Tommygun45

Joined on Dec 22, 2011

Comments

Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

I guess when you realize that putting sanctions on countries only hurts innocent civilians you need something else to focus your attention on and make yourself seem viable

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2017 at 02:49 UTC as 11th comment

The only real question we're left with is, Will it Blend?

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 02:58 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Boky: Canon should've used that money for R&D. They need to start making competitive cameras again.

But the 6d mark ii is a hybrid camera that shoots 4k, so in that instance obviously its a ... oh wait what the hell am i talking about? No it doesnt!

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2017 at 00:55 UTC

Everyone is missing the point of what this drive is for. If anyone edits video and uses Adobe Premier Pro, and has a MacBook Pro, like lots of people, you are stuck with one drive. Premier Pro performs infinitely better if you can use at least one more drive as a scratch disk to manage the cache. Editing 4k off my Phantom 4 Pro is almost impossible on my brand new $3000 loaded MBP. But with this attached, it would be a breeze. I had the same bottlenecks on my loaded desktop and after installing two SSDs in addition to my primary Samsung m.2 drive the thing absolutely rips apart 4k video now, from my a6500 and Phantom 4 Pro. Anyone wondering how this works should watch this video because it has made my life dramatically better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7zI7MYSY_0&t=198s

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 01:05 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

User3787089555: In my opinion, FE12-24 is way too small to be a top quality lens, compared with Canon 11-24L and Sigma 12-24.

Fascinating. Is this the whole entitlement thing? "I have an opinion and think it deserves to be heard, even if my opinion is completely idiotic and not based in reality?"

How are Leica lenses, up to your standards? Or are they not big enough? You are a moron.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 01:36 UTC
In reply to:

Shlomo Goldwasser: Nice and informative review.

All that glue makes the lens look pretty low grade, from a manufacturing quality point of view. Is glue completely essential, or is it the engineer's workaround to avoid adding more screws?

I would prefer more screws and no glue, especially at this price point.

An F-22 is mostly glued together. It costs a few hundred million dollars.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2017 at 15:47 UTC

I just don't get people. I was taking grad classes a few years ago and a photographer came into our class. He took some pictures and left. Two years later my friends younger sister gave me the grad school promo book the school sent out to all potential applicants. There I was, right on the cover. Me, her, and my friends and family all thought it was the coolest thing ever. So I got a magnet and put it on my fridge.

Apparently I should have lawyered up and sued. What the *$%* is wrong with people?

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 21:57 UTC as 12th comment
On article SLT strikes back: Sony a99 II real-world sample gallery (272 comments in total)

I am not good enough at video to need the hundreds of features the GH5 has, but how would this camera compare to it in terms of video?

I am looking to simplify my real estate business photography and pictures/videos of my kid to one system and this looks like it might work.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 18:48 UTC as 11th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Jack Hogan: Is this supposed to be a 2016 survey or one for 2012? Using four year old list prices as a reference is disingenuous. For instance D750 and a7II bodies cost roughly the same today. Yet a reader of the 2016 roundup would be unaware the former, with its excellent complement of lenses, has been available for sale in this price range for some time.

I got a d750 gray on ebay over a year ago for $1299. Thing has worked like a champ. That was a wonderful deal.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2016 at 01:22 UTC
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 review (1181 comments in total)

How does this thing focus in low light? Have they improved since the A6000? I sold mine and got a D750 and the thing is just instantaneous but I am missing eye focus for shooting my toddler.

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2016 at 03:14 UTC as 146th comment | 3 replies

In LR on my Mac with LR5 and 6, and now on my PC with LRCC I have the same stinking error all the time. When using the adjustments brush, after a certain amount of time it won't register. I will click on the brush, and then begin to make an adjustment, and nothing will happen. I found a workaround online that you toggle the on/off switch in the bottom left of the pane, and then it will come back to life, but that fix was from a 2013 article. How is this such a blatant bug that happens to me EVERY TIME I use the software, across multiple platforms and years, that still has not been fixed? Figure it out Adobe.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 15:22 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2674 comments in total)
In reply to:

Johannes Compaan: I just had the pleasure to grab a RAW from the K1 and play around a little. Without to much of a hassle, the result was astonishing. Have a look:

http://www.johannescompaan.com.br/#!Pentax-K1-Pentaxs-first-Digital-FF/c1tgn/56cb3e100cf24bcda470030d

I'm not sure if astonishing is the word I would use if I had been around any Sony sensor the past 4 years. I feel like the A6000 is capable of a pull like that and I know my D750 is more than capable of doing that. Yes its neat but not exactly earth shattering.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 18:28 UTC

So I saw that boxing picture and was like, HA! That Barry guy is boxing. And then I looked at 100% and I am pretty sure that's not Barry. But a scary, criminal version of Barry.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 23:42 UTC as 19th comment

Bah. Disappointing. Glad I sold my A6000 a few months ago and went the D750 route. Still have the RX100III for portability. They had been so responsive, almost to a fault, that I guess our expectations got high. Now they can't let this thing eat into their A7 series. Annoying though, why the massive price increases?like the A6000 debuted at what, $799 with a lens? This thing is a couple years removed and they are asking for that kind of premium? Doesn't make sense.

One other note, it drives me insane when people talk about the different materials for the bodies. As if the A6000 was some fragile piece of kit that broke on people all the time. With the likely hundreds of thousands of bodies that the A6000 sold I have never seen an issue of a hardware related fault or failure. But let's all demand some stronger body because that's what's necessary and we should be spending money on. Foolish.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:34 UTC as 293rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Nicolas Alexander Otto: Good thing Sigma lenses are getting amazingly good these days. :)

A 15-30, with VC, that outperforms the 14-24 in virtually all regards, for roughly half the price. So I'd say so.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 12:48 UTC

Can someone explain to me how Japan has one of the most modern economies in the world but in order to make simple purchases you have to calculate things in the hundreds of thousands? Like, drop a few zeroes dudes.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 16:19 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Nicolas Alexander Otto: Good thing Sigma lenses are getting amazingly good these days. :)

Don't forget the Tamron FX Trinity.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 16:18 UTC
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Financial Results
Decline
Sales
Operating Income
Constant Currency Basis
Exchange Rates
Predictions
Forecast
Profitability
Billion Yen
Volume
Spin Off
Acquire

Yes...

This is a photography website...

.

These are all fairly basic terms. This is not a photography website it is a website dedicated to photographic companies and their gear. Telling us about the financial performance of a specific Camera company provides insight as to what that company might do next.

Perhaps you'd be better suited reading SonyAlphaRumors which just basically makes stuff up every day throws everything at the wall and hopes for something to stick. This article tells me that Sony will continue focusing more on higher margin products, which means its Full Frame cameras because they generate a higher profit than lower margin cameras, like the A6000.

What makes more profit... Selling a camera that costs you $1600 to make for $3,300. Or selling a camera that costs $400 to make for $700. The difference is called margin. More expensive cameras have higher margins, and therefore are more profitable per unit.

Therefore, I'm not holding my breath for an A7000.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2015 at 16:47 UTC
In reply to:

falconeyes: Small Sony is making a solid profit year after year - despite their bold effort at innovation and R&D.

Makes me wonder where all that money within much bigger Canon and Nikon is going to ... There must be a staff of lazy/inefficient and wealthy people to be sustained ;)

Ever see the speech Michael Douglas gives to Teldar Paper in Wall Street? Its probably alot like that.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2015 at 16:41 UTC
In reply to:

Tommygun45: BBUURRRNNNNNNN HIM!! Just kidding I love it.

Oh and please crop that dudes arm out in the first picture. Its a nice picture but that guys arm is killing it for me!

I really need to learn CS6. LR is nice and all but I feel like I am missing out on a lot of features.

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 13:47 UTC
Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »