Lives in Denmark Lyngby, Denmark
Works as a Software Developer
Joined on Sep 7, 2010


Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On article CP+ 2017: Ricoh teases upcoming D FA* 50mm F1.4 (95 comments in total)

Look at the size of that thing!!

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 08:35 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies

Hey, look at all those scene modes. "Cute dessert", "Sweet child's face". "Warm glowing nightscape". I need one of those! :-)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:29 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)

This AF-C discussion ought to be winding down by now. So perhaps I shouldn't be posting this then...
Anyway - two things:
1. I trust the DPR AF-C test. Its results on the Pentax cameras mirror my own experiences very well. My own K-3 also usually adjusts the focus only every second or third exposure in an AF-C burst. And I've shot a good amount of competitive bike racing with it.
2. The Pentax system is actually capable of shooting AF-C sequences where it adjusts the focus for every shot, even at closer range. I've seen this a number of times. But it's rare.


Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 21:06 UTC as 190th comment | 7 replies
On article Hands-on with the Pentax K-3 II (526 comments in total)
In reply to:

yesman12: When I see innovation like this, it confirms the reason I went with In Body Image Stabilization... Much more innovative and extensible than In Lens. And all the noise around In Lens being better is probably a wash at this point. In lens is a hold over from film era. Look what In Body can give you....

- Image stabilization on all lenses.
- Tilt shift function on all lenses up to a few degrees.
- Astrotracer in body equatorial mount (and I have used it)
- Macro adjustment
- Configurable aniti- Alias filtering
- And now increased resolution (I am sure off tripod will follow).

Where as In Lens only provides IS on a given lens. That is it.

Don't forget automatic horizon correction. I leave it on permanently and it's great.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2015 at 12:19 UTC
On article Blast from the past: Photographing steam locomotives (72 comments in total)

This is the (... what? you can't swear here? ...) . #2 is fantastic.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2014 at 11:03 UTC as 40th comment

"The viewfinder now operates at 200Hz, meaning a lag of just 0.005 seconds." This is not necessarily correct. The lag can be anything and is not directly related to the frequency, as the quote implies.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2014 at 08:31 UTC as 20th comment | 5 replies
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Norwegian wood: So it got GPS in the external viewfinder. Which silly engineer decided that? So When I shoot flash, or don't carry the external viewfinder I don't get GPS? Well...not a real problem for me since I don't aim to buy it, ever, but anyway...plain silly or did I miss something?

Perhaps it's an antenna thing, if the GPS signal can't penetrate the aluminum body shell?

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 10:22 UTC

Holy barrel distortion, Batman!

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2014 at 09:25 UTC as 60th comment
On article Canon EOS 6D sample images added to hands-on preview (252 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scott Eaton: Nice to know that Canon is still using the same engine that blows reds and produces mushy colors that rival 1998 consumer print film.

Blown reds are entirely fixable in-camera. Just pick a "natural" picture style and/or dial down saturation a notch or two.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 13:21 UTC
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9