oysso

Lives in Norway Norway
Joined on Jun 15, 2011

Comments

Total: 217, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

kewlguy: I thought releasing the 6D2 with sub-par sensor was offensive already :)

salsaguy: AF is not only about number of focus points, but how fast the camera actually aquire focus, and how good it follows moving objects during shooting. The high end Canon SLRs are among the best in that aspect. And we can hope that the mirrorless range to be equal or better than those cameras.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2018 at 10:28 UTC
In reply to:

kewlguy: I thought releasing the 6D2 with sub-par sensor was offensive already :)

FF is only for the few. To have major parts of a marked share you must think of the point and shooters. And they want something pocketable, or almost pocketable. Even the enthusiasts want a small camera as a light travel camera sometimes.

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2018 at 08:57 UTC

No pay, then no goods(pictures). That is just simple. That is for all business. But maybe it was the first time that person did a business deal in his life. ( or maybe the first time he broke a contract ).

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2018 at 13:21 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

RubberDials: These are the sales figures that matter:

FF mirrorless sales

Sony - 99.9%
Leica - 0.1%
Canon - 0%

Canon has FF camera with mirror, and ? They have just not seen the benefit for the camera yet. Mirrorless has some benefits. But DSLR has some advantages over mirrorless still. Faster autofocus is still very important for many photographers. And better supply of lenses is another. Better ergonomics is a third reason. In ergonomics Sony has something to learn from both Nikon and Canon.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2018 at 08:39 UTC

Google, Apple, Microsoft etc. are spying on the rest of the world. Should we be concerned?

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 14:06 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies

It is the graphics card on iMac pro that makes the difference. Adobe software use the graphics card heavily. The 1070 card on the alienware is cheap. By buying a better graphics card you can get much better results.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2018 at 16:39 UTC as 24th comment

By building a PC from parts for doing multimedia, you would get even better results per buck used for a PC.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2018 at 16:35 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

RubberDials: These are the sales figures that matter:

FF mirrorless sales

Sony - 99.9%
Leica - 0.1%
Canon - 0%

FF mirrorless is in most respecs equivalent with SLR .

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2018 at 14:21 UTC
In reply to:

JordanAT: Portrait of the man is awful. The water behind him is completely in focus. These "pros" don't even know how to use the Portrait setting on their phones. It's like they're not even trying. Fake photos. Sad.

As long as the background is not cluttered, there is no apparent reason to blur the background. The image has clear focal point regardless of having in focus background.

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2017 at 08:26 UTC

The storytelling is lacking here. Too much one type of movement. And too long. Should be able to tell a better story in less time.

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 10:08 UTC as 11th comment

I thought that film marked is so small that this actually is a flop. Most photographers who still use film are dedicated photgraphers, and know how to make special effects.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 13:52 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

capeminiol: We self-respecting film shooters know how to create our own light leaks, thank you.

If you have a camera where you can't double expose in a controlled way, then this is an alternative.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 13:41 UTC
In reply to:

VEK: With development of mirrorless cameras I want cameras without center placed viewfinders so i do not have to press my nose to the backside.
Make alle mirrorless cameras with the viewfinders at the left side!

If you shoot with both eyes open to be able to see the surroundings at same times as you shoot, then having viewfinder in middle, makes it possible. If it is on the left, it is perfect if you are right eyed, because you have good space to look around at same time. Depends on the subject matter though. If you are left eyed, then you can't see the surroundings when looking into the viewfinder.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2017 at 13:10 UTC
In reply to:

VEK: With development of mirrorless cameras I want cameras without center placed viewfinders so i do not have to press my nose to the backside.
Make alle mirrorless cameras with the viewfinders at the left side!

If the viewfinder is in the middle it suits both left and right eyed people equally.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2017 at 07:52 UTC
On article Here's why your beloved film SLR is never going digital (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg Beetham: The one thing I would like about a film resurgence is the reality factor, of course that could still fall by the wayside once the scanning and transferral to Photoshop is done but at least there is the original negative/positive that doesn’t lie.
But cost is the big factor now, I suppose if there is enough support costs might go down to an acceptable level.
I wonder if Kodak is going to make MF sizes, 120-220 in Ektachrome. And what about chemistry kits for those with drum processors? CIBACHROME prints too? YooHoo ILFORD where are you?
It’s probably one of the most anticipated moments, opening the drum after processing a couple of 8x10 CIBACHROME prints, digital colour printing with a photo printer doesn’t quite achieve the same degree of expectation.

You have a processing step in film too. Especially for colour prints. Less so with dias.

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2017 at 06:33 UTC
In reply to:

minzaw: What is YOUR definition of CINEMATIC???.........

KeepCalm: Cinematic are technique used as well as technical quality of the footage. But mostly how it is filmed. You don't need 4K to make it cinematic.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2017 at 07:23 UTC
In reply to:

minzaw: What is YOUR definition of CINEMATIC???.........

I guess it is as long as it looks like it could be used in a cinematic movie it is cinematic.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 11:51 UTC
On article The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need (1067 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathantw: "The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need" -- headline

Until something else comes out.

I guess the headline is because it is good for all types of shooting. So you don't have to have a second body for some types of shoots.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2017 at 07:24 UTC
On article Incredible microscopic close-ups of a peacock feather (80 comments in total)
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: I don't think this is 'microscopic.' Details on a peacock feather can be seen with the naked eye. You can look at this kind of detail even with a magnifying glass. Microscopic indicates a view on a cellular level. Just sayin'.

it is microscopic if you can't see it with naked eye. And that starts at much less magnifications than at cellular level.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 06:56 UTC
On article Incredible microscopic close-ups of a peacock feather (80 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bambi24: The title of this article is "MICROscopic".

The content of this article is "MACRO photography".

A microscopic image of a feather looks like this: https://www.owlpages.com/owls/articles/images/eagle_owl_feather_paolo_taranto-1.jpg

Tommi K1: yes. For feathers with such vibrant colours. i will defenately say that colours in the photos is half point doing the photos. The structure is also interesting. But without colours it would be less interesting for me at least.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 06:52 UTC
Total: 217, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »