing camera at a very good price.

Kudos to Pentax, who keeps producing great products. It really is baffling that they don't get larger market share.

@Foosa: and now imagine there is no "brick and morar store" that sells Pentax in my whole country. But I never regretted buying Pentax cameras online, the handling and ergonomics is better than entry level competition, so you cannot go wrong. Anyhow it wuld be great to have the chance to try all cameras in one store, comparing them directly. I believe much more people would be shooting Pentax now.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2016 at 06:54 UTC
On article Fast telezoom: Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 sample images (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

goactive: The photos look ok the canon images are very noisy at such a low iso.
The sharpness seems to be no better then other lens and not as good as others.
At 1.8 it dose not seem to even come close a Nikon 50 1.8 for sharpness at 1.8 on up to 2.8... The weight of the lens makes it a monster to walk around with. The out of focus area at 1.8 and F2 do not seem to be as nice as other prime lens just ok.
The zoom range of 50-100 i still do not get it is not good for any real group portraits on a cropped camera starting at 50 and is not as much zoom as say a 135 prime or using a 70-200 at the 200 end.

I would love to see a version of this in the 35-70 range so that would let you shoot most all portrait ranges you need the most. so that would be a FF version of a 52.5 to 105 covering the FF portrait range of 50mm, 70mm, 85mm and 105mm in one lens the most used ranges for a portrait session.

I suggest visiting an optician. ;-)
The lens is amazingly sharp. And other reviews confirm this:
Lenstip wrote: "It’s really difficult to find the right words in order to describe the results. The new Sigma is absurdly sharp. At the beginning of this chapter we wrote that the best lenses, tested on the 50D, are able to reach near 55 lpmm. In the shorter range of focal lengths the Sigma is able to go as high as them…being wide open! It is an incredible achievement, especially if you take into account the fact that you deal here with a zoom lens! What’s more, by f/2.8 and across the whole focal range the lens gets record-breaking results amounting to 59 lpmm. So far we haven’t tested a more outstanding device designed to work with APS-C/DX sensors…"

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 20:41 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

@nicolaie: "after you buy it you realize why they cost so little"
Seriously, why?
The only reason why any Pentaxian has got rid of Pentax camera by now was the lack of FF and no upgrade possibility. Now even this argument has gone, since there is the fantastic K-1, equalling the famous Nikon D810.
I arady have a third Pentax camera and I see no reason to switch to C or N. And if I feel somewhere in the fuure my APSC camera limits me (in fact the opposite is true), I will go fullframe within Pentax brand.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 12:35 UTC
On article 2016 Roundup: $1200-2000 ILCs part 1 - Crop-Sensor (180 comments in total)
In reply to:

deff: Well I'm quite happy with GX8 + Leica DG Summilux 25mm f/1.4 ASPH ... the image quality is outstanding, no overheating, best evf I've ever seen, great ergo, connectivity and really lightweight in compare with this huge semi pro mirror cams. And its only 1150 euro, with lens.. My old D7100 sits at home now.

Well if you don´t miss the clearly better image quality of D7100 (one of the best APSC sensors so far), then good for you. ;-)

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 12:48 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: Sounds like an amazing camera at a very good price.

Kudos to Pentax, who keeps producing great products. It really is baffling that they don't get larger market share.

Nobby: I think Pentx is already pretty well positioned in MF market, the 645Z sells very well. But MF cameras take only a negligible fraction of total DSLR sales and if the brand wants to be seen, it needs to sell volumes. And cheaper cameras make bigger volumes. And when someone buys entry level camera, he usually stays with the system when he upgrades. That´s why cheap entry level DSLRs are inevitable.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 12:43 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

Nobby: according to your logic no DSLR manufacturr should produce entry level cameras, since everyone already has one and if he buys anoter one, it will be a higher model. This is simply not true and therefore every DSL producer makes entry level models. Te only difference is that Pentax makes a perfectly specced one while Canon and Nikon make stripped versions.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 12:38 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: I believe there was no need to make this lens retractable. The original 55-300mm is pretty small for this zoom range and even a bit lighter than this new version.
As regards the new features I understand the benefit of these improvemens for video shooters, but for stills there is no real benefit, whereas the slower speed might be an issue (the original version is no speed demon and this one is even worse). Plus, the original version can be had for much less money (I remember some 260 SD price tag at B&H).
Anyhow, a new lens is always welcome, although I think there are APSC lenses that Pentax needs more (fast wideangle lenses, new 17-70, 16-50 and 50-135mm etc.).

Maybe it was lost in translation, with speed I meant luminosity, the lens with f5,8 at the tele end is quite slow and f6,4 is even worse.
AF speed is a different thing, I have no doubts the new lens will focus much faster.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 11:51 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

I don´t think so. People are buying better cameras, dumping their cheap P&S and swithing to DSLR or mirrorless. And a DLSR newcomer is most likely to look at the price and value for money. In this aspect K-70 is unbeatable. I also entered the "serious camera" world this way, comparing what I could get for my money and Pentax clearly won (over other DSLR and mirrorless, that were both more expensive and lower specced).

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 09:16 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

@Nobby2016: no, since I have a higher-positioned Pentax.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 09:03 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

Well it is an entry level Pentax, since the K-50 and K-S2 are now discontinued. And it is Pentax´s advantage that their entry model is on par with mid-range models of C/N.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 09:02 UTC

Great camera and a slap in Canon and Nikon´s face: who else produses such fully packed entry-level model? Just Pentax does. Bravo Pentax!

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 07:11 UTC as 60th comment | 11 replies

I believe there was no need to make this lens retractable. The original 55-300mm is pretty small for this zoom range and even a bit lighter than this new version.
As regards the new features I understand the benefit of these improvemens for video shooters, but for stills there is no real benefit, whereas the slower speed might be an issue (the original version is no speed demon and this one is even worse). Plus, the original version can be had for much less money (I remember some 260 SD price tag at B&H).
Anyhow, a new lens is always welcome, although I think there are APSC lenses that Pentax needs more (fast wideangle lenses, new 17-70, 16-50 and 50-135mm etc.).

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 07:09 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
On article Sweet spot: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 real-world samples (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: JPEG is becoming the new Raw ☺️

In Lazyland maybe. ;-)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 15:10 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: The place on the title photo is somehow familiar to me: http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/7111647878/photos/3454077/sk-gafoss :-)

And so many people haven´t lifted their ass from their home town and haven´t seen that waterfall. ;-)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 15:08 UTC

The place on the title photo is somehow familiar to me: http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/7111647878/photos/3454077/sk-gafoss :-)

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 11:42 UTC as 21st comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EOS 80D Field Test: Barney builds a boat (220 comments in total)

Good job Barney (and dpreview)! I really enjoy these field tests and this one with kayak building was especially interesting. Don´t be put off by the few negative comments here, the majority of us really likes your video tests, keep it up!

Link | Posted on May 25, 2016 at 07:11 UTC as 77th comment
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1093 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: How do people carry these cameras around all day without getting annoyed? Do you have massive arm muscles? Don't you get sore shoulders from holding up heavy cameras/lenses? I can well understand my pro friend's move to APS-C, although I find APS-C even too heavy for me.

@Weertebros: you photo shows exactly what I said, that camera body is the smallest part of the equipment, lenses and tripod are the big heavy part. So switching from DSLR to mirrorless doesn´t help if you want to shoot wildlife. I gave up shooting birds etc. just because I am not willing to carry heavy lenses and make do with small 100mm prime as my longest lens.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 11:48 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1093 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: How do people carry these cameras around all day without getting annoyed? Do you have massive arm muscles? Don't you get sore shoulders from holding up heavy cameras/lenses? I can well understand my pro friend's move to APS-C, although I find APS-C even too heavy for me.

The link requires login.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 10:57 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1093 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: How do people carry these cameras around all day without getting annoyed? Do you have massive arm muscles? Don't you get sore shoulders from holding up heavy cameras/lenses? I can well understand my pro friend's move to APS-C, although I find APS-C even too heavy for me.

In my opinion it´s more about lenses than about the camera body itself. On my last trip to Iceland I carried mostly an allround zoom (16-85mm) in my hand and a tiny wideangle prime (15mm) in my pocket. No problem during the whole day. However if you put a heavy FX f2,8 zoom the combo is really heavy no matter which camera body you have (DX or FX).
Btw. the biggest annoyance is the tripod anyway.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 06:56 UTC
Total: 869, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »