yortuk

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 24, 2011

Comments

Total: 17, showing: 1 – 17
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I thought the GH4 had auto ISO in manual mode? Does the GH5 have Auto ISO in manual mode plus exposure compensation?

@Miki, the specs say the GH5 does 4K with no crop. Every other mirrorless or DSLR that I'm aware of uses a significant crop. The result is that for 4K video the GH5 has effectively as large a sensor as those other larger format cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 21:30 UTC
In reply to:

Miki Nemeth: A long awaited feature (still ?) missing from Panasonic cameras is MF Assist while recording. I wonder, if this camera, first in Panasonic's life, is supporting that damn function at last? I have an FZ2000, and it's excellent, but terribly infuriating that MF Assist doesn't work, when I start recording. MF Assist along with the excellent focus peaking WHILE recording would be so great. It's great that the hilarious 4K crop was gone. Unfortunately, I still have a crazy 36mm 4K crop on my FZ2000. With all these bells-and-whistles the GH5 should have included an APS-C sensor, just like JVC did with the LS300. That would have been a Sony/Canon killer. This way the GH5 is just a very strong competitor with a hell lot of limitations. Low-light wedding videographers with their brutal A7Sii's, will not get very enthusiastic, I guess, but a GH5 with an APS-C 12M 4K (low-light) optimized sensor, that would have been a king. As Andrew Reid would write, Panasonic again missed the opportunity.

And which lenses would you propose to use with your imaginary APS-C GH5?

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 21:13 UTC
In reply to:

SteveY80: I'm not sure anyone else will care, but to me it's a bit of a shame that the 45-175mm hasn't been updated too. It's a great little lens and doesn't extend when zooming - it must be one of the few lenses that doesn't support dual IS.

I wonder if there'll be some bargain 35-100 f/2.8 mk1s appearing on the used market any time soon?

Also Panasonic promised a dual-IS firmware upgrade for the 45-175 that's now going on two years late. I bought the lens specifically with that feature in mind, so it's very frustrating that they seem to have forgotten about it.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 21:03 UTC
On article Google publishes gallery from upcoming Pixel smartphone (158 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): For a phone, those are pretty darned good! If my phone took pictures like that I would be very happy. One question though - why are the skateboard's wheels square? Is that rolling shutter in action or some other anomoly?

They actually look that way in person. It's an interesting optical illusion. You can get a better look at https://sharkwheel.com/

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2016 at 01:30 UTC
On article Google's Pixel phones: What you need to know (122 comments in total)
In reply to:

DualSystemGuy: Some additional less obvious details:

- Storage is UFS 2.0
- 192kHz/24bit Audio
- Uses 18W charging through a USB- C power specification rather than Qualcomm quick charge 3.0
- Google optimized its HDR algorithm to run on the SD 821 Hexagon 680 DSP (instead of the CPU), using vector instructions to handle HDR processing with no shutter lag. This also saves battery life.
- The sensors just below the ear piece are for ambient light and proximity
- The free Google Photo storage includes original quality 4K video
- The highly impressive electronic video stabilization does not work with 4K (1080P/60 max)
- Even the Pixel's front/selfie camera uses a larger sensor than the iPhone 7 Plus' telephoto camera
- It has a notification LED
- Water resistance is IP53

I'm pretty sure that's 192 kbits per second data rate, not audio frequency.

edit: also, 20kHz is pretty much the max audible frequency, and people my age it's more like 16kHz.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 18:28 UTC
In reply to:

newe: In reading numerous Android forums there SEEMS to be a lot of hate towards these new phones. Many think this is Google wanting to be Apple. Price is insane. Some have posted Canadian prices are $1,100. Who in their right mind would pay that for a phone with no SD card? I'm wondering if this will turn out to be a bad move for Google pricing this way. I bet OnePlus is happy!

I've had the Nexus 4 and 5 and loved them...won't be getting the new Google phones, the price/value proposition is not there for me in the least.

@tkbslc, I'm not aware of any prepaid plan that provides comparable service for $20/month. $10/GB for data is expensive, but I've never used that much data on mobile.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 03:42 UTC
In reply to:

newe: In reading numerous Android forums there SEEMS to be a lot of hate towards these new phones. Many think this is Google wanting to be Apple. Price is insane. Some have posted Canadian prices are $1,100. Who in their right mind would pay that for a phone with no SD card? I'm wondering if this will turn out to be a bad move for Google pricing this way. I bet OnePlus is happy!

I've had the Nexus 4 and 5 and loved them...won't be getting the new Google phones, the price/value proposition is not there for me in the least.

@GodSpeaks, do you live in the US? With T-Mobile I paid $40/month for unlimited everything (but slower data after 5GB), and now pay $50/month which includes service in Canada. The Project Fi service will be between $20-$30/month based on my current data usage, but more expensive when visiting Canada, i.e. $0.20/minute for calls not using a wifi connection, but with free texting, and mobile data is the same as the US. Also calls from US to Canada are free.

Mobile data on Project Fi is $10/GB, so it's not as good for people who use a lot of mobile data, but I get most of my data on wifi so it's not an issue for me. Also, the whole point of Project Fi is that it seamlessly transitions to wifi whenever it can and has a large network of wifi hotspots in place.

I know lots of people here who pay upwards of $70/month. And these rates are actually much better than my brother in Canada pays. He was looking into visiting the US to sign up for the $50 plan I have so he could use it in Canada.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 03:34 UTC
In reply to:

newe: In reading numerous Android forums there SEEMS to be a lot of hate towards these new phones. Many think this is Google wanting to be Apple. Price is insane. Some have posted Canadian prices are $1,100. Who in their right mind would pay that for a phone with no SD card? I'm wondering if this will turn out to be a bad move for Google pricing this way. I bet OnePlus is happy!

