armanius

Only Leica can pull off giving customers less while charging more. You can't fault Leica when there are enough people who will buy the D to make it profitable for Leica. Kudos to Leica for tapping...

I find my XT2's AFC fairly competent tracking a running child if I use the PD area only. I'm surprised that the XT3 would fail doing on this subject. With 99% PD coverage, faster processor,...

I'd hope an EM5 iii is cheaper than $1500!

I'm impressed for a cell phone camera!! Very nice!

Tough choice between the A7iii and XT3. I am much more vested in m4/3 and Fuji. But I also have a couple of Sony FE lenses that I kept after selling the original A7.

No one is forcing anyone to watch the videos. DPR still does written reviews. It's just not out yet. Good grief ...

Great review Jordan and Chris! I still have a hard time associating you two with DPR instead of Camera Store. Nevertheless, I'm glad that y'all are still doing great informative videos. Just sad...

I'd gladly pay $100 extra for a XT3 with IBIS.

Most compelling new feature for me is the near full coverage of the sensor by the phase detection pixels. Now I can finally use AFC towards the edges of the frame. I wish Fuji would implement the...

Agreed. Other than IBIS, there isn't anything else about the XH1 that is objectively better than the XT3. And some would even dispute that having IBIS is better than not having it. Bigger grip is...

Pricey lenses. At least Canon's 35/1.8 is cheaper than its counterparts -- Nikon's 35/1.8 and Sony's 35/2.8.

@Mared - I wrote my comment before DPR updated the article to include pricing. Pricing was not in the first version of the article.

I'm very intrigued and impressed by Canon! More so than Nikon's approach to mirrorless. Hope the pricing of the Canon isn't too crazy. If it is not, it may be time to ditch my m4/3, Fuji and Sony...

I don't like Canon. But I am VERY intrigued. And I am impressed with the leaked info about the camera and the four lenses. May finally buy a Canon!

The Nikon is better looking!

$850 for the 35/1.8 and $600 for 50/1.8. I suppose the two Sony/Zeiss at the initial A7 launch were pricey as well. Still, these crazy lens prices make it more difficult to do a system switch. Will...

It actually said Amazon as the seller.

Why is Amazon selling the 35/1.8 for $846 vs the $599 retail price?

Interesting pricing at Amazon. Buying the body with 35/1.8 or 50/1.8 costs more than buying the camera and body separately?

Wish it had a manual zoom like a Fuji X10/20/30. Alas, maybe in the LX100 mark 3.