m_black

You have to go into the HDMI menu setting and enable the camera to start recording on the Ninja.

Nope. And yup. This type of body is actually quite comfortable to "lug around" all day. For sports shooters with greater than 200mm lenses attached, it's more of the same but lighter and smaller...

You don’t need to wait then. You have your perfect camera. Congrats! I’ve played with a colleague’s a1 and it’s great and all. Still not what I prefer though.

Eye control AF won’t always apply or be needed/wanted. In some situations you may want to keep the AF on a static subject (speech at a wedding for example) but survey the rest of the scene looking ...

And unless you’re an accountant at Nikon, you have no idea either. What was your business?

@hawtedawg, have you ever used a Canon or Nikon camera with integrated grip? Totally different experience than even an un gripped body from the same brand. Let alone the a1.

Well, all the arguing and negativity that typically happens by the fanboys of other brands is over in the news section of the new Canon flagship. It's been civil here as a result. :-)

"Should be 150 at most" ....coming from someone with 'Leica' in their handle name. You have no idea what it costs to produce this. And at the moment, the cost of shipping might approach the cost...

The days of a dentist are numbered because we can get dental floss, tooth brushes and tooth paste from our local pharmacy or grocery store. Right? No. People will always need higher levels of...

Well, in fairness, more light is getting to the Z sensor, and equally so, with a 6.3 lens than 5.6 on F mount where the light has to be bounced down into the AF sensor array. And the wider the AF ...

Good burn I think. Ok, so maybe 2 instead of a dozen.

You’re looking at a single metric. A sports photographer doesn’t have one body. They likely have 5-6. 5 or 6 pumping out 24mp in bursts of 20 images a second. All the data adds up, in terms of...

f/6.3 seems to be Nikon’s new 5.6. And this could take the place of the 70-300. F mount 70-300 4-5.6 begats Z mount 100-400 4.5-6.3. Pure speculation of course. We’ll know soon enough.

Well, in all fairness, EVF tech moves faster than camera tech and “a few years back” EVFs were not at where they are today.

Regarding size…. None of the big manufacturers said that. Olympus did as...

That’s cool if you don’t need it. No shame in that admission. It’s ok to keep waiting for your perfect camera. But I doubt that will ever materialize.

What’s the weight difference? I’m sure people who use these cameras will find the weight is negligible when mounted to a 400 2.8, and lighter than a 1Dx and lighter/smaller than a gripped R5.

Leica leaves the room awkwardly….

Not everyone needs 50mp. But they do need a comfortable grip and all day batteries. A built in grip is usually lighter, smaller and more water proof than a body with add on grip.

I don’t care what market share any of the companies are in. That’s for the Sony fan boys to do while they stand around a loaf of bread. As long as the company is profitable, and has loads of cash...

There will always be opinions on why they or Canon did right or wrong. Peruse the Canon R forums and you get comments like “why did Canon start with exotic expensive zooms? And then follow up with...