AshMills

Presumably a handler took exception to it...?

Amazing job, really dull photos.

I'm enjoying reading the comments of those who don't spot the idea of the OP.

Anyone tried this combo?

Exactly, there could be that image of the grassy knoll, or just the most precious memory, with enough clues to get it back to the grateful family. I dropped a roll of film in the ice in Siberia...

That's silly.

Anyone else find this touchingly sad?

Every sensible lens is smaller than that silly behemoth. (the Sony 90)

Err yes, but that lens is almost hilariously huge.

Would this have been news 10 years ago?

Our eyes work quite well with curved sensors.

If they went with a mirror-less mount that needed an adaptor to use G mount lenses, there could be the possibility of space for an optical element to add curvature to the image. I had imagined a...

I got 6/10 too. Harder than I thought too, as the standard of the changes was higher than the standard of photography, if that makes sense. I was looking for "edits" - perhaps should have looked...

Great photos, thanks.

The Monkey has presumably retired to Monaco?

Just an idea, but how about a F mount body with DX sized mirrorless spec chip, then using a dedicated speedbooster optically designed to optimise the FF Nikon glass to cover the DX sensor, (ie so...

Just an idea, but how about a DX sized mirrorless spec chip, then using a dedicated speedbooster optically designed to optimise the FF Nikon glass to cover the DX sensor, (ie so you get...

Nikoncanonfan- that's just silly. Would you not have a Porsche as its a VW rebrand, a Ferrari is a Fiat? You going to ignore all the professional Sony gear out there?

I think they could surely build in a deep enough mount and stay relatively smaller than D600 - no prism or mirror mechanics, even if they kept the air gap with same flange distance.

Could be over use of the highlight slider - pulling back too far can do this.