Matsu

Magnar, Of course you're right, but that doesn't mean a news channel should simply deliver the marketing message as received. The double-entendre in the headline is rather wonderful. Sony...

I really appreciate the work that goes into DPR, but with that said, I think the team is doing a disservice to its readers by publishing such releases. Sony in particular strains credibility to a...

Why should it die?  I can see the progression continuing until we achieve something about the size of the film body FE.  The differences between a DSLR and EVF-ILC are really about the optical ...

I could see such an arrangement making its way to a compact DSLR as a way to use on- sensor focus technologies while retaining an optical viewfinder.  It would cut down the height of the camera, ...

This is not true: in the film days Nikon made medium format lenses for other mounts. However, more significantly, a look at current 135 format lens designs shows us that a number of 135 format ...

I hope that grip is hiding a massive battery. I very much like the 1000-1500 shots per charge on a single battery in my D8xx cameras. An EVF based camera is probably going to need more power than...

First? based on the pictures, I expect the most hand-holdable EVF-ILC to date.

Interesting.  Elsewhere online are what appear to be legit photos/renderings of the front of the camera.  The mount appears large enough for a 44x33 sensor, just a little smaller than the Fuji ...

The OP started with a very clear question that is mainly what we are discussing here, quote: “How does a 36x24mm 46 MP sensor compare to a 54x40mm 100 MP sensor?” Certainly the idea of “look” is ...

I think we get to a point in professional productions were "quality" is largely subjective, not necessarily just a question of measurable properties like resolution and dynamic range, but the ...

I don’t really think we’ll see a medium format sensor in the new mount either, but I do think people tend to make way too big a deal about mount diameter.  Lenses work just fine in F mount, in ...

Even though I started the train of thought here based on the classic triangle proportion 3x4x5, which would indicate a fit for 33x44x55 dimensions, I don't neccessarily think Nikon will do this, ...

No. I’ve followed the press actively for the last 14 years, and worked with the press pool for ten of those (not as a photographer) They use DSLRs, almost exclusively Nikon and Canon, and we’re ...

Nor do I, I just thought it would be fun to play along. This will be a 135 format mount, with some APSC consumer versions and lenses for the low end of the market. Not sure. Nikon has shown they're ...

cropped quasi-MF might be a borderline fit...

Or they could be faking the whole thing from a sound stage in the desert. :p

See my wink... I don't really disagree here, but not so fast. Any understanding of either underlying technology, or history, however extensive, is a poor basis for a decision about tool selection. ...

Diversification in turn allows them to market the best tool for the job into different segments as needed.  For those that prefer an OVF, they’ll have the right tool, and for those with little ...

The answer is not what most people expect, and you’ll find the genesis of the EOS mount spec in the design considerations of its predecessor, the FD breech lock mechanism.  From the start Canon ...

It's plenty. Don't forget that there is some distance between the throat opening and the sensor plane as well. Diagram on this link has a useful comparison of the rumored spec: https://www.dailycam ...