hectorsm

Thanks for the clarification. I will give your suggestion a try. It's good to know that there's a way to get ACDSee to auto detect the lens profile. That should save me some time from having to ...

Maybe I'm not understanding what you are saying but for me, by my ACDSee 2022 seem to autodetect my camera and lens fine but not the lens profile. This is the way it looks like after I enable the ...

That's not a bug, but rather a lack of auto detect. It happens to all of my lenses and cameras in version 2022. ACDSee should add an auto detect in the lens profile to match the current lens, but ...

It's not to the level of either of those two. ACDSee was primarily meant to be a raw developer with a good DAM. Pixel editing is just supplemental... just my opinion. I have use ACDSee Ultimate 2022. ...

Strange indeed.  Glad you got that fixed. Hector

I'm wondering if your ACDSee package could be corrupt. I don't have a Sony A7R mark ii but I was able find sample raw files (uncompressed) from 2 different sources on the web. My test show that ...

I've been using Ultimate 2022 for about 9 months now.  My wife and I use it a lot.  I have not encounter any issues so far.  Although I'm sure bugs exist, I have not found it to be buggy at all. Hector

You can also try posting your question in the ACDSee forum to see if you get any additional feedback. https://forum.acdsee.com/ I personally don't think you'll be able to read the keywords from ...

That could be the difference between the way the Mac and the Windows version works.  I played with the rating by changing back and forth between PL5 and ACDSee and it carries over between the two ...

As far as I know, you cannot read ACDSee Keywords in Photolab. They are store in their own XMP section. Unless a program is written to find and pull these values, they will get ignored. Here is ...

Regarding the rating, yes you can.  In addition to embedding the metadata to the file in ACDSee, you must also read the newly set metadata in PhotoLab here: If you set the rating in Photolab, it ...

I use ACDSee. Hector

I don't think it's a scam. It's not like they're not delivering the features they promised. The new features may not be worth the price, but they're not deceiving you and you're not forced to buy ...

I have the same scanner.  Using 24bit color and 2400dpi gives seems to give me the best compromise. The jpeg files are around 20mb. I felt that anything beyond 2400dpi was giving me diminishing ...

lokatz, Here is a link to an ACDSee a xmp file. https://www.filemail.com/d/vfbjvhzoflcttwe Here is a summary of how the keyword xmp code looks like: <acdsee:keywords> <rdf:Bag> <rdf:li>Places</rdf:li>

Noooo!... the Borg is coming :-). That will mean less choice for us non-subscribers. I hope not. Hector

Raw files have a greater degree of adjustments, which allows for potentially better results than using an image file. Therefore, I always keep my raw files. Hector