itaibachar

Lives in Israel Tel Aviv, Israel
Joined on Jan 26, 2005

Comments

Total: 42, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

ef 28 1.8

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 18:25 UTC as 2nd comment

His stripes shirt seems a bit depressing.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2017 at 18:13 UTC as 67th comment
On article Leica SL Review (1079 comments in total)

At least it had a 100 MP sensor for this kind of money.
Another lifestyle toy from Leica.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 18:16 UTC as 151st comment | 1 reply
On article Leica SL Review (1079 comments in total)
In reply to:

scastle: I'm curious to see how the professional world views this camera. If enough people don't go for it then Leica will not recover their development costs. If the ergonomics are really that awful I don't see much hope, unless some advantage is offered that wasn't mentioned in the review.

Its a lifestyle camera for the rich and famous, and other oligarchs...

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 18:15 UTC
On article Google AI adds detail to low-resolution images (150 comments in total)

It invents images? thats weird.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2017 at 18:09 UTC as 14th comment
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (634 comments in total)

Ain't no beauty queen.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:48 UTC as 101st comment

Who makes Leica's sensors?

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2017 at 21:01 UTC as 51st comment | 7 replies
On article Close-up: Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: The body of this thing with small sensor seems LARGER than SONY Full frame camera.

Anyway, small sensor big body.

do you care about image quality? i do... comparing a 4/3 to an A7?...

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 09:07 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2127 comments in total)

Looking forward for the 5dsII... 50mp of improved sensor sounds yummy.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2016 at 18:27 UTC as 53rd comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10/LX15 Review (402 comments in total)

The more competition to the Sony RX100, the better for us humans.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2016 at 18:23 UTC as 62nd comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10/LX15 Review (402 comments in total)
In reply to:

Misch1969: Hi, for me the missing of ND filter is a no go, how t use 1.4 in bright sunlight.

so keep the lx7?

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2016 at 18:22 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10/LX15 Review (402 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: It seems like real world that the G7X lens is much more ideal if you are going to shoot pictures of people. It is a lot faster at 30-45mm equivalent for street style shots and then has a lens that actually extends out to the portrait ranges with the ability to give a little bg blur.

The LX10 has much faster 24mm equivalent only, and that seems more likely to be scenery type shots that could just use OIS to compensate anyway.

RX100 loses to both for aperture and range, but probably has the sharpest lens...

its crap at the 70mm edge.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2016 at 18:18 UTC

Is it possible to take RAW photos with an Android phone, like the Samsung s4?

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2016 at 07:32 UTC as 6th comment

Too contrasty.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 19:04 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

Iamnotarobot: I guess there is nothing really special about his cameras because most of his creativity came out of his extensive/obsessive darkroom work. It could be said that he was the father of photoshop with his obsessive level of selective dodge & burn & image post alteration/manipulation...

the word obsessive doesn't seem right...

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 18:37 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V (235 comments in total)
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: I would consider this camera if it had a less compromised 24-90/110/120/135 2.8 constant or 2.8-3.5 lens. I've always disliked 24-70 lenses due to lack of range. I don't care about the whole 1.8 at the wide end thing.

I have the rx100-4, i have never used the viewfinder. its so small and fiddly, its close to useless.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 07:33 UTC
In reply to:

itaibachar: This body design is useless with action/sports. The Nikon D500/Canon 7D is so much better. Sure the low weight is nice, but handling is p&s level.

its a toy. a box for sony to test technologies. it sucks as a camera body.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2016 at 14:08 UTC
In reply to:

nathanleebush: Love my Mark IV, but the 3 stop ND filter makes no sense for video when their S Log 2 mode starts at 1600 ISO! a 6/9 stop makes more sense so you can achieve shallow depth of field outside. I find that the 3 stop means I'm still shooting video at F13 and having highlights blown! Come on Sony, think! NDs are for filmmakers, filmmakers shoot LOG, LOG starts at 1600 ISO, so 3 stops is too weak!

I tried it, graded it (duhh), and it is useless.
just my opinion.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2016 at 14:06 UTC

This body design is useless with action/sports. The Nikon D500/Canon 7D is so much better. Sure the low weight is nice, but handling is p&s level.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 19:35 UTC as 132nd comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

JSmitty: Why, in God's name, do they not put any sort of grip on this thing?!

Agree, its a pain to hold/handle as is.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 19:25 UTC
Total: 42, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »