Leonard Migliore

This is DPR. Folk with other stuff going on don't belong on this forum (add emoticon of choice here).

I've been taking pictures for decades going on centuries. I used a Canon IIb rangefinder and a 4X5 shooting Royal Ortho. After some years, I got a Nikon D300 and was pretty happy with the results. ...

Interesting. I have both of those devices. I use the phone's camera for documentation but hardly ever try for any artistic statements. I use my RX100 when I travel because it's somewhat better ...

That sounds like your laptop's no good for editing photos; if it changes color and brightness all the time, there's no way you can get consistent results. If you really want control over the ...

I love the range of my 24-120. It covers most of what I want to do. If it only had sharp corners, I wouldn't have to carry a bag of primes around.

Print's going away. Get used to it.

I got my D750 bundled with a 24-120. I went out to shoot some landscapes and found that the lens had poor corner sharpness at typical landscape apertures like f/8 or f/11; I found that ...

Did you buy the camera used? I'm pretty sure that the default rotation setting is ON .

I'm like Nikki Haley. I don't get confused. Yep. Most folks turn a polarizer until unwanted reflections disappear. If you turn the polarizer 90 degrees from where it eliminates the reflections, ...

One might, if one were so inclined, use a polarizer to strengthen the reflections of the buildings in the water. I don't know if the photographer did this or just had the polarizer at some random ...

I also bought my D750 to get clean images in poor light. And I'm also amazed at how well it does this. Works good for other stuff too.

I'm with that option too.

That's good advice. Kit lenses are actually pretty good and you won't see any improvement until you eliminate all the other stuff that's degrading the image.

Yep. That's a good use of a wide-angle lens for portraiture but, as you note, you have to be careful about where you are relative to the subject. Clearly, you're careful.

All those peeny sensors are 4:3

In the specific scenario you describe, both lenses should produce very similar images. That's because at f/16 on a DX camera, you are losing a lot of sharpness to diffraction. So neither image ...

You need to get an 11-22. Maybe a telephoto too, but definitely something wide.

It depends on how much money you want to throw at your hobby. A new crop sensor camera such as the D7500 is a massive improvement on your D100 in every way except for not being able to use AI ...

All else being the same (which it never is), FX is going to be better in low light than DX. I have a D750 which is excellent in low light and is apparently better than a D810 for that. The D810 ...

I have a D750 and think it's great. It takes good pictures in poor light. Really good pictures. Really poor light. The autofocus is excellent in dim conditions and noise is well-controlled even at ...