LDunn1

Put the system into space on a number of orbiting satellites, and it could replace google earth, and make owning a dslr for landscapes redundant!

"expect the unexpected" it says......

a digital camera would be 'too expected'.

Therefore I'm going with a retro FILM rangefinder - especially as analogue in general (vinyl album records in our...

Thanks, I was under the impression that dual pixel was pretty good for stills in live view too!......so, it is still innovation for video, which has to be in liveview for a DSLR's.

to be fair to Canon re innovation, they have given the world dual pixel, which I've not used, but have read about alot, & it seems like the best option out there for liveview/video focus, even...

I suspect there are alot of us Canon users largely in agreement with the contents of this article. I've been with Canon since 1987 when the Eos system launched, upgraded multiple times within the...

With all those elements, it's probably save to say they won't be using a curved sensor then ;-)

re the amount of time spent stacking in PS. - why not use (its free) DeepSkyStacker? It's pretty quick & automatic. I've moved on from using DSS now, I've stacked with Registar & MaximDL in the ...

I followed the link to Amazon in the article, and noticed this as an alternative, which looks exactly the same for even less at...

@lawny13 - ah, I see, yes, agree with everything there!

The lack of tilt screen on the 5d4, and its price point, were the main issues for me too. I've been increasingly wondering if I could get...

Disagree that Canon don't need it yet!

I think Both Nikon and Sony have arguably equal or superior cameras now, overall. Sure, Canon may have a bit of a lead in some areas still, but they are not...

Maybe with that new back illuminated sensor, the low light/hi ISO/shadow recovery is SO good that they have made a pop up flash virtually pointless!

Looks like my 'ideal', perfect camera! I'm just reading the write ups to find out what's 'wrong' with it, and I think I've spotted it!........it's the mount, I'm a Canon owner/user, too many Canon...

I've just posted my results and made the same comment about display device calibration after reading a few readers comments below mine (with different outcomes) then seeing one set similar to mine...

Nikon 35 (11x3 + 1x2)
Sony 23 (1x3 + 9x2 + 2x1)
Canon 14 (2x2 + 10x1)

My fave in each set was pretty clear in most sets.

The remain two pictures in each set were closer/harder for me to...

ahhhh - I didn't spot that it was "Pro DSLR" & not "Pro camera" !

Maybe EISA need to consider redefining the name of the award now non DSLR pro level cameras are coming on the scene, or add a new...

@Segaman I am curious, what are you taking as the start of photography when you say it has existed since the 18th Century? Can you be a little more specific please.

Putting the start point of...

I bet Sony were disappointed that the A9 didn't win Pro camera of the year to though!

Not the only one!

No direct experience with 80d->6d2, but it's a similar question I faced in 2008, 20d->5d2.

Back then for me, it was a 'no brainer'. Prior to the 20d I had been very accustomed to using a 17-35L...

I'm 'comfy' using 1600 on the 5d2, but try to avoid 3200 if I can, it really is the limit for me, hence why I compared the 5d2 at 3200 against the others, so see what a current sensor would give me...