iudex

iudex

Lives in Slovak Republic Slovak Republic
Joined on Dec 16, 2011

Comments

Total: 869, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

iudex: Great! This is the kind of lens I have been dreaming of for my DSLR. Broad range (starting at useful wideangle), constant aperture, reasonably fast and high quality (the Pro lenses already proved their qualities so I have no doubt this one will be good too). If I was a M4/3 shooter this would be definitely my must-have lens. All the 14-something lenses are too narrow at wideangle; 12-40/2,8 is fast, but a bit limited in range, 12-60/3,5-5,6 is better in range, but too slow and obviously ment as kit lens. 12-100 looks perfect in all aspects.
I wish there was similar lens for Pentax, something like 16-135/4. The 18-135mm is too narrow at wideangle and 16-85 is a bit too short at tele, but most importantly, they are both slow variable aperture lenses (f3,5-5,6). Bt Richoh is now concentrating it´s limited fnds on fullframe, so DA lens is not real. Sigma maybe?

That was a DSLR lens, for M4/3 users quite unusable. It had nice specs nonetheless and those could work nicely on M4/3. But soon you will have exactly the same lens, since Panasonic announced such lens. Then there will be a great choice of fast (or faster) zoom lenses: 12-40/2,8, 12-60/2,8-4, 12-100/4. Spec-wise the 12-60 looks like the sweet spot (when it reaches the market).

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2016 at 08:11 UTC
In reply to:

KCook: An M4/3 lens requiring a 72mm filter???

justshootme

My f3,5-5,6 APSC lens requires also 72mm filters.
You simply cannot have it all: fast aperture, big range, small dimensions and small filters.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 06:56 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: It's 28-200/f8.0 equivalent for FF...F8.0...Hmmmm...

Ogl: error in your calculation: 12-100mm equals to 24-200mm (2x crop sensor), not 28-200.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 11:47 UTC

Great! This is the kind of lens I have been dreaming of for my DSLR. Broad range (starting at useful wideangle), constant aperture, reasonably fast and high quality (the Pro lenses already proved their qualities so I have no doubt this one will be good too). If I was a M4/3 shooter this would be definitely my must-have lens. All the 14-something lenses are too narrow at wideangle; 12-40/2,8 is fast, but a bit limited in range, 12-60/3,5-5,6 is better in range, but too slow and obviously ment as kit lens. 12-100 looks perfect in all aspects.
I wish there was similar lens for Pentax, something like 16-135/4. The 18-135mm is too narrow at wideangle and 16-85 is a bit too short at tele, but most importantly, they are both slow variable aperture lenses (f3,5-5,6). Bt Richoh is now concentrating it´s limited fnds on fullframe, so DA lens is not real. Sigma maybe?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 06:58 UTC as 13th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

iudex: Maybe it´s too early to judge just by this pictures but it seems to me the camera is pretty big (thick) for a mirrorless. I am sure it will be much smaller than SLR like the Pentax 645Z (not that sure about Leica S), but Hsselblad showed how a mirrorless camera should look like (or how thin it can be) despite having MF sensor.
And the price surprised me too (in a negative way): well under 10000 USD can be 9000 USD. I was hoping for "under 5000 USD", given the Hasse is 9000 USD.

I remember, no only Lunar, but also Stellar. But I dont think these 2 mistakes ruined the whole reputation and premium position on the market. Aston Martin also made a rebranded Toyota mini car (Cygnet) but that didn´t make A-M a mainstream brand.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 14:47 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Sony a99 II (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Consumer: "This is the camera of my dreams!"

Canon & Nikon: "This is the camera of our nightmares!"

.

Consuer: oh, the last dinosaur, kids, look at it before it extincts.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 11:50 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Sony a99 II (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

King of Song: Probably superior to the new Canon 5D mk IV in every way, but might not even have 5% of the marketplace success? Sony is striving for greatness, Canon is half asleep.

Too bad Sony didn't go that one step further and get rid of the redundant mirror, and score that knockout homerun against the 2 sleeping giants.

Kig of Song: it could be better than 5D IV (which I doubt), but it is the same case as Samsung NX1 (remember it?). NX1 was a perfectly specced camera, way ahead of the competition, but only few people bought it and Samsung killed the whole system soon. The same applies to Sony SLT: they may be great cameras, but who will risk investing in the system when there is high probability that A mount will be abandoned? Sony is fighting on too many fronts (SLT APSC an FF, mirrorless APSC and FF, compacts, smartphones...) and given the rapidly groving popularity of mirrorless I believe A-mount (SLT) is already dead and E-mount is the system Sony will concentrate on. And in this situaton even if someone likes the a99, the incertainty of the system puts him off.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 11:49 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: Maybe it´s too early to judge just by this pictures but it seems to me the camera is pretty big (thick) for a mirrorless. I am sure it will be much smaller than SLR like the Pentax 645Z (not that sure about Leica S), but Hsselblad showed how a mirrorless camera should look like (or how thin it can be) despite having MF sensor.
And the price surprised me too (in a negative way): well under 10000 USD can be 9000 USD. I was hoping for "under 5000 USD", given the Hasse is 9000 USD.

Yes I know Hasse price is body only (but the EVF is there). But again, it´s Hasselblad, a premium brand, a different league that justifies the price just by the name. Fuji is mainstream so it should keep prices well under premium brands. "Well under 10000" means it will be "high above 5000", my estimation is 8000-8500 USD. And that´s hell of a lot.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 11:30 UTC

Maybe it´s too early to judge just by this pictures but it seems to me the camera is pretty big (thick) for a mirrorless. I am sure it will be much smaller than SLR like the Pentax 645Z (not that sure about Leica S), but Hsselblad showed how a mirrorless camera should look like (or how thin it can be) despite having MF sensor.
And the price surprised me too (in a negative way): well under 10000 USD can be 9000 USD. I was hoping for "under 5000 USD", given the Hasse is 9000 USD.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 11:11 UTC as 140th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

iudex: I know I am risking critisizm from A-mount fans (all 5 of them :-)), but in my opinion SLT cameras are a compromise combining disadvantages of both SLR (size and weight) and mirrorless (few lenses, EVF). It´s like homo neanderthalensis, a dead end of evolution sentenced to extinct sooner or later.

Cosmin Munteau: you are not counting old legacy lenses, are you? (in this case Pentax would be the king). I am talking about modern digital-era full-frame lenses capable of resolving 42 MPx.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 10:45 UTC
On Article:1730096095 (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

photog4u: Brilliant! Well done Sony! This is definitely a hard blow to the D810...

Well...dream on. I cannot imagine a single pro protographer choosing an possibly-soon-to-extinct SLT system. Not even Sony knows whether the A-mount will live on or they drop it completely in favour of E-mount.

Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:49 UTC

I know I am risking critisizm from A-mount fans (all 5 of them :-)), but in my opinion SLT cameras are a compromise combining disadvantages of both SLR (size and weight) and mirrorless (few lenses, EVF). It´s like homo neanderthalensis, a dead end of evolution sentenced to extinct sooner or later.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:46 UTC as 181st comment | 9 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10/LX15 First Impressions Review (128 comments in total)

Having seen the first rumoured specs I was raptured: it seemed like a perfect compact. I was expecting a LX100 successor with more modern sensor and faster lens. Only after readint this article I realized there is no EVF and this is not the LX100 successor with faster lens, but a LX7 successor with bigger sensor.
For me a camera costing more than cca. 300 eur definitely must have a viewfinder. It may be small, but it needs to be there. Sony understood it after 2 generations of RX100, so hopefully Pana will come with an EVF in the second gen LX10. For now the old LX100 is (in my opinion) a beter choice.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 12:31 UTC as 57th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10/LX15 First Impressions Review (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

Osa25: Since when did 1" CMOS become a "big sensor"? Is this written from advertising point of view or the readers?

