Paul

I guess my first thought was a new mount but a new design does not mean a new mount, so yes, I am all for a new design, hopefully with manual f stop ring? looks like there are 2 rings, so one ...

not sure any of this makes much sense? a prototype sold online? completely new lens design? not even a hint of an announcement? I want this to be true as much as everybody else but this is not ...

I only have the 45 macro tube and it does work but behavior is a little strange, AF has a hard time if it grabs at all, at the long end it does seem to work ok. never thought of using it with the ...

just wanted to chime in here again, I first bought the 35-70 and ended up returning it because the optical performance was so obviously below the 50 and 32-64. since everybody else keeps singing ...

I don't know what camera they are using, but for a 50mpix file range there is no way to even get full size jpegs transferred via wifi in a second or 2. my wired connection takes longer with high ...

wireless tethering is an awesome concept and afaik camranger has made it possible and stable but there are obvious limitations: transfer time is the big issue when shooting people. even full size ...

yes, I also want a A1 with a 645 size sensor and a full lens line up. under 10K for the body. and a beautiful side effect would be that hasselblad, fuji GFX and Phase would be done overnight. but ...

maybe, could be, but again, I used the 100s AF with all lenses, same scene. so if the 35-70 somehow does not focus the same way the 50 and 32-64 does, I have no use for it. I don't have any issues ...

I am tempted to try it again, and my decision wasn't down to expectations, the difference was very obvious. I had high hopes because I had heard so many good things about the lens. I am however ...

I guess I should check it out again, because the copy I tried was clearly worse then the 50 and the 32-64. at all f stops and across the range. must have been a bad one.

I like that they are showing actual un retouched close ups, there are a lot of variables and all the other samples are usually completely retouched and with full make up. I think these definitely ...

excellent point, the A1 is 6k, this proposed sensor is close to 4 times the size which would make the cost a lot more then 4 times more. a lot. you can get a larger sensor right now, it is a Sony ...

even if Sony actually had a sensor like that, which they don't, at (fuji GFX) scale sales a much smaller and more straight forward (existing 100mpix) bodies are 6 and 10K with probably tiny ...

nothing scientific but I just got the 100s and the 50 was an easy choice for me, light small and probably my favorite focal length  (close to 40mm FF) anyway. also ordered the 32-64 since I usually ...

so with the latest firmware we only get 999 files in a folder, does the camera automatically create a new folder? do the numbers start over? I am not there yet but don't want to fire off 100s of ...

so what are the disadvantages? how can it be a problem?

ok, that is what I thought, unless I come across shutter shock I will stick with manual what is the read out time with EFCS? when might things get funky?

since we are talking about it: is there a disadvantage to always using mechanical shutter?

C1 might have different requirements for power, different cable maybe? but most important, windows?Mac? system? too many variables. for me the plug in works great, I am on M1pro so LRc is running ...

put that family to work! a nice workflow with a runner loading and storing film in a safe location, one loading the camera and one making sure the shutter is ready:) not sure how anyone will get ...