BfSkinner

Joined on Jun 1, 2012

Comments

Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

BfSkinner: Yes. This photojournalist just got culturally "enriched". True.
Meanwhile, a lady reporter visiting the UK was just arrested for having the audacity to notice the issues with Islam there. (I think her name is Pettibone or something like that).

"She was detained and sent back. I would suggest that is the best that anyone could hope for if they went to any country illegally."
Sounds like a true Trump, MAGA dude!

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2018 at 23:54 UTC
In reply to:

rmexpress22: Maybe they should have pushed the shadows 6 stops so that people could appreciate the Charlotesville picture.

There is a guy literally upside down, but it's not a good picture because it lacks details. This event made national news and impact, but it's not a good picture because of the colors.

To be deep inside that chaos and to have the presence of mind to photograph this as it happens is not easy. I have photographed protests much tamer than this and when there's lots of people around, some breaking things, and even some reaching for your camera to not photograph them, it's not easy.

The picture sums up what Charlotesville seemed to be that day. I think it's a really good image. Anger, hope, love, chaos, humanity, death. All in one picture.

This site really has become something where charts are more important than the photography and the content.

The ongoing trial for that car driver is revealing that this driver was chased to his car (by a guy with a rifle), his car was pummeled, and he was trying to escape a mob that identified him as being a right winger. The court decision is likely to upset some people who think of him as "the villain".

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2018 at 21:07 UTC

Yes. This photojournalist just got culturally "enriched". True.
Meanwhile, a lady reporter visiting the UK was just arrested for having the audacity to notice the issues with Islam there. (I think her name is Pettibone or something like that).

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2018 at 13:36 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

lilBuddha: ISTM, diversify.Photo is merely seeking to give voice to those who have been marginalised. Whether by racism or ignorance.
Why anyone should have issue with this, outside of racists of course, is interesting.

A few notes:

Race does not exist, but racism does because race is Perceived to exist by some and people are judged by their perceived race. Extending this, people naturally group to others they perceive as part of their group. Projects like diversity.Photo seek to expand the definition of what that group includes.

People in the dominant group have difficulty seeing institutionalised racism
Because it does not affect them negatively.
Because they are not, or do not think they are, racist.
Because they think they achieved strictly on merit.

Nope. Nothing like that. Your comment makes no sense. We are saying that we don't want a "Euro-American" photo contest just as we don't want to see any other racially exclusive contest. YOU are the one approving a Jim Crow style contests such as this. Nice try for the sanctimonious, emotional, argumentative technique... the establishment loves you!

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2017 at 00:19 UTC
In reply to:

Pitchertaker: This is a legitimate question so please, no flagging, deleting, or "warnings" about this question: Why is any other "color" or nationality/culture besides Caucasian called "diversity?" So being Caucasian isn't representative of "diversity?" Why not? Who decided this is so? Caucasian culture doesn't have within itself its own "diversity?"

Edward,
Being a pro-athlete is a golden thing and it is the dream of white boys everywhere. Many CEOs would give their left arm to be a pro-athlete...it is a fantasy job. And yet, those nasty bigot CEOs, athletic directors, and coaches keep selecting brown people for those jobs!!! Talk about bad at being bigots!
Yes....the popular....apparently much loved narrative IS INDEED make believe. There is not scheme to keep brown people down.
Google is having convulsions as they try to pound the carpet to find qualified (or even semi-qualified) brown people to hire. Even with that, Google is being called "racist!" (of course) due to their lack of "diversity". They did famously fire a white guy recently, so I guess we should applaud them for that, eh?
You are suggesting the "systemic racism" thing, I suppose. No way...easier to argue just the opposite.

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2017 at 20:20 UTC
In reply to:

Pitchertaker: This is a legitimate question so please, no flagging, deleting, or "warnings" about this question: Why is any other "color" or nationality/culture besides Caucasian called "diversity?" So being Caucasian isn't representative of "diversity?" Why not? Who decided this is so? Caucasian culture doesn't have within itself its own "diversity?"

Sion... what the heck does "whataboutism" have to do with ANY thing that I said.
I am very sensitive to single, anecdotal types of stuff and rarely if ever do that sort of thing.
Wide swaths of non-whites (Asians, Jews) and gay folks do very, very well in the U.S..... a supposed land of white-supremists! With that, I'd say that something else may account for the failure of black Americans to thrive.
They do thrive in entertainment/sports....so, again, why aren't those privilege whites "keeping them down" there? You'd think all of those racist, good ole boy coaches and CEO's would make darn sure to keep non-whites out. Nope. (interestingly, Asians, whites, and Jewish people are massively under-represented in arguably the greatest jobs of all time ...pro athlete).
Again, today's racist, American whites are really, really bad at being racists!

