CBR1100XX

On mine it's the GPU that really gets it sounding like a jet engine.  100% CPU isn't nearly as bad. That's with a GTX1050 Ti. The MX150 is pretty low power so it shouldn't be too bad.

I shot with both side by side and the 10 is a better camera than the 5 in terms of usage to me at least. This big difference was there larger number of AF points and better feeling buttons on the ...

The first option doesn't have an upgradable GPU so that's an issue. Also Dell/HP have a much better service network. The HP's video card is really weak for gaming. The Alienware is alright but will ...

I just looked at the benchmarks and at least with passmark your current processor is faster than the i5-7300 and the i7-7700HQ is only about 15% faster. Also I'm posting from pretty much that exact ...

Would it be roughly equivalent to a 35 F1.8 on full frame?  If so then I can say that it'll work well for some portraits but especially close in shots of products or food especially when on site ...

Fingers crossed. I love my E-M10 mkII's but their C-AF performance is the biggest issue limiting what I can use them for and I just can't justify the price of the E-M1 mkII...either the E-M5 needs ...

Having my catalog on an SSD has done away with the lag while culling through photos in Lightroom.  Also on spinning drives they'll be the bottleneck while importing RAW files with my new computer.

I have an i7700HQ laptop and it's decent enough and a nice jump from my older Xeon W3540 which is close to your current desktop (and that I retired a few years ago for being too slow). It's about ...

Tokina 11-20 f2.8 or the newer Sigma 10-20 are both nice, personally I went with the former and use it along with the D7200 for my landscapes.  I also have a D750 and the size/weight penalty ...

Beyond the fanboys for either side once you're heavily invested it takes a lot to switch.  Yes my Nikon bodies are better than my friends Canon equivalents in image quality.  And while it's ...

They have the market share.  Most people I know shoot Canon so if you're working with them, or an up and coming person and talk to them you're likely to go with Canon. When I started Canon had a ...

It's a pretty amazing camera, but I could go for a wider AF area, larger buffer, and better high ISO performance since I shoot available light for the vast majority of my work. That being said if a ...

"In this upcoming Lightroom Classic 7.2 release, we were able to make significant strides with our partners at Intel on addressing key performance issues. We have optimized CPU and memory usage so ...

I just got a new computer so I ran a new and longer benchmark with 200 images on it and both my older machines. Thanks to the updates in Lightroom there are some interesting results: With the ...

Since you're not using Lightroom there aren't as many sustained loads so the 8th gen i7 U processors would also work.  One with an NVIDIA MX150 or the built in AMD Vega graphics would be ideal.  ...

I did need to update the firmware but that didn't do anything. But it just got weirder, I did a littler more trouble shooting and if I delete the 50-150's saved AF Fine Tune value it recognizes ...

Better high ISO performance and a deeper buffer, those are the 2 things that I need. More AF coverage would be nice as well.

Is there any fix?  What's getting me is that it reads correctly in the D750 VS the D7200.

So this is a weird one, I have an AF fine tune setting for my Sigma 50-150 F2.8 which has worked fine BUT the D7200 also applies it to my Tokina 11-20 F2.8 and when I go to the AF Fine Tune menu ...

Or illuminate the focus point currently in use.  I could see that working though it might be too much of a distraction.  Ideally there would be the arrows/dot above or below the AF area which ...