jwalker019

Lives in United States Dallas, United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2004

Comments

Total: 50, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

The fact that 204,800 is actually somewhat usable is unbelieveable. I've never needed above 25,600 (!) and that looks pretty darned good if you're OK with heavy noise reduction :) 6,400 is great, and that's all I need for 95% of my shooting.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 21:26 UTC as 41st comment
On article Sony brings uncompressed Raw to a7S II, a7R II and... (562 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: nt

https://alphauniverse.com/stories/sony-announces-addition-of-uncompressed-14-bit-raw-still-image-capture-for-new---cameras/

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2015 at 16:18 UTC

Nice! Works well, and gives me much better control over exposure, etc., than the built in app :)

Apple should implement this as a toggle (e.g., automatic / manual) for future releases.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2014 at 21:02 UTC as 20th comment
On article Adobe announces new 'Focus masks' feature in CC update (16 comments in total)

When will this update be available? Creative Cloud shows no updates currently available :/

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 16:33 UTC as 5th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

beavertown: How come every manufacturer can make better products than Nikon?

Nikon's VR II only has 2 stops in reality.

The Tamron's VC kills Nikon's VR II by miles.

Now Fuji's OIS is going to insult Nikon's VR II.

Get a grip Nikon!

Four stops. Quite a difference from "2 stops".

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 14:45 UTC

Cool idea :) but really poor implementation - looks like what I used to do with Photoshop before I learned to use Photoshop :/

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 20:01 UTC as 9th comment
On article Fujifilm X-T1 real-world samples gallery (185 comments in total)

Besides the design and features of the camera, I have to comment on the handling of noise at high ISO. Now seeing shots at ISO 6400 that look like 400 just a few years ago. Amazing what APS-C cameras can do these days!

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2014 at 19:21 UTC as 61st comment
On article Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' (372 comments in total)

I'm short of cash right now :( but this goes on my wish list if it performance is even equal to X-E2 (and it sounds like it will be better) :)

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 20:46 UTC as 94th comment
On article Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera (906 comments in total)

I was thinking this would be large, but looking at other rumor sites on the web (that have apparently real leaked photos), it's actually *smaller* than the X-E2! Ergonomics look great - *very* tempting for me :/

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2014 at 16:17 UTC as 153rd comment | 1 reply

I think it's great they're finally releasing an upgraded grip, but why would they not just have designed the camera properly in the first place?

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 05:17 UTC as 23rd comment | 4 replies
On article Sample Gallery: Nokia Lumia 1520 smartphone images (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

belard: My 2014 resolution:

Ditch the word 'phablet'.

Partially yours,
The World

"Commonly used"? By whom? Have never heard this term before except in "print" / on the web.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2013 at 23:04 UTC

Sounds like I'm in the minority, but Xtrans is the reason I bought my X-E1. An X-series camera without XTrans? Why?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2013 at 11:28 UTC as 31st comment | 5 replies
On article Check out the first images from the iPhone 5S (71 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: Also note that the high-speed video modes may be suffering from pixel binning. That is, the 720p120 mode may, in reality, only capture at half the resolution in both directions; that is, 640*360.

At least that's the case with the iPhone 5 running on iOS7 (see http://www.iphonelife.com/blog/87/will-ios7-indeed-support-60fps-video-recording-yes-it-will for some precise resolution measurements.)

All in all, the photo-related improvements are indeed minimal, even if you take the, compared to the iPhone 5, double-Megapixel panorama mode, the somewhat (not much - the difference is WAY smaller than, say, between 1/3" and 1/2.3" or 1/2.3" and 1/1.7") larger sensor and brighter lens into account:

- still no double capturing (which would HIGHLY be useful when you'd like to include the image of the person taking the shot in the final video / pic too), unlike in LG G2

- no OIS (see LG G2 and Lumia 1020 - or, if you're looking for something cheaper, the Lumia 92x or the HTC One)

(contd below)

You keep mentioning "OIS" - on this and the other thread. iPhone has had image stabilization for years - what specifically are you looking for?

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 21:03 UTC
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1852 comments in total)

Yep, confirmation they're abandoning photographers and only providing old and or dumbed-down versions of the software I (used to) use. Hopefully another company will be able to pick up the slack.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 00:40 UTC as 806th comment

Guess that's the end of Photoshop for me - no way in h*ll I'm paying a monthly fee to use it :/

Link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 18:36 UTC as 750th comment
Total: 50, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »