MrQuimper

I agree with you, but my understanding is that the list of affected lenses is very short, and thanks to the custom microlenses array, the SL works well with the majority of M mount lenses.

but the SL is not great with some wide angle M lenses like for example the 21mm SEM, the corners are messed up, so it's not really a solution, unless Leica also updates these problematic lenses.

Unfortunately Leica's external evf is an ugly piece of junk. I had it for a few months then sold it out of desperation. It's slow, takes a while to turn on, refresh rate is even slower, it has a ...

I'm in my early forties and I think there will be one Go have a look on rangefinderforum or leicaforum archives, there's shittonnes of threads about it. Same as above Agree, it was a terrible idea. ...

Just ignore them. The average M user you see gun blazing on forums is over 60 and extremely conservative. These are the same people that, in order, said: - a digital M is blasphemy! - a digital ...

This must be the post where we discover that all photographers, lens engineers and camera market analysts on this forum are also excellent software engineers specialized in SoC, ARM and Intel...

Face and Eye-AF is non-existent. C-AF is at the same level. In general I found the AF inferior to pretty much everything released after 2015 except probably other Panasonic cameras. They do need ...

My old setup. I've sold the SL2 in the meantime. I may eventually swap the Sony for a S5, but for now it's wait and see.

Honestly it depends from lens to lens. I find the Zeiss Distagon 35mm the better lens compared to the Lux, yet it's less than half the price.

Yes, and compared to every other full frame manufacturer they are big and heavy

This is the reason why I'm skeptical about investing into the L mount. I'd love to get a Pana S5 but interoperability with other members of the alliance seems half-assed to say the least. That and ...

You can call the SL lenses whatever you want, but "light" is definitely the one adjective I wouldn't use.

Yes, because price is definitely an indicator of quality, right? LOL!

This may sound surprising to you, but I'd still pick the Voigtlander, simply because of size and weight. One of the reasons why I have a M10 is because it's small and portable. Remove this factor, ...

Well, I'm not a Panasonic engineer, but I'd say yes. As I said, they already have animal recognition + eye recognition (for humans), so the core technology is there in the current firmware. As for ...

Too big, too heavy, too expensive. I'd take the Voigtlander 75mm f1.5 over the 75 Lux any day

Unlikely. They have eye-af for people and already have animal recognition, it's a matter of time and resources. They simply didn't have enough time to add this feature right now and they were ...

Well, on my M10 I have only the Summilux and the rest is only Zeiss and Voigtlanders and I'm super happy. I find their offering to be superior to their Leica counterparts.

I very strongly disagree. The Sony 55 f1.8 is an excellent performer and a light lens at 281g. The Tamron 28-75 is a zoom and it comes at 550g The SL primes are 740g each. That is heavy in my opinion.

These are exactly the reasons why I sold mine. Size, weight of lenses, poor AF performance, in particular with face AF (there's no Eye-AF fyi) I mean, I could live with the bulk of the body, but ...