Canyongazer

Lives in United States Central, United States
Works as a retired Professor of Photography
Joined on Mar 10, 2009

Comments

Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need (1100 comments in total)

The D850 is plenty good enough for DPR members shots of:

their cruise ships
their cats,
sunsets they've seen
back yard flora and fauna
cameras they used to own,
more cats
street photographs of people's backs
their dog
their wife in the house
their wife in front of a monument
their wife at lunch
their buddy at lunch
their lunch

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2017 at 00:35 UTC as 111th comment | 4 replies
On article The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need (1100 comments in total)
In reply to:

Island Golfer: But, I already have the only camera I'll ever need. Isn't that what I was told when I bought the D810?

Actually, I told myself the D800E was the last dSLR I'd ever need.
Believed it then.
Believe it now.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2017 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

snapa: They only made 10 because that is probably (hopefully) the most people foolish or rich enough to think about buying that kind of camera. It comes with a fixed 28mm *F5.6 lens*, how crazy is that! I wonder how the 4K video and IBIS works on it, just kidding 😉
What a worthless POS overpriced camera, OMG! Made for people with more $ than sense.

Shigzeo, I agree with all you've written except, unfortunately, this:

"resentment, pure and simple, and is below these forums."

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2017 at 13:42 UTC
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: I got a used Panasonic GF1 with 20mm f1.7 for $90.

Agreed, Boss.
I still have GX1, that 20mm and the 14-42.
They live in my car except during July/August heat

Link | Posted on May 16, 2017 at 12:41 UTC
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: I got a used Panasonic GF1 with 20mm f1.7 for $90.

Noir, I just gave my GF1 away after KEH offered me $20 for it.

Link | Posted on May 15, 2017 at 13:20 UTC
On article In praise of shooting monochrome landscapes (335 comments in total)
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: Best ever memorable landscape photographs are all monochrome. Also all other best ever memorable photographs, all monochrome. Considering that, colour photography is just a childish obsession.

for a poetic perspective...
Roses are grey
Violets are grey
I'm a dog
You're not

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2017 at 21:24 UTC
In reply to:

entoman: Fantastic shots, but I feel that several of them have been "done before" and are becoming a little bit of a cliche. The image that really stood out for me was "Out of the Blue" by Nick Blake. A great composition and stunning lighting.

ent, I get your point but do remember,
Just because you haven't seen it before doesn't mean it hadn't been done.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 13:49 UTC
In reply to:

jennajenna: where can we see what cameras were used?

Nor do trees, rocks, waves, brides and your Aunt Sally.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 13:37 UTC
In reply to:

Spectro: nice, basically what you really need is a powerful strobe that can do high sync and maybe a big space.

When the flash is the main light, shutter speed is irrelevant vis a vis exposure (unless deliberately dragging the shutter for blur)
Exposure time = flash duration.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 03:25 UTC
On article Instax goes luxury with Michael Kors collaboration (38 comments in total)

To All You Nay Sayers:

Apparently you have failed to notice:

This is a "limited edition"

It is a " Kors-branded camera"

It is finished in "metallic gold."

It has Michael Kors' signature on the back

It has the brand logo on the front.

Good God, what more do you want in a camera?!

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2016 at 00:48 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

bluevellet: They have a 12-24 F4 lens too? Wow.

I would have been interested in their 85 f1.4 some years ago, but I bought the Nikkor 85 f1.8 long ago. It's fine for me. You took too long to deliver your new 85mm, Sigma

Damn you, Sigma!
You have botched a possible sale to "bluevellet" thanks to your own lethargy!

Heads will roll!

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 00:27 UTC
In reply to:

chkproductions: I was taught the Zone System by an assistant to Adams, Stephan Gersh (who told me my rocks in a B&W print looked like rubber and quickly shredded my print in the paper cutter)
http://stephangershphotography.com/artist.html

From my experience, visualization (or pre-visualization) was not so much the composition (nothing would save an ill compose image) but rather what it would take through choice of film, its exposure based on the scene's reflectance values and what it was you wanted to retain as detailed in the highlights and lowlights, development in what developer for what time (N=normal, thus n-1 for less contrast, n+2 for more contrast, etc); through to paper choice and paper developer.

It was a disciplined process, testing various films with a densitometer to find their limits.

Adams was amazing in developing this system so that when he set up his camera he knew beforehand (visualization) what he needed to do to portray the feeling that scene gave him at that time.

"I was taught the Zone System by an assistant to Adams, Stephan Gersh "

Hey, I too, had him when I was getting my M.A. in Photography at Goddard.

I've never encountered anyone before or since who could conduct a critique session as insightful and articulate as Stephan Gersh.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2016 at 12:32 UTC
In reply to:

mailman88: I know one thing....getting that close to a rocket launch, took bigtime connections. Most likely illegal access, for a photo-op.
But the pics look great

Please Mr. Postman, look and see
"I know one thing..."
and yet, as it happens, the one thing you know is wrong.
Pity.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2016 at 00:33 UTC
In reply to:

RedFox88: meh. and how is lava "wildlife" ? It isn't.

Sullen teenagers roll their eyes and mutter "whatever"
Several years later, still sullen, they say
"meh"
Not sure about the eye rolling.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2016 at 12:48 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: Wake me up when some company delivers a set of lenses all at f/4: 24/4, 35/4, 50/4, 75/4, 105/4, all bijou and petite, optically brilliant, distortion free, excellent 3D rendering, and razor sharp. That will be the day when digital photography may celebrate real accomplishment and we clap that someone started using brains and delivered fully on digital promise.

I finally get a handle on "bokeh" and now need to seek lenses with good "bijou?"

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 21:46 UTC
In reply to:

Yake: If I had money to burn, this is how I would burn it. :-)

Here's a plan:
In the unlikely event you get "enough money to burn", don't buy one.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 21:59 UTC

This is probably the cheapest, simplest, most easily understood and mastered equipment that the astronauts use.
Yet here we are grinding away on a website devoted to the selection, purchase and use of same.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2016 at 02:17 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

Correction man: "Swedish medium-format camera manufacturer Hasselblad "

shouldn't this read "Japanese" Manufacturer (Fuji)" as that is where these lenses are Manufactured and by whom ????
as are the camera Bodies also

The shutter is a more important lens component than the glass?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 03:26 UTC
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (717 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jerry Canon: It is totally beyond my scope of understanding why anyone in their right mind would shell out $7,500 for this very limited camera, other than it's a Leica. Sure it's a Leica but why would you want this thing with its big ugly screw right in the center of its face?

Priorities.
You could buy three Monochrome bodies for the price of that 200HP outboard motor on your neighbor's bass boat.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2015 at 21:15 UTC
On article Beyond the table top: 5 mini tripods reviewed (202 comments in total)
In reply to:

steve from indy: no picks for the average guy who hasn't got $100 for a mini tripod?

The nice thing about well made tripods is the "investment" is spread over many, many years. Unless you lose it, you won't have to replace it....
Tripod technology is pretty mature....unlike cameras, it's unlikely we'll be anxiously awaiting the release of "Tripod Mark III" next month to replace our soon to be embarrassingly outdated Mark II model.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 20:14 UTC
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »