Duckie

Tamron 85/1.8 is much heavier than the Nikon one. Weight is important too (increasingly for me)

Both companies seem to produce mirrorless camera to deliberately prove to their own installed base that it's a bad idea. They correctly estimated that their existing customers are more like to try...

RIP

Good video

Oh I pray that they will extend the privilege to Nikon users, like in the case of the 100/F2.

When one gets caught one gets sued.

I have one with the cap but without the hood. Great lens!

Bouncy is the word that came to my mind at first sight......

At long last mid roll film change for 135! But a bit late I'm off film for donkey years.

LOL!

Me too. Good we all learn something out of it!

LOL!

Wondering if my Pentax Q would appreciate.....

Good to keep digging up new topics, be it agreeable or not.

Everyday people visit your web site in the hope of seeing something new. This insatiable demand for news is very hard to satisfy.

Focusing screens used to be changeable.... until they decided to have a pretentious manual focus friendly body for sale......

You are absolutely right about view finders today. However if one is really keen even a D50's tiny view finder unmodified was good. a D610 is not bad. Nowadays the green dot is very fast, unlike...

OMG I don't need it but i WANT it!

They are better off creating non failing mobile phones. We have two phone with identical model and identical failures.

I got a 28mm Adaptall F2.5. Liked it a lot even in early days (6MP) of digital.

By this logic, you won't even have a basic 50mm lens! (58 and 45 instead) from Nikon. 3rd party manufacturers will be thankful.