I've had the Nexus 4 and 5 and loved them...won't be getting the new Google phones, the price/value proposition is not there for me in the least.

I was with you guys, but then I checked out the Project Fi service plan (which is only available with Google's phones) and right off the bat I'd be saving over $300/year over T-Mobile while getting better network coverage (the main drawback I've had with T-Mobile). So I figure this way the phone pays for itself in a couple years. With this service plan there really is no other high-end phone that can compete on price/value.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 00:11 UTC
In reply to:

SeeRoy: Wow, new bags! Awesome! Trific! Kwool! Up to now there have been so few to chose from!

And yet I can never find one I like.

Link | Posted on Jul 13, 2016 at 20:18 UTC
In reply to:

Marc Ramirez: What pictures could be more important than ones of your kids? Of course that is where you want to use your nicest lenses.

The dyslexic in me thinks you're a horrible parent.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 20:31 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (680 comments in total)
In reply to:

Donnie G: Want to produce 4K video on the cheap, complete with all of those wonderful overheating moments, then buy any 4K capable Sony mirrorless ILC. Want to produce and also star in your very own 1080 HD video, complete with pro level audio, AF, and zoom that you control remotely from your smartphone without the need for assistance from anybody and with total reliability from your kit? Canon, and only Canon can give you that. Pro level selfie stills and videos are easy to produce with this new Canon kit. Nobody else has anything like it at or even near its very affordable price point. :))

Panasonic does all that for less money and 4K video as well. Their G7 does it for half the price of this new Canon, and even their top end GH4 is a couple hundred dollars less. The GX8 also.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 13:16 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1495 comments in total)
In reply to:

Flashback: Wow, you won't want to drop that on one of your toes!

Considering the cost, I think it would be worth sacrificing a toe to cushion its fall.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 19:09 UTC
On article Best Camera of 2012: And the Winner is... (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andreas Stuebs: Congratulation Olympus for this success!
I must admit, I did not vote for the OMD. Mainly because when I handled it in the shop I was not happy how it felt in my hand. And also, I do not really like electronic viewfinders preferring a bright optical viewfinder. But even so - it is a well deserved win for a nice camera even if it does not suit me.
The question of the poll is rather silly. As if there can be "the best camera". There are so many different uses that there can be for each use a best camera. A camera,which tries to suit all, risks becoming a jack of all trades and a master of none. Having said that, it is quite impressive for a fairly small camera maker (compared to the BIG TWO and their fanbase) to come top of the poll. A bit like Tottenham coming out on top of the polls in the UK vs. ManU, Arsenal, Liverpool, and Chelsea.

The use of the word "best" is certainly problematic, though it's actually stated as "best of 2012", which I think can be taken to imply an emphasis on newness and innovation. Maybe "most interesting new camera" would make a better title, but then maybe that's the Lytro.

edit: on second thought, I'm going to go with the Nokia 41 megapixel camera phone.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2013 at 22:40 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nokia 808 PureView Review (208 comments in total)
In reply to:

WilliamJ: As far as I'm concerned, I do not care going out without my phone as I don't use it so much, but I absolutely can't bear being without any camera. Thus, I wonder if one day, we won't have such a news not about a phone that can be used as a "quite good" camera but about a camera than can be used as a phone. I think, by the way, that the time is near when the "phone function" won't be an independent one and it will be added on demand as an application to any item of your choice: a watch, a pair of sunglasses, a key holder, a shoe... It will get smart ! In that case only, I will maybe be interested in a "camera that can take good pictures". Otherwise, out of the question !

Polaroid tried to go that way: http://androidandme.com/2012/01/devices/polaroid-sc1630-phonecamera-is-a-great-on-the-camera-not-so-much-on-the-phone/

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 18:44 UTC
In reply to:

vtinitus: Is there really a lumix 7mm-300mm lens? I couldn't find it anywhere...

@yabokkie That's nonsense. For exposure purposes it's 4.0-5.6. The "equivalent" numbers you give are only relavent for comparing depth of field. Just think of it as cropping the picture. If you have a full-frame camera w/300mm lens and you crop the image, that has no effect on exposure.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2012 at 18:34 UTC
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: I think Canon is on the right track and in the right direction to push their sales. It puts the quality APS-C sensor into a very pocketable camera. Now, we can use a small camera to capture high quality pictures.
The form factor of M43 is small but unfortunately the lenses available for M43 are very limited; and the sensor of M43 is too small! Before I saw this new Canon, I considered to buy a M43; but now I would not consider M43 anymore.
NEX5N is not bad but the range of Sony lenses cannot be compared with Canon.
Now, what I'm waiting is a similiar product from Nikon. It will be so good if there is a pocketable mirrorless APS-C camera from Nikon.

M43 currently has 30 or so lenses from five manufacturers, with new ones being introduced all the time. This new Canon only has two lenses. Of course there's a vast array of Canon lenses that can be used with the adapter, but then it's not really a compact camera anymore.

As for the sensor-size, that's certainly a valid point, but sensor size affects how small you can make the system, including lenses.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
In reply to:

Lee Jay: And I thought lenses for small sensors were supposed to be smaller and cheaper than lenses for full-frame. The Canon 85/1.8 (an excellent lens optically with very fast ring USM focusing and good build quality) goes for $389 at B&H right now.

Shouldn't this lens, with shorter focal length and thus a smaller aperture, designed for a 1/4 sized sensor go for around $250 or so?

You people are all morons! The m4/3 75/1.8 is exactly equivalent to a FF 85/1.8, when used three paces farther from the subject! Approximately. Anyway, m4/3 is exactly equivalent to FF, for people with social phobias.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 17:44 UTC
Total: 17, showing: 1 – 17