Since 1/1,7" was standard for enthusiast compacts.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 12:25 UTC
On article Updated: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV real-world sample gallery (485 comments in total)
In reply to:

osan: Some of the outdoor pictures are taken in mid day/early afternoon, in a grey light with huge DR which is very taxing for any camera. Some of the scenes have also very bright reflected light. It's a typical and horrible end of summer light any landscape shooter would avoid. Taking this in to account, IMHO, MKIV coped very well. I wander if my "suspicions" are correct Carey Rose?

Maybe a landscape shooter would avoid midday sun, but a typical tourist shoots during the day just as the pics here were taken.
I went for a hike two days ago and despite I know that golden hour is the best, I had to shoot during the day with harsh light (since it toook some 3,5 hours to get to the summit, despite getting up very early, I simply didn´t have the benefit of good light and had to shoot in bright light). So seeing how a camera handles harsh light and copes wih great DR is useful to majority of users.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2016 at 08:42 UTC
In reply to:

J A C S: I thought that Canon announced new lenses, not glass?

The table says that the 24-105 is f/2.8?

About the number of blades - I am very curious to see the starbursts of the new 24-105. With an even number of blades, you get fewer but longer spikes. For example, I really like what the 50L does (8 blades) with night shots. But the current 24-105 is not so great for that, same number of blades.

OK, I was wrong, thanks for clarifying that.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 08:56 UTC
In reply to:

J A C S: I thought that Canon announced new lenses, not glass?

The table says that the 24-105 is f/2.8?

About the number of blades - I am very curious to see the starbursts of the new 24-105. With an even number of blades, you get fewer but longer spikes. For example, I really like what the 50L does (8 blades) with night shots. But the current 24-105 is not so great for that, same number of blades.

Just as Rishi said number of blades is not everything. I am a Pentaxian so one example from "own house": when Pentax upgraded its Limited primes from smc to HD coating, the negative side effect was that the starbursts got much worse, despite the number of blades remained unchanged. It was all caused by the new coating, which very effectively removed flare, but had the aforementioned negative efect on starbursts.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 08:04 UTC
In reply to:

ThatCamFan: I as an Icelander would like to ask people NOT to get so close to the sea on that black sand beach. It is THEE most dangerous beach in the world.

Freak waves are common & have taken a lot of people out to sea & caused many deaths.

Sure it looks lovely but it is one of the deadliest beaches of the world & got the strongest tide there is. We see tourists ignore the signs that warn of the danger non stop & had quite a few deaths.

We see news stories about tourists almost being killed EVERY week in the media on that beach.

It´s all about common sense. When I saw some japanese girls trying to climb on an unstable iceberg in Jokulsárlón to make pictures I was speachless, especially as I read about people being drifted away on ice a couple of weeks ago. Iceland is a beautiful country and potographers tend to oversee the danger in order to get the best picture.
Btw. a couple of days ago icelandic writer Jón Kalman Stefánsson came to my country to promote his book and he said he remebered the times when he saw first tourists coming to Iceland and he wondered what they wanted to see there. ;-)

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2016 at 09:20 UTC
In reply to:

ThatCamFan: I as an Icelander would like to ask people NOT to get so close to the sea on that black sand beach. It is THEE most dangerous beach in the world.

Freak waves are common & have taken a lot of people out to sea & caused many deaths.

Sure it looks lovely but it is one of the deadliest beaches of the world & got the strongest tide there is. We see tourists ignore the signs that warn of the danger non stop & had quite a few deaths.

We see news stories about tourists almost being killed EVERY week in the media on that beach.

While I cannot confirm the deadliness of black beach tide, I also got hit by a wave while concentrating on tre right composition. The vawes were ending far from me, so I set the camera on a tripod and suddenly a wave came much closer than I anticipated, so I got splasched by cold water. No big problem, just wet socks and trousers, but since that time I was more cautious.

Link | Posted on Jul 13, 2016 at 07:25 UTC
On article Faster flagship: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T2 (121 comments in total)

Nice upgrade. But wow, 1700 EUR for an APSC camera, that is definitely too much. :-/

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 12:04 UTC as 20th comment
Total: 869, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »