Luis Gabriel Photography

Luis Gabriel Photography

Lives in Utah
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Apr 25, 2016

Comments

Total: 134, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JanMatthys: Of all the FF mirrorless cameras announced, this is the most promising one. Panny performance, ergonomics, video, UI with a FF sensor, sign me up!

and Panny video AF???? sign me off if they cannot fix that.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2019 at 19:09 UTC
On article Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2018 (528 comments in total)
In reply to:

demaio: DPR is selling Sony, as always.
Well, this is a gear site and Sony' specs win hands down right now. But as a photographer I have to chose the system as a whole, not distinct pieces from different manufacturers. This is why I'm selling now almost all of my prosumer Nicon gear and buying Canon EOS R. Canon's lenses are the best, other being clearly inferior.

are we still on the absurd "canon colors" thing? time to move on guys...

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2018 at 21:42 UTC
On article Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2018 (528 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leo Pan: Why no best tripod awards?

pwned lol

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2018 at 21:40 UTC
On article Sony 24mm F1.4 GM sample gallery (194 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: Now, if Sony can just make a camera I can buy...

@Rick Knepper, are the Canon forums so boring you are here trolling? Reported.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2018 at 17:43 UTC
On article Sony 24mm F1.4 GM sample gallery (194 comments in total)
In reply to:

RMGoodLight: I dunno if I compare the sample gallery of the new Canon 50mm 1.2 and this Sony 24mm 1.4 the Canon wins hands down. Sony might have improved theyr image colors but it still can't beat Canon in this regard.

I only look at image colors. I know its not a fair comparison 50mm vs. 24mm.

@TrojMacReady, I am at the point that nothing a fanboy can say surprises me any more. They see what they want to see and is pointless trying to argue about it. I just keep taking photos instead :)

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2018 at 17:41 UTC
On article Sony 24mm F1.4 GM sample gallery (194 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Orange & yellow as always

"orange and yellow" of envy?
Gotta love trolls as I saw from pretty much any comment you ever make. Blocked...

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2018 at 17:36 UTC
In reply to:

Imager of: No 1inch sensor and no 1000mm. Not interested.

ok then...

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2018 at 06:34 UTC

This is an intriguing small camera. Looking forward to trying one to see how for example, a noise reduction multishot mode works as workaround for the normal noisy performance in low light environments for static subjects.
Also wondering how good the 4K is going to look.
For travel photos (ie FB and IG posting) it may just be enough while giving a lot of range and small footprint.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:36 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

Fly18: It’s interesting, and funny, that the “regular” Sony fanboys don’t comment on a Sony article while they are all over Nikon’s (and soon Canon) articles!

Fly18..they dont need to post here when we get trolls fanboys of other brands commenting instead...

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:33 UTC
In reply to:

jim seekers: I think canon produce the best superzoom compacts.

Really? Like which ones because when I look at the best small superzooms all I see good are the Panasonics and now the Sony. And on the bigger superzooms, they got the sx50 then failed with the sx60 and right now all the talk is about the Nikon P1000.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:32 UTC
In reply to:

CanonSharpShooter: The Canon EOS R has stolen this poor cams release hype.

Yep pretty much ANY evf is better than no EVF for anyone shooting outdoors.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:29 UTC
In reply to:

tangbunna: F3.5 at wide 24mm is a century old conpared to smartphone down to f1.8~f1.5. that's the reason why people rarely bring p&s camera to their party at night

Choose the right tool for the job...that is how smart people do it ;)

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:27 UTC
In reply to:

Imager of: No 1inch sensor and no 1000mm. Not interested.

1" and 1000mm LOL you are kidding, right?

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:26 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): It's embarrassing that Sony is still 10 years in the past and is not able to make the menu work with a touchscreen... I can't believe how stupid they are.

yep Sony is very stupid..look all the outdated technology they keep putting out like the A73, A9....grow up...

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:21 UTC
In reply to:

The Name is Bond: The small aperture and small sensor does make me wonder whether the loss of quality zoomed (and lack of low-light flexibility) means that the 1" equivalent with a bigger aperture and much smaller zoom might actually beat this when cropped in.

In which case it's all marketing.

Sure there is no way to even crop the RX10 IV to match a 3000mm but on the other hand, low light of the RX10m4 is going to be a LOT better so indeed, each one has its place which is why I have a P900 (and getting P1000) for those "fun" long shots, while also having FF, 1" and m43.
A tool for different needs.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2018 at 13:19 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: Good for Sony! Hopefully their users will be less insecure now.

Says the man trolling a Sony related article...guess who is proving to be insecure here?? ;)

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2018 at 14:01 UTC
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: The writers argue that something like a D850 can do almost as well for less money, yet the photo gallery makes liars of you all.
The portraits shot with flash are world class, they are as good as anything I've seen anywhere—professional or amateur, contemporary or vintage.
Take for instance the Richard Butler picture, in photos he usually comes across as a very handsome, nattily attired gentleman, but human nonetheless. In this gallery he is resplendent, like one of God's own emissaries descended to earth on a divine motor scooter.
Explain that with the dull and fragile tools you call science.

Sure It has to be the camera making the difference......

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2018 at 10:47 UTC
In reply to:

kbryd: From those three the best one is Canon G7X mark II. It is much cheaper than Sony, it has better lens (24-105/1.8-2.8), very good AF, excellent color rendition.

Sorry you are wrong. I actually started with the G7X then the G7X ii because I wanted the longer reach but the lens was so soft specially at 105mm that it made it useless for me. The rx100 iii and the V I have now both have easily better lenses not to mention the AF of the V is way ahead of the Canon

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2018 at 00:20 UTC
In reply to:

kty: I'd rather buy a GX80 and pair it with a nice compact lens like the Pana 12-32 or 1.7/20 or 1.7/15 or Laowa 7,5mm or Zuiko 2/12 or 1.8/17 or ...
Only marginally larger and marginally heavier but more versatile, better lowlight, better DR, better everything!
Hell, that'd still be cheaper than that RX100! Admitted, the Sony is a beast. But it is undeniably overpriced!

For my needs I am considering the Panasonic but in don't see it as a replacement for the pocketability of the rx100 as it is much bigger and requires lens swapping thus not the same market

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2018 at 00:17 UTC
In reply to:

kty: I'd rather buy a GX80 and pair it with a nice compact lens like the Pana 12-32 or 1.7/20 or 1.7/15 or Laowa 7,5mm or Zuiko 2/12 or 1.8/17 or ...
Only marginally larger and marginally heavier but more versatile, better lowlight, better DR, better everything!
Hell, that'd still be cheaper than that RX100! Admitted, the Sony is a beast. But it is undeniably overpriced!

Better yes but "marginally" larger??? It is clearly bigger and not after the same market.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2018 at 00:15 UTC
Total: 134, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »