Lives in Finland Finland
Works as a architect, photographer
Joined on May 9, 2004


Total: 61, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Just get a DMC-XS3 for 100 €. Looks as cool and probably has as good image quality too.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 10:31 UTC as 9th comment

I can understand why I would want attach an olloclip telephoto lens, but with all this gear we reach the point where it is more sensible use a dedicated camera with normal equipment.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 13:45 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Apple patent describes dual-camera design (32 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: All brand bashing aside, this seems like a great idea to get a little zoom into camera phones.

I am not much into zooms but decent optics for portraiture would be cool. Wideangles just do not do it.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 12:05 UTC
In reply to:

RadPhoto: So, the "Pro" should pay more (double) to get presets. Shouldn't the "Pro" create his/her own presets?

I thought "Pro" gets plug-ins for LR etc?

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2015 at 12:26 UTC
In reply to:

Sarge_: I just wish there were a way to convert the optical effects to what you would see from a medium or large format sensor, to eliminate the distortion.

As a pro who shoots a lot of architecture, that's my biggest beef with shooting wide on a 35mm body; there's not much value as things get so ridiculously distorted.

Has anyone found any filters or software in general that can overcome the 'wide angle' distortion from these wide lenses?

The geometry in the image still looks the same. (BTW, I have also 47mm Super-Angulon.. have not used it for ages :-D)

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2015 at 08:37 UTC

I do not think that lens is a zoom lens. Just ordinary 2X teleconverter.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 16:34 UTC as 1st comment
On article 5 new must-have photo editing apps (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fixx: 3 is enough. Lightroom, Photomatix, Photoshop.

Architectural photography. HDR is needed for managing the dynamic range.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2013 at 06:02 UTC
On article 5 new must-have photo editing apps (99 comments in total)

3 is enough. Lightroom, Photomatix, Photoshop.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2013 at 12:38 UTC as 34th comment | 3 replies

I still have my Kodak DC50.

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 06:06 UTC as 81st comment

Does this work with RAW-photos or does the processing produce JPEG-files? That is, if I have distortion control enabled in my camera, do I get corrected NEF-files to my Lightroom library?

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2013 at 20:20 UTC as 13th comment | 12 replies
In reply to:

Closely Observed Images: After decades of constantly battling with windows based architecture I bit the bullet and bought a S/H Mac Pro 1.1 that is the most amazingly capable (and stable) computer I have ever owned. I handles LR4 and photoshop apps with ease and speed, but runs Snow Leopard (IOS 10.6.8).

I have used every version of LR since it's inception.

Why no support for LR5 running under Snow Leopard then? I'm an enthusiastic amateur photographer who makes a living driving taxi's and enjoys tinkering with images.

I'm gutted that whilst I would happily pay for an upgrade. Adobe have just lost my custom by making themselves even more exclusive.

Bye . . . . .

Snow Leopard is though very stable and efficient operating system. There are few benefits in upgrading to Mountain Lion.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 11:55 UTC
In reply to:

ScottRH: Why, why why - because it is a consumer body, not pro.

that has been always the case. Fastest shutter speeds were in consumer bodies even in film era, as fast shutters got easier broken.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 09:22 UTC
On article X-Rite i1Profiler v1.4 features scanner profiling (6 comments in total)

Does that replace i1ProfilerD2LionEdition? Which is quite beta and suffers compatibility problems. Or is it only for newer profiler devices?

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 15:51 UTC as 5th comment

Looks like tool for portraiture and maybe product photography. Less a toy for amateurs (who insist on interchangeable lenses).

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 12:22 UTC as 44th comment | 3 replies
On article The Lightroom catalog (299 comments in total)

I find LR to be very useful and efficient tool for photo management and editing. For management part I wish it could write keywords to RAW header. They would be universally searchable that way. Of course within LR it should use its own database for speed reasons.

In export LR seems to write some metadata to images though I am not sure if it includes keywords (it should). I can find title and description (in Finder show info and in Quick Look/SneakPeek Photo) which in my case contain most of the same information. Very useful when you need to access already exported files in Finder. Command-F finds them immediately.

As for folder structures... I use folders which are by shoots and named accordingly. Generally I access latest jobs by folders but anything older I access by keywords. No substitute for that after a few years of photo accumulation.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2013 at 22:33 UTC as 14th comment
Total: 61, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »