Leopard1

Those 4 lenses together cost more than my car...

Mine since 2010, never let me down. Very decent pics.

Good shots, but shutter speed too low to acquire perfection.

300 PF taken from a boat.

Forget to mention, the 300 PF is great for macro's also.

Taken in November 2021 in Mexico.

My 300 PF was not noticeable sharper than my older 300 AFS, which was a very good lens. But the pleasure with the PF  were its VR, very compact size and low weight. It works great with the TC14E II ...

After travelling over 35 years and over 80 countries I've tried every possible SLR combination under very diverse circumstances. A city trip is of course different from a wildlife safari. I've also ...

If I see these specs, then the Z 24-120 f4 should be my entry ticket to the Z system. If the shipping can cope with it...

I think it's a Nikkor 24-70 f2.8 VR.

I have both: the 300 AFS and the PF. The IQ difference is very, very narrow. The PF does have the edge when it comes to manageability. The VR is very useful, as well as the extreme low weight and ...

The 300 PF is the ideal telephoto-travel lens.

Wasn't it this one ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_state_car_(United_States)

Obvious ? My physical condition should not be an object of observation here.

My physical condition belongs to my private life, not your concern. No need to insult me in what shape I am.

Finally I've bought the 300 PF as well as the 500 PF. Both great lenses. Use them with a TC 14E II and D850. Way more pleasing than the really heavy 200-500.

My current lightweight setup for travel consists of only 2 lenses: the remarkable 18-35 AFS G and the 70-200 f4 AFS. The 18-35 is a wonderful and lightweight lens. Despite some light distortion, ...