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2017 at 17:02 UTC
In reply to:

lilBuddha: ISTM, diversify.Photo is merely seeking to give voice to those who have been marginalised. Whether by racism or ignorance.
Why anyone should have issue with this, outside of racists of course, is interesting.

A few notes:

Race does not exist, but racism does because race is Perceived to exist by some and people are judged by their perceived race. Extending this, people naturally group to others they perceive as part of their group. Projects like diversity.Photo seek to expand the definition of what that group includes.

People in the dominant group have difficulty seeing institutionalised racism
Because it does not affect them negatively.
Because they are not, or do not think they are, racist.
Because they think they achieved strictly on merit.

You are utterly wrong, Buddha.
You need to take a quick look, yourself. (and not Huffington Post, please)
The basic science is totally clear. There is no debate. Far East Asians are physiologically quite different than, say, Western Africans. It is not a social construct.
Only in the soft sciences (i.e. sociology, and "social issues" academies) is there any controversy on this matter.
Nevertheless, we should treat each other individually....regardless of our group/breed/race averaged differences.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 10:54 UTC
In reply to:

lilBuddha: ISTM, diversify.Photo is merely seeking to give voice to those who have been marginalised. Whether by racism or ignorance.
Why anyone should have issue with this, outside of racists of course, is interesting.

A few notes:

Race does not exist, but racism does because race is Perceived to exist by some and people are judged by their perceived race. Extending this, people naturally group to others they perceive as part of their group. Projects like diversity.Photo seek to expand the definition of what that group includes.

People in the dominant group have difficulty seeing institutionalised racism
Because it does not affect them negatively.
Because they are not, or do not think they are, racist.
Because they think they achieved strictly on merit.

Forensic detectives ROUTINELY identify the race of victims even when they only have access to skeletal remains.
Breeds of people exist just as breeds of dogs exist....even though they are members of the same species

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2017 at 16:17 UTC
In reply to:

mjoshi: Affirmative action for photographers (?) - and this is coming from person of color. So what is next ? Can we have affirmative action in sports too ? There are not enough white people in NBA and NFL and not enough black people in NHL ;)

Yes....this kind of thing is TOTALLY unnecessary these days.....in fact, hasn't been necessary for decades.
The rent-seeking, identity politics, and the power of having the "diversity/inclusion/racism!" card is just too addicting, though.
The new way to identify the most race-obsessed, NON-diverse people is by how very often they refer to identity, race, etc. (just the opposite of what they claim)

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2017 at 20:36 UTC
In reply to:

MikeFairbanks: I don't see this endeavor as racist (the way many do as shown by the comments), but I do believe it's unhealthy and not a step in the right direction.

The thing about photographs is that when we see one, we have no idea who took the photo (unless told ahead of time).

I'm a member of Photography-on-the net, a wonderful site for collaboration, advice, gearheads, etc. I never even thought about who was taking the photos, and their screen names don't reveal race or gender most of the time. Plus, I usually see the photo in a feed first.

It's the same with Instagram. I see amazing photos. My opinion of the picture isn't going to change if I discover that the photographer is white, black, female, male, autistic, has dwarfism, is in a wheelchair, etc.

The photographer is not in the photograph (usually).

So, again, I don't think it's racist (based on our historical injustice toward people of color), but I do think it's misguided and counterproductive.

oh, it's 100% about identity.....and race. We have cultivated ever more clever ways of being divisive. These days, this clever approach allows one to couch oneself as being "against hate", "diverse!", "multi-cultural"...all while very VERY clearly being insulting and exclusive. Exclusive of whom? hmmm...I wonder

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2017 at 16:56 UTC
In reply to:

Terry M: EVERY post in the "most popular" queue (at this point) is denigrating the intent of the database. If THAT doesn't illustrate the problem, nothing will.

People are starting to get wise to the obvious.
Diversity = whites not-welcomed here
That is NOT very loving, passionate, fair ...or... DIVERSE!!!
It is bizarre, exclusionary, and explicitly racist (not subtle racism or micro-aggression....it is full blown, explicitly stated, direct racism)

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 11:18 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): I’m going to have another go at it, just because I think it’s important.

If I’m a white Caucasian in a largely white Caucasian society, I am privileged to always be included and represented by default. I am a member of several associations, which are all predominantly representative of the society in which I live.
For instance, if I’m a member of the British Institute of Professional Photographers, then (by default) I’m a member of the British Institute of white Caucasian Photographers.

Now if I’m a black female photographer, then I’m not represented at all, because I’m in a minority. I can choose to join the British Institute of white Caucasian Photographers, but that won’t help in terms of inclusion and opportunity. So, as all ‘minorities’ have always done, I’ll join the association that represents me, rather than the association that represents the majority.

It isn’t rocket science, and there isn’t any ‘racism’ here. It’s just an attempt at representation and inclusion.

Thanks for trying to explain how it's ok, yet again, for "diversity" to mean "no whites allowed"

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 UTC
In reply to:

jamesfrmphilly: saddens me to see how many racists there are in here......

"Diverse" is apparently the passive aggressive, racist way to say, "whites not welcomed"

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 11:13 UTC
In reply to:

Pitchertaker: This is a legitimate question so please, no flagging, deleting, or "warnings" about this question: Why is any other "color" or nationality/culture besides Caucasian called "diversity?" So being Caucasian isn't representative of "diversity?" Why not? Who decided this is so? Caucasian culture doesn't have within itself its own "diversity?"

Asians and Jewish people are far over-represented in positions of affluence in the U.S. (is that a problem, too?....I don't think so)
White's are lousy at being bigots....that, or they have a strange fetish for Asians and Jewish folks.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:59 UTC
In reply to:

Stigg: Here is Benjamin Franklin's take on this subject:

“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.”

https://qz.com/904933/a-history-of-american-anti-immigrant-bias-starting-with-benjamin-franklins-hatred-of-the-germans/

It looks like this deranged belief known as racism and its psychotic definitions of fictitious "races" was birthed in the Anglo mind and spread throughout the world and was so devastating that it encouraged the subjugation and destruction of "lesser races" throughout the globe - including the genocides of N & S America.

I thankfully live in NYC, the most diverse city of ethnicities on the planet, and I would not reside here if it were not that way. Its why I left my home country of England decades ago. I reject the concept of races. There is only the human race.

How cute, Stigg thinks that racism was birthed in the 1700's!
As with other religions (earth is 6,000 yrs old?).....he thinks racism is Euro-specific and a few hundred years old.
Charming, these religious views.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:57 UTC
In reply to:

Clyde Thomas: Web site states "self identified ethnicity".

So I can identify with whatever ethnicity I desire.

Client won't know until contract is signed and I'm on the job. Then they fire me on the spot. Then I sue them for... racism?

I love this world. Just love love love it.

How could they fire you? Are they going to do a test of your DNA?
You can identify as whatever you like!
The new religion is a delight.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:53 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: White christians are now a minority in the United States, and not taking it very well judging by the comments here.

fmian - As long as they are judging white skin colour, it is culturally acceptable to stereotype, mock, and cast judgement.
Remember the plight of the Jewish people in early-1900's Europe? They were considered "privileged" and openly resented by the rest.
You need to get with the new religion.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:51 UTC
In reply to:

cybertec69: This progressive diversity experiment has destroyed the West. Diversity, these progressives make me laugh, all this diversity nonsense has done nothing more than destroyed cultures and soon civilizations.

Roustabout -
Rationality doesn't matter in the face of the new orthodoxy/religion.
Here is the new religion for white folks.
You must admit that you are a sinner....even if you truly don't think you sin.
ooops...scratch that....replace the word 'sinner' with 'racist'.
And that's just rule #1.
Of course, if you fail to recognize this holy truth, then you are a heretic.
ooops...scratch that.... replace the word 'heretic' with "racist" or "bigot"...or "Hitler".
You are being placed in a corner with this dogma, and there is no logical way out.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:45 UTC
In reply to:

lilBuddha: ISTM, diversify.Photo is merely seeking to give voice to those who have been marginalised. Whether by racism or ignorance.
Why anyone should have issue with this, outside of racists of course, is interesting.

A few notes:

Race does not exist, but racism does because race is Perceived to exist by some and people are judged by their perceived race. Extending this, people naturally group to others they perceive as part of their group. Projects like diversity.Photo seek to expand the definition of what that group includes.

People in the dominant group have difficulty seeing institutionalised racism
Because it does not affect them negatively.
Because they are not, or do not think they are, racist.
Because they think they achieved strictly on merit.

Sounds like lilBuddha has got religion. Gee, if only these blind people could see the real truth.
sigh.
you must have gone to college

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:23 UTC
In reply to:

Thematic: When I was younger in elementary school, children were told to execute projects just like this that promoted their "cultural heritage" - a few months later all the kids were seen mingling on playgrounds in separate ethnic groups.

None of us kids saw race.....until the adults told us to see race.

It's sick. Gone are the days of a melting pot - its the salid bowl ideology that places an emphasis on what you are, vs what you accomplish.

Very sick. And sickening that children are exposed to this.

And yes, im black and sick of it.

It is easier to argue that it has been open season on whites for decades. Want to make jokes or disparage the character of whites? Go for it without hesitation! Want to say something unsavory about any other group? a very, very bad idea.
I say, we should all address each other as humans....and accept that sometimes, some people say rude things. It's no big deal. As a "Euro-American", I have experience quite a bit of explicit racism... as well as other kinds of rudeness. That is life on earth. Truly, it is no big deal.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 10:20 UTC
Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »