Lives in Norway Norway
Joined on Jun 15, 2011


Total: 217, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Nukunukoo: Wold definitely be a game changer IF Adobe Photoshop port their apps to run on the Pros with Pencil support. The new IOS 11 can handle it now... Edit: Affinity Photo is now on the Pro. FTW =)

It's not just about computing power. Both Macs and PCs have very different environment for juice sapping applications. IOS is still an OS for apps. Not applications.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 07:06 UTC
In reply to:

M Chambers: I'm sure Canon fanboys will love this. The form factor is horrible! It's clearly meant to look like a big SLR instead of a pro video camera.

I guess you don't have to be a fanboy to use it. They design it for the pro videographer in mind. The form factor is so that it is better suited to be attached to a rig. Which the pros usually do. Normal DSLR design is not as suited for rigging.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 07:36 UTC
In reply to:

mariuss: Nice camera ...
Will this camera have ANY impact to the Canon 6D2 video features?
4K? Framerate? More DR? Better codec?
6D2 with better video as 5D4, maybe?

I don't care about the 6D II having 4K video. For amateurs the 4K feature is just too expensive to use. Canon already has 4K solutions for those who can afford the 1DXII or 1D C cameras, or the cinema cameras.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 07:34 UTC
In reply to:

Impulses: No Type C is a pretty big turnoff, they need to get with it.

Turnoff? You can buy a dongle to get one. Instead of all the dongles you need if you only have Type C.... Like Macbook ......

Link | Posted on May 24, 2017 at 13:38 UTC
On article Analog gems: 10 excellent, affordable film cameras (950 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tim Gander: Those that have been listed will be going up in value now. I'll add this one because I safely have two now, the Canon EOS 1N. Ok, it's a lump, it's loud and nowhere near as cool and chic as an F3, but it's built like a hammer, packed with incredible tech, has AF reliability that blows even some recent DSLRs away and I picked up a second one (the first I bought new circa 1998 and it's still going strong) on Ebay for £160 including the drive booster! Everyone wants the EOS 1V which is much pricier, but heck if you can't take a decent photo with the 1N, the 1V won't save you!

At the other end of the scale, I love my Konica Pop which I picked up from a charity shop for £15. They're a bit of a cult amongst the hipsters and you can easily pay £50 for one. Apart from the flash, there's almost nothing can go wrong with the Pop!

The 1V is very good. It has a lots of electronics inside though. So if you want to go fully manual that is not the camera for you.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2017 at 22:31 UTC
On article Looking back: Canon's eye-controlled focus (233 comments in total)

it would be nice, with eye controlled focus. Especially when taking shallow DOF pictures.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2017 at 08:23 UTC as 68th comment
On article Looking back: Canon's eye-controlled focus (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Father Bouvier: Fast forward year 2050.

Every Canon camera now comes with a free brain implant AF chip. The newest Canon EOS eBrain mk IV camera is head mounted and uses Near Field Communication. Canon still struggles with noise. Signal is too noisy, you have to shave all hair for camera to work. Bald people rejoice. The rest threaten to switch to Nikon, which still manufactures bodies for screwdrive lenses from 70 years ago.

Sony just finished automating the last part of photography: the need to move around. The new camera Sony Droid A0 is mounted on a robot that travels on its own and takes pictures with perfect exposure, focus, and framing, and then even watches pictures for you. Its cost is just $99999.99, and includes 3 free years of travel for the robot. What a deal! It saves so much money and efforts.

Metabones is now working on an adapter for the robot to use Canon chips ...

It is difficult to predict the future, but I don't think you are even close to the correct picture.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2017 at 08:18 UTC
In reply to:

Kiril Karaatanasov: So Canon's strategy to ditch photography is paying off! Sounds good for shareholders.

They are not ditching it, but the customers of today want something else than for 10 years ago.... You can't win by just having the best sensor. In videography canon is doing much better than Nikon, and I guess that many buy Canon SLRs because theya re good for taking video as well as decent photos.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 11:28 UTC
In reply to:

TomCodyPleasedToMeetYa: They needn't have bothered, as according to the wise heads on here, Canon are officially dead and buried, so they may as well shut up shop today.

Actually they are doing much better than Nikon these days as far as I know.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 19:28 UTC
In reply to:

AlephNull: The man who shot my wedding used Hasselblad. Gosh, I guess I picked the wrong photographer!

Hasselblad is good. But overkill for most.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2017 at 01:38 UTC
On article Canon announces the XC15 4K video camera (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcel: Does the XLR connection support a +24V/+48V DC output ?

It would be strange if it did not support phantom power for mic.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2016 at 22:31 UTC

I hope that third party developers also implement this adjustments in their software when the raw image is of this type.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2016 at 16:44 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EOS 5D IV: What you need to know (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

Antal I Kozma: Looks good, however, the buffer capacity for RAW images is seriously undersized. Why on earth they did not increase it to 50-60 at least?

That is why you should buy the 1D XII . They don't want it to compete too much with the top model.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2016 at 11:07 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2169 comments in total)
In reply to:

zanypoet: I may be nitpicking ...
I use both Nikon and Canon gear; built-in viewfinder shutter should be a std. feature on camera like this. Nikon has'em on their D800 series.

Otherwise, increased DR on par with Sony and Nikon is a welcome change ...

yes, build in viewfinder shutter should be standard on a $3500 camera.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2016 at 08:48 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2169 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: Considering that most cameras are now able to handle most situations required by most photographers, and there are far too many photographers around, a technologically conservative approach I do not think works as well nowadays. I thinking cameras offering more creative options are more valuable than cameras perfecting and consolidating old school photography, but missing the edge. Dual Pixel tech is realistically the only piece of technology that can be innovative here yet I think there are cameras out there that offer to explore photography more creatively, the worse part is that this camera will be around for at least 4 years...

what do you mean by "creative options" ?

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2016 at 08:45 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2169 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: 1D x II, check. 5D Mark IV, check. Great, that's the pro's needs covered. Now, wouldn't the 6D's update, aimed at enthusiasts, be the perfect candidate to become Canon's first FF mirrorless? Give it a 24~28 MP dual pixel sensor, a swivel touchscreen, and a body slightly larger than the a7 line for good ergonomics (+ larger battery and heat sink), and see what happens. At the 6D's pricepoint, I think that would soar.

(I fully expect the anti-Canon fanboys to jump on this with fervour, so just to reiterate my main point: isn't the target audience of the 6D line the perfect FF mirrorless crowd in Canon-land?)

a canon mirrorless would not have a mark IV on it. It would be a new lineup.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 07:16 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2169 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jozef M: Does the body really is only 75 gram? Numbers, numbers, numbers ...

lighter than 5D mk III.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 07:11 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2169 comments in total)
In reply to:

Neuropsychology: Won't be ditching my a6300 as planned. I'll just keep it. Somewhat disappointed Canon.

What is dissapointing with it? For me the new Canon is very good indeed.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 07:11 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: Does it work in a raid 5 config?

if the raid driver support that large drives.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2016 at 13:50 UTC
On article Epson's 4K home projectors to go on sale next month (63 comments in total)

The projector is NOT 4K. It is a 1080p projector. But with enhancement of the image to emulate higher resolution. The title here is misleading.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2016 at 08:49 UTC as 16th comment
Total: 217, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »